The Effect of Sampling-Time Variation on Latent Growth Curve Models

REFERENCES

• Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 815–824. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2003). Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: Implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychological Methods, 8, 338–363. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blozis, S. A. (2004). Structured latent curve models for the study of change in multivariate repeated measures. Psychological Methods, 9, 334–353. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.9.3.334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blozis, S. A. (2007). On fitting nonlinear latent curve models to multiple variables measured longitudinally. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 179–201. doi:10.1080/10705510709336743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cudeck, R., & Klebe, K. J. (2002). Multiphase mixed-effects models for repeated measures data. Psychological Methods, 7, 41–63. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer, E., Balluerka, N., & Widaman, K. F. (2008). Factorial invariance and the specification of second-order latent growth models. Methodology, 4, 22–36. doi:10.1027/1614-2241.4.1.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer, E., Salthouse, T. A., McArdle, J. J., Stewart, W. F., & Schwartz, B. S. (2005). Multivariate modeling of age and retest in longitudinal studies of cognitive abilities. Psychology and Aging, 20, 412–422. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.20.3.412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer, E., Salthouse, T. A., Stewart, W. F., & Schwartz, B. S. (2004). Modeling age and retest processes in longitudinal studies of cognitive abilities. Psychology and Aging, 19, 243–259. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.19.2.243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer, E., Steele, J. S., & Hsieh, F. (2012). Analyzing the dynamics of affective dyadic interactions using patterns of intra- and interindividual variability. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 136–171. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.640605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnes, B., & Samuelsson, S. (2011). Phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming predicting early development in reading and spelling: Results from a cross-linguistic longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 85–95. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, W., & Boomsma, A. (2009). Small-sample robust estimators of noncentrality-based and incremental model fit. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 1–27. doi:10.1080/10705510802561279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. (1988). The impact of specification error on the estimation, testing, and improvement of structural equation models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 69–86. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2301_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Ku, L. (2014). Development of materialism in adolescence: The longitudinal role of life satisfaction among Chinese youths. Social Indicators Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0787-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcoulides, K. M., & Yuan, K. (2017). New ways to evaluate goodness of fit: A note on using equivalence testing to assess structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 24, 148–153. doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1225260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArdle, J. J. (1988). Dynamic but structural equation modeling of repeated measures data. In J. R. Nesselroade & R. B. Cattell (Eds.), The handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 561–614). New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• McArdle, J. J. (2009). Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 577–605. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArdle, J. J., Ferrer-Caja, E., Hamagami, F., & Woodcock, R. W. (2002). Comparative longitudinal structure analyses of the growth and decline of multiple intellectual abilities over the life span. Developmental Psychology, 38, 115–142. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.1.115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArdle, J. J., & Hamagami, F. (1992). Modeling incomplete longitudinal and cross-sectional data using latent growth structural models. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 145–166. doi:10.1080/03610739208253917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, W., & Tisak, J. (1990). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika, 55, 107–122. doi:10.1007/BF02294746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murry, V. M., Berkel, C., Simons, R. L., Simons, L. G., & Gibbons, F. X. (2014). A twelve-year longitudinal analysis of positive youth development amongh rural African American males. Research on Adolescence, 24, 512–525. doi:10.1111/jora.12129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (version 3.0.2) [computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Raykov, T. (2000). On sensitivity of structural equation modeling to latent relation misspecifications. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 596–607. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0704_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, L., Reznick, J. S., & Xuehua, L. (2012). Infant word segmentation and childhood vocabulary development: A longitudinal analysis. Developmental Science, 15, 482–495. doi:10.1111/desc.2012.15.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venables, W. (1975). Calculation of confidence intervals for noncentrality parameters. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 37, 406–412.
   Google Scholar
• Vukovic, R. K., & Lesaux, N. K. (2013). The language of mathematics: Investigating the ways language counts for children’s mathematical development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 227–244. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2013.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Farrell, S. (2004). AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 192–196. doi:10.3758/BF03206482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Education and Psychological Measurement, 76, 913–934. doi:10.1177/0013164413495237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K., Chan, W., Marcoulides, G. A., & Bentler, P. M. (2016). Assessing structural equation models by equivalence testing with adjusted fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 319–330. doi:10.1080/10705511.2015.1065414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar