1,833
Views
43
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Investigating the Multidimensionality of Need Fulfillment: A Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Representation

, , , &

REFERENCES

  • Arens, A. K., & Morin, A. J. S. (2017). Improved representation of the Self-Perception Profile for Children through bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling. American Educational Research Journal, 54, 59–87.
  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438. doi:10.1080/10705510903008204
  • Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., & Morin, A. J. S. (2015). Bayesian structural equation modeling with cross-loadings and residual covariances: Comments on Stromeyer et al. Journal of Management, 41, 1561–1577. doi:10.1177/0149206315591075
  • Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., Bosch, J. A., & Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011). Self-determination theory and diminished functioning: The role of interpersonal control and psychological need thwarting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1459–1473. doi:10.1177/0146167211413125
  • Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25, 3186–3191. doi:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
  • Bidee, J., Vantilborgh, T., Pepermans, R., Griep, Y., & Hofmans, J. (2016). Temporal dynamics of need satisfaction and need frustration: Two sides of the same coin? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25, 900–913. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2016.1176021
  • Brandtstädter, J., & Greve, W. (1994). The aging self: Stabilizing and protective processes. Developmental Review, 14, 52–80. doi:10.1006/drev.1994.1003
  • Browne, M. (2001). An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 111–150.doi:10.1207/S15327906MBR3601_05
  • Brunet, J., Gunnel, K. E., Teixeira, P., Sabiston, C. M., & Bélanger, M. (2016). Should we be looking at the forest or the trees? Overall psychological need satisfaction and individual needs as predictors of physical activity. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 38, 317–330. doi:10.1123/jsep.2016-0256
  • Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. O. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456
  • Caci, H., Morin, A. J. S., & Tran, A. (2015). Investigation of a bifactor model of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 24, 1291–1301. doi:10.1007/s00787-015-0679-3
  • Campbell, R., Tobback, E., Delesie, L., Vogelaers, D., Mariman, A., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2017). Basic psychological need experiences, fatigue, and sleep in individuals with unexplained chronic fatigue. Stress & Health. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/smi.2751
  • Campbell, R., Vansteenkiste, M., Delesie, L., Soenens, B., Tobback, E., Vogelaers, D., & Mariman, A. (2016). The role of basic psychological need satisfaction, sleep, and mindfulness in the health-related quality of life of people living with HIV. Journal of Health Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1359105316678305
  • Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141913
  • Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E. L., Van Der Kaap-Deeder, J., … Ryan, R. M. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 216–236. doi:10.1007/s11031-014-9450-1
  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834
  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
  • Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., Locke, K. D., Zhang, H., Shen, J., De Jesús Vargas-Flores, J., … Mastor, K. A. (2013). Need satisfaction and well-being: Testing self-determination theory in eight cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 507–534. doi:10.1177/0022022112466590
  • Cordeiro, P., Paixão, P., Lens, W., Lacante, M., & Luyckx, K. (2016). The Portuguese validation of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale: Concurrent and longitudinal relations to well-being and ill-being. Psychologica Belgica, 56, 193–209. doi:10.5334/pb.252
  • Cordeiro, P., Paixão, P., Lens, W., Lacante, M., & Sheldon, K. M. (2016). Factor sturcture and dimensionality of the balanced measure of psychological needs among Portuguese high school students: Relations to well-being and ill-being. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 51–60. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.010
  • Costa, S., Ntoumanis, N., & Bartholomew, K. J. (2015). Predicting the brighter and darker sides of interpersonal relationships. Motivation & Emotion, 39, 11–24. doi:10.1007/s11031-014-9427-0
  • Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. M., Ovadia, S., & Vanneman, R. (2001). The glass ceiling effect. Social Forces, 80, 655–681. doi:10.1353/sof.2001.0091
  • Cross, S., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.122.1.5
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and” why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  • Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Gagné, M., Leone, D. R., Usunov, J., & Kornazheva, B. P. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former eastern bloc country. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 930–942. doi:10.1177/0146167201278002
  • De Winter, J. C. F., Dodou, D., & Wieringa, P. A. (2009). Exploratory factor analysis with mall sample sizes. Multivariate Behavioral Resrearch, 44, 147–181. doi:10.1080/00273170902794206
  • Dunn, T., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 399–412. doi:10.1111/bjop.12046
  • Eid, M. (2000). A multitrait–multimethod model with minimal assumptions. Psychometrika, 65, 241–261. doi:10.1007/BF02294377
  • Eid, M., Nussbeck, F. W., Geiser, C., Cole, D. A., Gollwitzer, M., & Lischetzke, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling of multitrait–multimethod data: Different models for different types of methods. Psychological Methods, 13, 230–253. doi:10.1037/a0013219
  • ESEMeD/MHEDEA 2000 Investigators. (2004). Prevalence of mental disorders in Europe: Results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 109(Suppl. 420), 21–27. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0047.2004.00327.x
  • Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2009). Using goodness-of-fit indexes in assessing mean structure invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 54–69. doi:10.1080/10705510802561311
  • Frielink, N., Schuengel, C., & Embregts, P. J. C. M. (2017). Psychometric properties of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale–Intellectual Disability (BPNSFS–ID). European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000366
  • Gignac, G. E. (2016). The higher-order model imposes a proportionality constraint: That is why the bifactor model tends to fit better. Intelligence, 55, 57–68. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2016.01.006
  • Guay, F., Morin, A. J. S., Litalien, D., Valois, P., & Vallerand, R. J. (2015). Application of exploratory structural equation modeling to evaluate the academic motivation scale. Journal of Experimental Education, 83, 51–82. doi:10.1080/00220973.2013.876231
  • Gunnel, K. E., & Gaudreau, P. (2015). Testing a bi-factor model to disentangle general and specific motivation in self-determination theory. Personality & Individual Differences, 81, 35–40. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.059
  • Haerens, L., Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., & Van Petegem, S. (2015). Do perceived autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching relate to physical education students’ motivational experiences through unique pathways? Distinguishing between the bright and dark side of motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16, 26–36. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.08.013
  • Hambleton, R., & Kanjee, A. (1995). Increasing the validity of cross-cultural assessments: Improved methods for test adaptations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11, 147–157. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.11.3.147
  • Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412–428. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.412
  • Howard, J. L., Gagné, M., Morin, A. J. S., & Forest, J. (2017). Using bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling to test for a continuum structure of motivation. Journal of Management. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0149206316645653
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Hyde, J. S. (2014). Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 373–398. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057
  • Janacsek, K., Fiser, J., & Nemeth, D. (2012). The best time to acquire new skills: Age-related differences in implicit sequence learning across the human lifespan. Developmental Science, 15, 496–505. doi:10.1111/desc.2012.15.issue-4
  • Kessler, R. C., Angermeyer, M., Anthony, J., De Graaf, R., Demyttenaere, K., Gasquet, I., … Üstün, T. B. (2007). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of mental disorders in the World Health Organization’s World Mental Health Survey Initiative. World Psychiatry, 6, 168–176.
  • Krijgsman, C., Vansteenkiste, M., Van Tartwijk, J., Maes, J., Borghouts, L., Cardon, G., … Haerens, L. (2017). Performance grading and motivational functioning and fear in physical education: A self-determination theory perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 202–211. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.017
  • Litalien, D., Guay, F., & Morin, A. J. S. (2015). Motivation for PhD studies: Scale development and validation. Learning and Individual Differences, 41, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.05.006
  • Litalien, D., Morin, A. J. S., Gagné, M., Vallerand, R. J., Losier, G. F., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Evidence of a continuum structure of academic self-determination: A two-study test using a bifactor-ESEM representation of academic motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 67–82. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.06.010
  • Longo, Y., Gunz, A., Curtis, G. J., & Farsides, T. (2016). Measuring need satisfaction and frustration in educational and work contexts: The Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (NSFS). Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 295–317. doi:10.1007/s10902-014-9595-3
  • Luyckx, K., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., & Duriez, B. (2009). Basic need satisfaction and identity formation: Bridging self-determination theory and process-oriented identity research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 276–288. doi:10.1037/a0015349
  • Marcoulides, K. M., & Yuan, K.-H. (2017). New ways to evaluate goodness-of-fit: A note on using equivalence testing to assess structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 24, 148–153. doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1225260
  • Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. T. (2007). Applications of latent-variable models in psychology: The need for methodological-substantive synergies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 151–170. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.10.008
  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Grayson, D. (2005). Goodness of fit evaluation in structural equation modeling. In A. Maydeu-Olivares & J. McArdle (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics: A festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 275–340). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu & Bentler (1999). Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
  • Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. J., & Jackson, S. (2010). Introducing a short version of the Physical Self Description Questionnaire: New strategies, short-form evaluative criteria, and applications of factor analyses. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 32, 438–482. doi:10.1123/jsep.32.4.438
  • Marsh, H., Morin, A. J. S., Parker, P., & Kaur, G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85–110. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700
  • Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., & Morin, A. J. S. (2013). Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce vita effects. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1194–1218. doi:10.1037/a0026913
  • Marsh, H. W., Scalas, L. F., & Nagengast, B. (2010). Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles. Psychological Assessment, 22, 366–381. doi:10.1037/a0019225
  • McDonald, R. P. (1970). Theoretical foundations of principal factor analysis, canonical factor analysis, and alpha factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 23, 1–21. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1970.tb00432.x
  • Millsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  • Morin, A. J. S., Arens, A., & Marsh, H. (2016). A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 116–139. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.961800
  • Morin, A. J. S., Arens, K., Tran, A., & Caci, H. (2016). Exploring sources of construct-relevant multidimensionality in psychiatric measurement: A tutorial and illustration using the Composite Scale of Morningness. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 25, 277–288. doi:10.1002/mpr.1485
  • Morin, A. J. S., Boudrias, J.-S., Marsh, H. W., Madore, I., & Desrumeaux, P. (2016). Further reflections on disentengling shape and level effects in person-centered analyses: An illustration exploring the dimensionality of psychological health. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 438–454. doi:10.1080/10705511.2015.1116077
  • Morin, A. J. S., Boudrias, J.-S., Marsh, H. W., McInerney, D. M., Dagenais-Desmarais, V., Madore, I., & Litalien, D. (2017). Complementary variable- and person-centered approaches to the dimensionality of psychometric constructs: Application to psychological wellbeing at work. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32, 395–419. doi:10.1007/s10869-016-9448-7
  • Morin, A. J. S., Maïano, C., White, R. L., Owen, K. B., Tracey, D., Mascret, N., & Lonsdale, C. (2016). English validation of the short form of the Physical Self-Inventory (PSI–S). Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 27, 180–194. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.08.016
  • Morin, A. J. S., Marsh, H. W., & Nagengast, B. (2013). Exploratory structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 395–436). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
  • Morin, A. J. S., Myers, N. D., & Lee, S. (in press). Modern factor analytic techniques: Bifactor models, exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) and bifactor-ESEM. In G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Murray, A. L., & Johnson, W. (2013). The limitations of model fit in comparing the bi-factor versus higher-order models of human cognitive ability structure. Intelligence, 41, 407–422. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.06.004
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • Myers, N. D., Martin, J. J., Ntoumanis, N., Celimli, S., & Bartholomew, K. J. (2014). Exploratory bifactor analysis in sport, exercise, and performance psychology: A substantive-methodological synergy. Sport, Exercice, & Performance Psychology, 3, 258–272. doi:10.1037/spy0000015
  • Neubauer, A. B., & Voss, A. (2016). Validation and revision of a German version of the Balanced Measure of Psychological Needs Scale. Journal of Individual Differences, 37, 56–72. doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000188
  • Neubauer, A. B., & Voss, A. (2017). The structure of need fulfillment: Separating need satisfaction and dissatisfaction on between- and within-person level. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 37, 56–72. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000326
  • Nishimura, T., & Suzuki, T. (2016). Basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration in Japan: Controlling for the Big Five personality traits. Japanese Psychological Research, 58, 320–331. doi:10.1111/jpr.2016.58.issue-4
  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2014). Enhancing women’s economic empowerment through entrepreneurship and business leadership in OECD countries: Background report. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/gender/
  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2017). Gender wage gap (indicator). Retrieved from data.oecd.org/earnwage/gender-wage-gap.htm
  • Reise, S. P. (2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 667–696. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
  • Ren, J., Wu, Y. D., Chan, J. S., & Yan, J. H. (2013). Cognitive aging affects motor performance and learning. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 13, 19–27. doi:10.1111/j.1447-0594.2012.00914.x
  • Rocchi, M., Pelletier, L., Cheung, S., Baxter, D., & Beaudry, S. (2017). Assessing need-supportive and need-thwarting interpersonal behaviours: The Interpersonal Behaviours Questionnaire (IBQ). Personality & Individual Differences, 104, 423–433. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.034
  • Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21, 137–150. doi:10.1037/met0000045
  • Ryan, R. M. (2005). The developmental line of autonomy in the etiology, dynamics, and treatment of borderline personality disorders. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 987–1006. doi:10.1017/S0954579405050467
  • Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., Grolnick, W. S., & La Guardia, J. G. (2006). The significance of autonomy and autonomy support in psychological development and psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Theory and method (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., pp. 795–849). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Sànchez-Oliva, D., Morin, A. J. S., Teixeira, P. J., Carraça, E. V., Palmeira, A. L., & Silva, M. N. (2017). A bifactor-exploratory structural equation modeling representation of the structure of basic psychological needs at work scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 98, 173–187. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2016.12.001
  • Schmitt, D. P., & Allik, J. (2005). Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in 53 nations: Exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 89, 623–642. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.623
  • Sheldon, K. M., & Hilpert, J. (2012). The Balanced Measure of Psychological Needs (BMPN) scale: An alternative domain general measure of need satisfaction. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 439–451. doi:10.1007/s11031-012-9279-4
  • Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107–120. doi:10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0
  • Steenkamp, J. E., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78–90. doi:10.1086/209528
  • Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C. H., & Rosen, C. C. (2016). A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42, 1195–1229. doi:10.1177/0149206316632058
  • Vansteenkiste, M., Niemiec, C. P., & Soenens, B. (2010). The development of the five mini-theories of self-determination theory: An historical overview, emerging trends, and future directions. In S. Karabenick & T. C. Urdan (Eds.), The decade ahead: Theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement (pp. 105–165). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
  • Vansteenkiste, M., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23, 263–280. doi:10.1037/a0032359
  • Vlachopoulos, S. P. (2008). The Basic Psychological Needs in Exercise Scale: Measurement invariance over gender. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 114–135. doi:10.1080/10705510701758398
  • Watkins, D., & Cheung, S. (1995). Culture, gender, and response bias: An analysis of responses to the self-description questionnaire. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 490–504. doi:10.1177/0022022195265003
  • Wilson, P. M., Rogers, W. T., Rodgers, W. M., & Wild, T. C. (2006). The Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise Scale. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 28, 231–251. doi:10.1123/jsep.28.3.231
  • World Economic Forum. (2016). Closing the economic gender gap: Learning from the gender parity task forces. Retrieved from www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_2016_Closing_the_Economic_Gender_Gap.pdf
  • Yuan, K.-H., Chan, W., Marcoulides, G. A., & Bentler, P. M. (2016). Assessing structural equation models by equivalence testing with adjusted fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 319–330. doi:10.1080/10705511.2015.1065414

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.