Latent Moderation Analysis: A Factor Score Approach

References

• Acito, F., & Anderson, R. D. (1986). A simulation study of factor score indeterminacy. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 111–118. doi:10.1177/002224378602300203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguinis, H., Beaty, J. C., Boik, R. J., & Pierce, C. A. (2005). Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: A 30-year review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 94–107. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P. (1983). Issues in the application of covariance structure analysis: A further comment. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 449–450. doi:10.1086/jcr.1983.9.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartholomew, D. J. (1981). Posterior analysis of the factor model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 34, 93–99. doi:10.1111/bmsp.1981.34.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, M. S. (1937). The statistical conception of mental factors. British Journal of Psychology: General Section, 28, 97–104. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1937.tb00863.x
   Google Scholar
• Blanca, M. J., Arnau, J., López-Montiel, D., Bono, R., & Bendayan, R. (2013). Skewness and kurtosis in real data samples. Methodology, 9, 78–84. doi:10.1027/1614-2241/a000057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohrnstedt, G. W., & Marwell, G. (1978). The reliability of products of two random variables. Sociological Methodology, 9, 254–273. doi:10.2307/270812
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1996). An alternative two stage least squares (2SLS) estimator for latent variable equations. Psychometrika, 61, 109–121. doi:10.1007/BF02296961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, J. R., & Jones, L. E. (1983). Analysis of multiplicative combination rules when the causal variables are measured with error. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 549–562. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.93.3.549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, M. K., Zhang, Z., & Yuan, K. H. (2017). Univariate and multivariate skewness and kurtosis for measuring nonnormality: Prevalence, influence and estimation. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 1716–1735. doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0800-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cham, H., West, S. G., Ma, Y., & Aiken, L. S. (2012). Estimating latent variable interactions with nonnormal observed data: A comparison of four approaches. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 840–876. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.732901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champoux, J. E., & Peters, W. S. (1987). Form, effect size and power in moderated regression analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 60, 243–255. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1987.tb00257.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaplin, W. F. (1991). The next generation of moderator research in personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 59, 143–178. doi:10.1111/jopy.1991.59.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, I., Koo, M., & Choi, J. A. (2007). Individual differences in analytic versus holistic thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 691–705. doi:10.1177/0146167206298568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenders, G., Batista-Foguet, J. M., & Saris, W. E. (2008). Simple, efficient and distribution-free approach to interaction effects in complex structural equation models. Quality & Quantity, 42, 369–396. doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9050-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, D., Ciesla, J., & Steiger, J. (2007). The insidious effects of failing to include design-driven correlated residuals in latent-variable covariance structure analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 381–398. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.4.381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, D. A., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Manifest variable path analysis: Potentially serious and misleading consequences due to uncorrected measurement error. Psychological Methods, 19, 300–315. doi:10.1037/a0033805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croon, M. (2002). Using predicted latent scores in general latent structure models. In G. Marcoulides & I. Moustaki (Eds.), Latent variable and latent structure modeling (pp. 195–223). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Devlieger, I., Mayer, A., & Rosseel, Y. (2016). Hypothesis testing using factor score regression: A comparison of four methods. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76, 741–770. doi:10.1177/0013164415607618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlieger, I., & Rosseel, Y. (2017). Factor score path analysis. Methodology, 13, 31–38. doi:10.1027/1614-2241/a000130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, W. P., & Kemery, E. R. (1988). Effects of predictor intercorrelations and reliabilities on moderated multiple regression. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 248–258. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(88)90029-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2005). Sensitivity of fit indexes to misspecified structural or measurement model components: Rationale of two-index strategy revisited. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 343–367. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1203_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisicaro, S. A., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (1992). Power and reliability: The case of homogeneous true score regression across treatments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 505–511. doi:10.1177/0013164492052003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9, 466–491. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foldnes, N., & Hagtvet, K. A. (2014). The choice of product indicators in latent variable interaction models: Post hoc analyses. Psychological Methods, 19, 444–457. doi:10.1037/a0035728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C. (1983). Issues in the application of covariance structure analysis: A comment. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 443–447. doi:10.1086/jcr.1983.9.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagne, P., & Hancock, G. R. (2006). Measurement model quality, sample size, and solution propriety in confirmatory factor models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 65–83. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr4101_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1984). On the meaning of within-factor correlated measurement errors. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 572–580. doi:10.1086/jcr.1984.11.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice, J. W. (2001). Computing and evaluating factor scores. Psychological Methods, 6, 430–450. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harring, J. R., Weiss, B. A., & Hsu, J. C. (2012). A comparison of methods for estimating quadratic effects in nonlinear structural equation models. Psychological Methods, 17, 193–214. doi:10.1037/a0027539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hays, R. D., & DiMatteo, M. R. (1987). A short-form measure of loneliness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51, 69–81. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5101_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermida, R. (2015). The problem of allowing correlated errors in structural equation modeling: Concerns and considerations. Computational Methods in Social Sciences, 3, 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogland, J. J., & Boomsma, A. (1998). Robustness studies in covariance structure modeling An overview and a meta-analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 26, 329–367. doi:10.1177/0049124198026003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyle, R. H., & Kenny, D. A. (1999). Sample size, reliability, and tests of statistical mediation. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 195–222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1995). Measurement error in the analysis of interaction effects between continuous predictors using multiple regression: Multiple indicator and structural equation approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 348–357. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackman, M. G. A., Leite, W. L., & Cochrane, D. J. (2011). Estimating latent variable interactions with the unconstrained approach: A comparison of methods to form product indicators for large, unequal numbers of items. Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 274–288. doi:10.1080/10705511.2011.557342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., & Brett, J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 307–321. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Yang, F. (1996). Nonlinear structural equation models: The Kenny-Judd model with interaction effects. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Techniques, (pp. 57–88). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kelava, A., Werner, C. S., Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., Zapf, D., Ma, Y., … West, S. G. (2011). Advanced nonlinear latent variable modeling: Distribution analytic LMS and QML estimators of interaction and quadratic effects. Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 465–491. doi:10.1080/10705511.2011.582408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (1984). Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 201–210. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.96.1.201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65, 457–474. doi:10.1007/BF02296338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, A. G., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Quasi maximum likelihood estimation of structural equation models with multiple interaction and quadratic effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 647–674. doi:10.1080/00273170701710205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, A. G., & Stoolmiller, M. (2003). Detecting latent interaction effects in behavioral data. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 113–126.
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, J. L. Y., & Chan, W. (2018). Variable system: An alternative approach for the analysis of mediated moderation. Psychological Methods, 23, 262–277. doi:10.1037/met0000160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, R., Edwards, B. D., & Cortina, J. (2009). Correlated residuals among items in the estimation of measurement models. In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity, and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 195–214). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lastovicka, J. L., & Thamodaran, K. (1991). Common factor score estimates in multiple regression problems. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 105–112. doi:10.1177/002224379102800109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledgerwood, A., & Shrout, P. E. (2011). The trade-off between accuracy and precision in latent variable models of mediation processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1174–1188. doi:10.1037/a0024776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, G. C., Wen, Z., Marsh, H. W., & Lin, H. S. (2010). Structural equation models of latent interactions: Clarification of orthogonalizing and double-mean-centering strategies. Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 374–391. doi:10.1080/10705511.2010.488999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, T. D., Bovaird, J. A., & Widaman, K. F. (2006). On the merits of orthogonalizing powered and product terms: Implications for modeling interactions among latent variables. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 497–519. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1304_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, I. R., Kwan, E., Thomas, D. R., & Cedzynski, M. (2011). Two new methods for estimating structural equation models: An illustration and a comparison with two established methods. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28, 258–268. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubinski, D., & Humphreys, L. G. (1990). Assessing spurious “moderator effects”: Illustrated substantively with the hypothesized (“synergistic”) relation between spatial and mathematical ability. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 385–393. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.3.385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao, X., Harring, J. R., & Hancock, G. R. (2015). A note on the specification of error structures in latent interaction models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75, 5–21. doi:10.1177/0013164414537491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maraun, M. D. (1996). Metaphor taken as math: Indeterminancy in the factor analysis model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, 517–538. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3104_6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., & Hau, K. T. (2004). Structural equation models of latent interactions: Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological Methods, 9, 275–300. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.9.3.275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., & Hau, K. T. (2006). Structural equation models of latent interaction and quadratic effects. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 225–265). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., Hau, K. T., Little, T. D., Bovaird, J. A., & Widaman, K. F. (2007). Unconstrained structural equation models of latent interactions: Contrasting residual-and mean-centered approaches. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 570–580. doi:10.1080/10705510701303921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., & Nagengast, B., & Hau, K.-T. (2012). Structural equation models of latent interaction. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 436 – 458). New York, NY: Guilford Press
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory. A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Moulder, B. C., & Algina, J. (2002). Comparison of methods for estimating and testing latent variable interactions. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 1–19. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0901_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, J. C. K., & Chen, S. X. (2019). Saving enviers from feeling lonely: Holistic versus analytic thinking moderates envious loneliness. Article presented at 13th Biennial Asian Association of Social Psychology Conference, Taipei, Taiwan.
   Google Scholar
• Ping Jr., R. A., Jr. (1996b). Latent variable regression: A technique for estimating interaction and quadratic coefficients. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, 95–120. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3101_6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ping, R. A., Jr. (1995). A parsimonious estimating technique for interaction and quadratic latent variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 336–347. doi:10.1177/002224379503200308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ping, R. A., Jr. (1996a). Latent variable interaction and quadratic effect estimation: A two-step technique using structural equation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 166–175. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saris, W. E., Batista-Foguet, J. M., & Coenders, G. (2007). Selection of indicators for the interaction term in structural equation models with interaction. Quality & Quantity, 41, 55–72. doi:10.1007/s11135-005-3956-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savalei, V. (2019). A comparison of several approaches for controlling measurement error in small samples. Psychological Methods, 24, 352–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacker, R. E. (2002). Latent variable interaction modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 40–54. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0901_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, R., & Goldstein, S. M. (2006). Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: Looking back and forward. Journal of Operations Management, 24, 148–169. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2005.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrondal, A., & Laake, P. (2001). Regression among factor scores. Psychometrika, 66, 563–575. doi:10.1007/BF02296196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. H., Parrott, W. G., Diener, E. F., Hoyle, R. H., & Kim, S. H. (1999). Dispositional envy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1007–1020. doi:10.1177/01461672992511008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, G. H. (1934). Hotelling’s method modified to give Spearman’s g. Journal of Educational Psychology, 25, 366–374. doi:10.1037/h0072648
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, G. H. (1938). Methods of estimating mental factors. Nature, 141, 246. doi:10.1038/141246a0
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L. L. (1935). The vectors of mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Umbach, N., Naumann, K., Brandt, H., & Kelava, A. (2017). Fitting nonlinear structural equation models in R with package nlsem. Journal of Statistical Software, 77, 1–20. doi:10.18637/jss.v077.i07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valluzzi, J. L., Larson, S. L., & Miller, G. E. (2003). Indications and limitations of structural equation modeling in complex surveys: Implications for an application in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). 2003 JSM Proceedings of the American Statistical Associations: Section on survey research methods indications (pp. 4345–4352). San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., Wen, Z., Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. T. (2013). A comparison of strategies for forming product indicators for unequal numbers of items in structural equation models of latent interactions. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 551–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, F. (1998). Modeling interaction and nonlinear effects: A step-by-step LISREL example. In R. E. Schumacker & G. A. Marcoulides (Eds.), Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling (pp. 17–42). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar