References
- AERA, APA, & NCME. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
- Bradley, J. V. (1978). Robustness? British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31, 144–152. doi:10.1111/bmsp.1978.31.issue-2
- Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling,: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834
- Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
- Dorans, N. J., & Cook, L. L. (Eds.). (2016). Fairness in educational assessment and measurement. New York, NY: Routledge.
- French, B. F., & Finch, W. H. (2006). Confirmatory factor analytic procedures for the determination of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 378–402. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1303_3
- Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
- MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
- Marcoulides, K. M., & Yuan, K.-H. (2017). New ways to evaluate goodness of fit: A note on using equivalence testing to assess structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 24, 148–153. doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1225260
- Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Joe, H. (2006). Limited information goodness-of-fit testing in multidimensional contingency tables. Psychometrika, 71, 713–732. doi:10.1007/s11336-005-1295-9
- Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543. doi:10.1007/BF02294825
- Millsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2016). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
- Pommerich, M. (2006). Validation of group domain score estimates using a test of domain. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43(2), 97–111.
- R Development Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment forstatistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
- Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
- Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–90. doi:10.1086/209528
- Wicherts, J. M., & Dolan, C. V. (2010). Measurement invariance in confirmatory factor analysis: An illustration using IQ test performance of minorities. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 29(3), 39–47. doi:10.1111/emip.2010.29.issue-3
- Wu, A. D., Li, Z., & Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Decoding the meaning of factorial invariance and updating the practice of multi-group confirmatory factor analysis: A demonstration with TIMMS data. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(3), 1–26.
- Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2004). On chi-square difference and Z Tests in mean and covariance structure analysis when the base model is misspecified. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 737–757. doi:10.1177/0013164404264853
- Yuan, K.-H., & Chan, W. (2016). Measurement invariance via multigroup SEM: Issues and solutions with chi-square difference tests. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 405–426. doi:10.1037/met0000080
- Yuan, K.-H., Chan, W., Marcoulides, G. A., & Bentler, P. M. (2016). Assessing structural equation models by equivalence testing with adjusted fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 23(3), 319–330. doi:10.1080/10705511.2015.1065414