A Systematic Evaluation and Comparison Between Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling and Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling

References

• Asendorpf, J. B., & Van Aken, M. A. G. (2003). Personality-relationship transaction in adolescence: Core versus surface personality characteristics. Journal of Personality, 71, 629–666. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.7104005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438. doi:10.1080/10705510903008204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2010). Bayesian analysis using Mplus: Technical implementation. Manuscript submitted for publication. Retrieved from www.statmodel.com
   Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., & Morin, A. J. S. (2015). Bayesian structural equation modeling with cross-loadings and residual covariances: Comments on Stromeyer et al. Journal of Management, 41(6), 1561–1577. doi:10.1177/0149206315591075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard, J., McCulloch, R., & Meng, X. L. (2000). Modeling covariance matrices in terms of standard deviations and correlations, with application to shrinkage. Statistica Sinica, 10(4), 1281–1311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (2002). Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 605–634. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO-Funf-Faktoren- Inventar nach Costa und McCrae [NEO-Five-Factor-Ques- tionnaire as in Costa and McCrae]. Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W. (1972a). Orthogonal rotation to a partially specified target. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 25, 115–120. doi:10.1111/bmsp.1972.25.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W. (1972b). Oblique rotation to a partially specified target. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 25, 207–212. doi:10.1111/bmsp.1972.25.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W. (2001). An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 111–150. doi:10.1207/S15327906MBR3601_05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celimli., S., Myers, N. D., & Ahn, S. (2018). Geomin versus target rotation in exploratory factor analysis: Correlated factors and large and complex pattern matrices. Proceedings Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, NYC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, D. A., Ciesla, J. A., & Steiger, J. H. (2007). The insidious effects of failing to include design-driven correlated residuals in latent-variable covariance structure analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 381–398. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.4.381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO personality inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 5–13. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5
   Google Scholar
• Cudeck, R., & Browne, M. W. (1983). Cross-validation of covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 147–167. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr1802_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cudeck, R., & MacCallum, R. (Eds). (2007). Factor analysis at 100: Historical developments and future directions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cudeck, R., & O’Dell, L. L. (1994). Applications of standard error estimates in unrestricted factor analysis: Significance tests for factor loadings and correlations. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 475–487. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bondt, N., & Van Petegem, P. (2015). Psychometric evaluation of the Overexcitability Questionnaire-Two applying Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling (BSEM) and multiple-group BSEM-based alignment with approximate measurement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1963. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depaoli, S., & van de Schoot, R. (2017). Improving Transparency and Replication in Bayesian Statistics: The WAMBS-Checklist. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 240–261. doi:10.1037/met0000065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong, T. C. T., & Ho, R. T. H. (2013). Factor analyses of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: A Bayesian structural equation modeling approach. Quality of Life Research, 22(10), 2857–2863. doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0169-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2004). Bayesian data analysis (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A., & Rubin, D. B. (2013). Bayesian data analysis (3d ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman &Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Geman, S., & Geman, D. (1984). Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6, 721–741. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golay, P., Reverte, I., Rossier, J., Favez, N., & Lecerf, T. (2013). Further insights on the French WISC–IV factor structure through Bayesian structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 25(2), 496–508. doi:10.1037/a0030676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, K. J., Mazza, G. L., & Davoudzadeh, P. (2016). Model Selection in Finite Mixture Models: A k-Fold Cross-Validation Approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 24(2), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruvaeus, G. T. (1970). A general approach to Procrustes pattern rotation. Psychometrika, 35, 493–505. doi:10.1007/BF02291822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gucciardi, D. F., & Zyphur, M. J. (2016). Exploratory structural equation modelling and Bayesian estimation. In N. Ntoumanis & N. D. Myers (Eds.), An introduction to intermediate and advanced statistical analyses for sport and exercise scientists (pp. pp.172–194). Chichester, England: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hamra, G. B., MacLehose, R. F., & Cole, S. R. (2013). Sensitivity analyses for sparse-data problems—Using weakly informative Bayesian priors. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 24, 233–239. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e318280db1d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horst, A. P. (1941). A non-graphical method for transforming an arbitrary factor matrix into a simple structure factor matrix. Psychometrika, 6, 79–99. doi:10.1007/BF02292176
   Google Scholar
• Jennrich, R. I., & Sampson, P. F. (1966). Rotation for simple loadings. Psychometrika, 31, 313–323. doi:10.1007/BF02289465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34, 183–202. doi:10.1007/BF02289343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D., & Depaoli, S. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling (pp. pp. 650–673). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. (2014). Bayesian statistics for the social sciences. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Z., Chow, S., & Loken, E. (2017). A comparison of Bayesian and frequentist model selection methods for factor analysis models. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 361–381. doi:10.1037/met0000145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Z.-H., Chow, S.-M., & Loken, E. (2016). Bayesian Factor Analysis as a Variable-Selection Problem: Alternative Priors and Consequences. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(4), 519–539. doi:10.1080/00273171.2016.1168279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Edwards, M. C., & Cai, L. (2012). Hopes and cautions in implementing Bayesian structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 340–345. doi:10.1037/a0027131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L. B. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490–504. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., & Tucker, L. R. (1991). Representing sources of error in the common-factor model: Implications for theory and practice. Quantitative Methods in Psychology, 109(3), 502–511.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York, NY: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Grayson, D. (2005). Goodness of fit in structural equation models. In A. Maydeu-Olivares & J. J. McArdle (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics (pp. 275–340). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Guo, J., Parker, P. D., Nagengast, B., Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., & Dicke, T. (2017). What to do When Scalar Invariance Fails: The Extended Alignment Method for Multi-Group Factor Analysis Comparison of Latent Means Across Many Groups. Psychological Methods, 21(4), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B. O., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22(3), 471–491. doi:10.1037/a0019227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J. S., Parker, P. D., & Kaur, G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10(1), 85–110. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A. J. S., & Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 439–476. doi:10.1080/10705510903008220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., & Morin, A. J. S. (2013). Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce vita effects. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1194–1218. doi:10.1037/a0026913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2006). Integration of multidimensional self-concept and core personality constructs: Construct validation and relations to well-being and achievement. Journal of Personality, 74(2), 403–456. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00380.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H.W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis- testing approaches to cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu & Bentler’s (1999). Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In L. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 139–153). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa P. T. Jr. (1989). Rotation to maximize the construct validity of factors in the NEO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 107–124. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2401_7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (1985). Factor analysis and related methods. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (2005). Semiconfirmatory factor analysis: The example of anxiety and depression. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 163–172. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1201_9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O. (2010). Bayesian analysis In Mplus: A brief introduction. Manuscript submitted for publication. Retrieved from www.statmodel.com
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 313–335. doi:10.1037/a0026802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8 ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, N. D., Ahn, S., & Jin, Y. (2013). Rotation to a partially specified target matrix in exploratory factor analysis: How many targets?. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(1), 131–147. doi:10.1080/10705511.2013.742399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, N. D., Ahn, S., Lu, M., Celimli, S., & Zopluoglu, C. (2017). Reordering and Reflecting Factors for Simulation Studies With Exploratory Factor Analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(1), 112–128. doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1230721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, N. D., Jin, Y., Ahn, S., Celimli, S., & Zopluoglu, C. (2015). Rotation to a partially specified target matrix in exploratory factor analysis in practice. Behavior Research Methods, 47(2), 494–505. doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0486-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myung, I. J. (2000). The importance of complexity in model selection. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 190–204. doi:10.1006/jmps.1999.1283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Press, S. J. (2003). Subjective and objective Bayesian statistics: Principles, models, and applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rindskopf, D. (2012). Next steps in Bayesian structural equation models: Comments on, variations of, and extensions to Muthén and Asparouhov (2012). Psychological Methods, 17(3), 336–339. doi:10.1037/a0027130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheines, R., Hoijtink, H., & Boomsma, A. (1999). Bayesian estimation and testing of structural equation models. Psychometrika, 64, 37–52. doi:10.1007/BF02294318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromeyer, W. R., Miller, J. W., Sriramachandramurthy, R., & DeMartino, R. (2015). The Prowess and Pitfalls of Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling: Important Considerations for Management Research. Journal of Management, 41(2), 491–520. doi:10.1177/0149206314551962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trautwein, U., Neumann, M., Nagy, G., Lüdtke, O., & Maaz, K. (Eds). (2010). Schulleistungen von Abiturienten: Die neu geordnete gymna-siale Oberstufe auf dem Prüfstand. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, L. R. (1944). A semi-analytical method of factorial rotation to simple structure. Psychometrika, 9, 43–68. doi:10.1007/BF02288713
   Google Scholar
• Van de Schoot, R., Winter, S. D., Ryan, O., Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M., & Depaoli, S. (2017). A systematic review of Bayesian articles in psychology: The last 25 years. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 217–239. doi:10.1037/met0000100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucchini, W. (2000). An introduction to model selection. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 41–61. doi:10.1006/jmps.1999.1276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zyphur, M. J., & Oswald, F. L. (2013). Bayesian Estimation and Inference: A User’s Guide. Journal of Management, 41(2), 390–420. doi:10.1177/0149206313501200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar