Selecting Path Models in SEM: A Comparison of Model Selection Criteria

REFERENCES

• Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-19, 716–723. doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13, 139–161. doi:10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0
   Google Scholar
• Boekee, D. E., & Buss, H. H. (1981). Order estimation of autoregressive models. In Proceedings of the 4th Aachen colloquium: Theory and application of signal processing (pp. 126–130).
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., Harden, J. J., Ray, S., & Zavisca, J. (2014). BIC and alternative Bayesian information criteria in the selection of structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 21, 1–19. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.856691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., Ray, S., Zavisca, J., & Harden, J. J. (2012). A comparison of Bayes factor approximation methods including two new methods. Sociological Methods & Research, 41, 294–324. doi:10.1177/0049124112452393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozdogan, H. (1987). Model selection and Akaike’s information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52, 345–370. doi:10.1007/BF02294361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 230–258. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33, 261–304. doi:10.1177/0049124104268644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti, A., & Ghosh, J. K. (2011). AIC, BIC, and recent advances in model selection. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, 7, 583–605. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-51862-0.50018-6
   Google Scholar
• Cudeck, R., & Brown, M. W. (1983). Cross-validation of covariance structures. Multivariate Behavior Research, 18, 147–167. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr1802_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cudeck, R., & Henly, S. J. (1991). Model selection in covariance structures analysis and the problem of sample size: A clarification. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 512–519. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.3.512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley, R. M., & Haughton, D. (1997). Information criteria for multiple data sets and restricted parameters. Statistica Sinica, 7, 265–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziak, J. J., Coffman, D. L., Lanza, S. T., & Li, R. (2012). Sensitivity and specificity of information criteria (Tech. Rep. No. 12–119). University Park, PA: The Methodology Center, The Pennsylvania State University.
   Google Scholar
• Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 3, 272–299. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J., Nie, Z., & Byrnes, J. (2013). Sem: Structural equation models. R package version 3.1-1. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/packages/sem
   Google Scholar
• Guo, B., Perron, B. E., & Gillespie, D. F. (2009). A systematic review of structural equation modeling in social work research. Bristish Journal of Social Work, 39, 1556–1574. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcn101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, D. M. A. (1988). On the choice of model to fit data from an exponential family. The Annals of Statistics, 16, 342–355. doi:10.1214/aos/1176350709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, D. M. A., Oud, J. H. L., & Jansen, R. A. R. G. (1997). Information and other criteria in structural equation model selection. Communication in Statistics, Part B: Simulation & Computation, 26, 1477–1516. doi:10.1080/03610919708813451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hershberger, S. L. (2003). The growth of structural equation modeling: 1994–2001. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 35–46. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM1001_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homburg, C. (1991). Cross-validation and information criteria in causal modeling. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 137–144. doi:10.2307/3172803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., Jr., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14, 6–23. doi:10.1037/a0014694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294–316). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kashyap, R. L. (1982). Optimal choice of ar and ma parts in autoregressive moving average models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 4, 99–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kass, R. E. (1993). Bayes factors in practice. The Statistician, 42, 551–560. doi:10.2307/2348679
   Google Scholar
• Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773–795. doi:10.2307/2291091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A. (2008). Reflections on mediation. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 353–358. doi:10.1177/1094428107308978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Kuha, J. (2004). AIC and BIC: Comparisons of assumptions and performance. Sociological Methods & Research, 33, 188–229. doi:10.1177/0049124103262065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C. (1995). Model specification: Procedures, strategies, and related issues. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 16–36). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Working with imperfect models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 113–139. doi:10.1207/S15327906MBR3801_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201–224. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (2010). Structural models and the art of approximation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 675–686. doi:10.1177/1745691610388766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishii, B. R. (1984). Asymptotic properties of criteria for selection of variables in multiple regression. The Annals of Statistics, 12, 758–765. doi:10.1214/aos/1176346522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Boyle, E. H., Jr., & Williams, L. J. (2011). Decomposing model fit: Measurement vs. theory in organizational research using latent variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1–12. doi:10.1037/a0020539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paxton, P., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Chen, F. (2001). Monte Carlo experiments: Design and implementation. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 287–312. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0802_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163. doi:10.2307/271063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rissanen, J. (1978). Modeling by shortest data description. Automatica, 14, 465–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sclove, S. L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333–343. doi:10.1007/BF02294360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, R., & Goldstein, S. M. (2006). Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: Looking back and forward. Journal of Operations Management, 24, 148–169. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2005.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao, J. (1997). An asymptotic theory for model selection. Statistics Sincia, 7, 221–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibata, R. (1976). Selection of the order of an autoregressive model by Akaike’s information criterion. Biometrika, 63, 117–126. doi:10.1093/biomet/63.1.117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibata, R. (1983). Asymptotic mean efficiency of a selection of regression variables. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 35, 415–423. doi:10.1007/BF02480998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. M. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
   Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H., Shapiro, A., & Browne, M. W. (1985). On the multivariate asymptotic distribution of sequential chi-square statistics. Psychometrika, 50, 253–264. doi:10.1007/BF02294104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrieze, S. I. (2012). Model selection and psychological theory: A discussion of the differences between Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Psychological Methods, 17, 228–243. doi:10.1037/a0027127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weakliem, D. L. (1999). A critique of the Bayesian information criterion for model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 27, 359–397. doi:10.1177/0049124199027003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C. C. (2006). Evaluating latent class analysis models in qualitative phenotype identification. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 50, 1090–1104. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2004.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C. C., & Yang, C. C. (2007). Separating latent classes by information criteria. Journal of Classification, 24, 183–203. doi:10.1007/s00357-007-0010-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar