Identifying Heterogeneity in Dynamic Panel Models with Individual Parameter Contribution Regression

References

• Allison, P. D., Williams, R., & Moral-Benito, E. (2017). Maximum likelihood for cross-lagged panel models with fixed effects. Socius, 3, 1–17. doi:10.1177/2378023117710578
   Google Scholar
• Biesanz, J. C. (2012). Autoregressive longitudinal models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 459–471). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Brand, J. E. (2010). A general panel model with random and fixed effects: A structural equations approach. Social Forces, 89, 1–34. doi:10.1353/sof.2010.0072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Brandmaier, A. M., Driver, C. C., & Voelkle, M. C. (2018). Recursive partitioning in continuous time analysis. In K. van Montfort, J. H. L. Oud, & M. C. Voelkle (Eds.), Continuous time modeling in the behavioral and related sciences (pp. 259–282). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brandmaier, A. M., Prindle, J. J., McArdle, J. J., & Lindenberger, U. (2016). Theory-guided exploration with structural equation model forests. Psychological Methods, 21, 566–582. doi:10.1037/met0000090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandmaier, A. M., von Oertzen, T., McArdle, J. J., & Lindenberger, U. (2013). Structural equation model trees. Psychological Methods, 18, 71–86. doi:10.1037/a0030001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Demidenko, E. (2013). Mixed models: Theory and applications with R (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, C. C., & Voelkle, M. C. (2018). Hierarchical Bayesian continuous time dynamic modeling. Psychological Methods, 23, 774–779. doi:10.1037/met0000168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, M. R. W., Yang, N., Jaki, T., Feaster, D. J., Lamont, A. E., Wilson, D. K., & van Horn, M. L. (2013). Finite mixtures for simultaneously modelling differential effects and non-normal distributions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48, 816–844. doi:10.1080/00273171.2013.830065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37, 424–438. doi:10.2307/1912791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halaby, C. N. (2004). Panel models in sociological research: Theory into practice. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 507–544. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamaker, E. L., Kuiper, R. M., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20, 102–116. doi:10.1037/a0038889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, C. (2014). Analysis of panel data (3rd ed.). Cambridge, UK: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jedidi, K., Jagpal, H. S., & DeSarbo, W. S. (1997). Finite-mixture structural equation models for response-based segmentation and unobserved heterogeneity. Marketing Science, 16, 39–59. doi:10.1287/mksc.16.1.39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10, 21–39. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L. B. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490–504. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnus, J. R., & Neudecker, H. (2019). Matrix differential calculus with applications in statistics and econometrics (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781119541219
   Google Scholar
• McArdle, J. J. (2001). A latent difference score approach to longitudinal dynamic structural analysis. In R. Cudeck, S. Du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling (pp. 341–380). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Merkle, E. C., Fan, J., & Zeileis, A. (2014). Testing for measurement invariance with respect to an ordinal variable. Psychometrika, 79, 569–584. doi:10.1007/s11336-013-9376-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkle, E. C., & Zeileis, A. (2013). Tests of measurement invariance without subgroups: A generalization of classical methods. Psychometrika, 78, 59–82. doi:10.1007/s11336-012-9302-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., & Shedden, K. (1999). Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm. Biometrics, 55, 463–469. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.1999.00463.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, M. C., Hunter, M. D., Pritkin, J., Zahery, M., Brick, T. R., Kirkpatrick, R. M., … Boker, S. M. (2015). OpenMx 2.0: Extended structural equation and statistical modeling. Psychometrika, 81, 535–549. doi:10.1007/s11336-014-9435-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neudecker, H., & Satorra, A. (1991). Linear structural relations: Gradient and Hessian of the fitting function. Statistics & Probability Letters, 11, 57–61. doi:10.1016/0167-7152(91)90178-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberski, D. L. (2013). A flexible method to explain differences in structural equation model parameters over subgroups. Retrieved from http://daob.nl/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/SEM-IPC-manuscript-new.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oud, J. H. L. (2007). Continuous time modeling of reciprocal relationships in the cross-lagged panel design. In S. M. Boker & M. J. Wenger (Eds.), Data analytic techniques for dynamic systems in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 87–129). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Oud, J. H. L., & Delsing, M. J. M. H. (2010). Continuous time modeling of panel data by means of SEM. In K. van Montfort, J. H. L. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Longitudinal research with latent variables (pp. 201–244). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Oud, J. H. L., & Jansen, R. A. R. G. (2000). Continuous time state space modeling of panel data by means of SEM. Psychometrika, 65, 199–215. doi:10.1007/BF02294374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., & Sörbom, D. (1987). The detection and correction of specification errors in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 17, 105–129. doi:10.2307/271030
   Google Scholar
• Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., & van der Veld, W. M. (2009). Testing structural equation models or detection of misspecifications? Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 561–582. doi:10.1080/10705510903203433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satorra, A. (1989). Alternative test criteria in covariance structure analysis: A unified approach. Psychometrika, 54, 131–151. doi:10.1007/BF02294453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satorra, A. (1992). Asymptotic robust inferences in the analysis of mean and covariance structures. Sociological Methodology, 22, 249–278. doi:10.2307/270998
   Google Scholar
• Savalei, V. (2014). Understanding robust corrections in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 21, 149–160. doi:10.1080/10705511.2013.824793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuurman, N. K., Ferrer, E., de Boer-Sonnenschein, M., & Hamaker, E. L. (2016). How to compare cross-lagged associations in a multilevel autoregressive model. Psychological Methods, 21, 206–221. doi:10.1037/met0000062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, J. D., & Willet, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sörbom, D. (1974). A general method for studying differences in factor means and factor structure between groups. British Journal of Mathematics and Statistical Psychology, 27, 229–239. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1974.tb00543.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörbom, D. (1989). Model modification. Psychometrika, 54, 371–384. doi:10.1007/BF02294623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 58, 267–288. doi:10.1111/rssb.1996.58.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Usami, S., Hayes, T., & McArdle, J. (2017). Fitting structural equation model trees and latent growth curve mixture models in longitudinal designs: The influence of model misspecification. Structural Equation Modeling, 24, 585–598. doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1266267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Montfort, K., Oud, J. H. L., & Voelkle, M. C. (2018). Continuous time modeling in the behavioral and related sciences. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Voelkle, M. C., Oud, J. H. L., Davidov, E., & Schmidt, P. (2012). An SEM approach to continuous time modeling of panel data: Relating authoritarianism and anomia. Psychological Methods, 17, 176–192. doi:10.1037/a0027543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voelkle, M. C., Oud, J. H. L., von Oertzen, T., & Lindenberger, U. (2012). Maximum likelihood dynamic factor modeling for arbitrary N and T using SEM. Structural Equation Modeling, 19, 329–350. doi:10.1080/10705511.2012.687656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T., Merkle, E. C., & Zeileis, A. (2014). Score-based tests of measurement invariance: Use in practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 438. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T., Strobl, C., Zeileis, A., & Merkle, E. C. (2018). Score-based tests of differential item functioning via pairwise maximum likelihood estimation. Psychometrika, 83, 132–155. doi:10.1007/s11336-017-9591-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. (1984). Asymptotic theory for econometricians. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2007). Structural equation modeling. In C. R. Rao & S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of statistics (Vol. 26, pp. 297–358). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Zeileis, A. (2005). A unified approach to structural change tests based on ML scores, F statistics, and OLS residuals. Econometric Reviews, 24, 445–466. doi:10.1080/07474930500406053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeileis, A., & Hornik, K. (2007). Generalized M-fluctuation tests for parameter instability. Statistica Neerlandica, 61, 488–508. doi:10.1111/stan.2007.61.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zyphur, M. J., Allison, P. D., Tay, L., Voelkle, M. C., Preacher, K. J., Zhang, Z., … Diener, E. (2019). From data to causes I: Building a general cross-lagged panel model (GCLM). Organizational Research Methods. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1094428119847278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zyphur, M. J., Voelkle, M. C., Tay, L., Allison, P. D., Preacher, K. J., Zhang, Z., … Diener, E. (2019). From data to causes II: Comparing approaches to panel data analysis. Organizational Research Methods. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1094428119847280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar