Assessing Model Fit in Structural Equation Modeling Using Appropriate Test Statistics

References

• Amemiya, Y., & Anderson, T. (1990). Asymptotic chi-square tests for a large class of factor analysis models. The Annals of Statistics, 18, 1453–1463. doi:10.1214/aos/1176347760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. W., & Darling, D. A. (1952). Asymptotic theory of certain goodness-of-fit criteria based on stochastic processes. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23, 193–212. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729437
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. W., & Darling, D. A. (1954). A test of goodness of fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 765–769. doi:10.1080/01621459.1954.10501232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arshad, M., Rasool, M. T., & Ahmad, M. I. (2003). Anderson Darling and modified Anderson Darling tests for generalized Pareto distributions. Pakistan Journal of Applied Sciences, 3, 85–88. doi:10.3923/jas.2003.85.88
   Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2010). Simple second order chi-square correction (Unpublished manuscript). Retrieved from www.statmodel.com/download/WLSMV_new_chi21.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Babu, G. J., & Rao, C. R. (2004). Goodness-of-fit test when parameters are estimated. Sankhya, 66, 63–74.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 3, 77–85. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1950.tb00285.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Yuan, K.-H. (1999). Structural equation modeling with small samples: Test statistics. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 181–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beran, R., & Srivastava, M. S. (1985). Bootstrap tests and confidence regions for functions of a covariance matrix. The Annals of Statistics, 13, 95–115. doi:10.1214/aos/1176346579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. (1993). Bootstrapping goodness of fit measures in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 111–135). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. (1992). Bootstrapping goodness of fit measures in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 205–209. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Agostino, R., & Stephens, M. A. (1986). Goodness-of-fit techniques. New York, NY: Marcel Decker.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, L., Yang, M., & Marcoulides, K. M. (2018). SEM with many variables: Issues and developments. Quantitative Psychology and Measurement Section, Frontiers in Psychology. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00580
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics, 7, 1–26. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K. (2001). The impact of non-normality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data. Psychological Methods, 6, 352–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foldnes, N., & Grønneberg, S. (2018). Approximating test statistics using eigenvalue block averaging. Structural Equation Modeling, 25, 101–114. doi:10.1080/10705511.2017.1373021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foldnes, N., & Olsson, U. H. (2015). Correcting too much or too little? The performance of three chi-square corrections. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 533–543. doi:10.1080/00273171.2015.1036964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouladi, R. T. (2000). Performance of modified test statistics in covariance and correlation structure analysis under conditions of multivariate nonnormality. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 356–410. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0703_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grønneberg, S., & Foldnes, N. (2019). Testing Model Fit by Bootstrap Selection. Structural Equation Modeling, 26, 182–190. doi:10.1080/10705511.2018.1503543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., Bentler, P. M., & Kano, Y. (1992). Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted? Psychological Bulletin, 112, 351–362.
   Google Scholar
• Lawley, D. N., & Maxwell, A. E. (1971). Factor analysis as a statistical method (2nd ed.). London: Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• Lilliefors, H. W. (1967). On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 399–402. doi:10.1080/01621459.1967.10482916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcoulides, G. A. (1990). Evaluation of confirmatory factor analytic and structural equation models using goodness-of-fit indices. Psychological Reports, 67, 669–670. doi:10.2466/PR0.67.6.669-670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcoulides, K. M., & Falk, C. F. (2018). Model specification searches in structural equation modeling with R. Structural Equation Modeling, 25, 484–491. doi:10.1080/10705511.2017.1409074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcoulides, K. M., & Yuan, K. H. (2017). New ways to evaluate goodness of fit: A note on using equivalence testing to assess structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 24, 148–153. doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1225260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micceri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 156–166. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2018). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nevitt, J., & Hancock, G. R. (2004). Evaluating small sample approaches for model test statistics in structural equation modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 439–478. doi:10.1207/S15327906MBR3903_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2010). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Razali, N. W., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparison of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors, and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2, 22–33.
   Google Scholar
• Revelle, W. (2015b) Package “psych.” Retrieved from http://org/r/psych-manual.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1988). Scaling corrections for chi-square statistics in covariance structure analysis. In ASA 1988 proceedings of the business and economic statistics section (pp. 308–313). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
   Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980, May 30). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual Spring Meeting of the Psychometric Society in Iowa City.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, M. A. (1974). EDF statistics for goodness-of-fit and some comparisons. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 730–737. doi:10.1080/01621459.1974.10480196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H. (2018). Approximations to the distribution of a test statistic in covariance structure analysis: A comprehensive study. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 17, 334–362. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12123
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H., & Lin, J. (2016). A scaled F distribution as an approximation to the distribution of test statistics in covariance structure analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 409–421. doi:10.1080/10705511.2015.1057733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M., Jiang, G., & Yuan, K. H. (2018). The performance of ten modified rescaled statistics as the number of variables increases. Structural Equation Modeling, 25, 414–438. doi:10.1080/10705511.2017.1389612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazici, B., & Yolacan, S. (2007). A comparison of various tests of normality. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 77, 175–183. doi:10.1080/10629360600678310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K. H., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological Methodology, 30, 165–200. doi:10.1111/0081-1750.00078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K. H., Yang, M., & Jiang, G. (2017). Empirically corrected rescaled statistics for SEM with small N and large p. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 52, 673–698. doi:10.1080/00273171.2017.1354759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2005). Asymptotic robustness of the normal theory likelihood ratio statistic for two-level covariance structure models. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 94, 328–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yung, Y. F., & Bentler, P. M. (1996). Bootstrapping techniques in analysis of mean and covariance structures. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 195–226). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar