Evaluation of Six Effect Size Measures of Measurement Non-Invariance for Continuous Outcomes

References

• Borsboom, D. (2006). When does measurement invariance matter? Medical Care, 44, S176–S181. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000245143.08679.cc
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, R. P., Counsell, A., & Flora, D. B. (2016). It might not make a big DIF: Improved differential test functioning statistics that account for sampling variability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76, 114–140. doi:10.1177/0013164415584576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, D. A., Listro, C. J., Lo, S. L., Durbin, C. E., Donnellan, M. B., & Neppl, T. K. (2016). Measurement invariance and child temperament: An evaluation of sex and informant differences on the child behavior questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 28, 1646–1662. doi:10.1037/pas0000299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997–1003. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, L. M., Schafer, J. L., & Kam, C.-M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6, 330–351. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, E. S. (2011). Testing measurement invariance using MIMIC: Likelihood ratio test and modification indices with a critical value adjustment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). College Station, TX: Texas A&M University.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 746–759. doi:10.1177/0013164496056005002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, R. E. (2007). Effect magnitude: A different focus. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 137, 1634–1646. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2006.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, M. H. C., & Kwok, O. (2016). Estimating standardized effect sizes for two- and three-level partially nested data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 740–756. doi:10.1080/00273171.2016.1231606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade, A. W. (2010). A taxonomy of effect size measures for the differential item functioning of items and scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 728–743. doi:10.1037/a0018966.
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543. doi:10.1007/BF02294825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203821961
   Google Scholar
• Millsap, R. E., & Olivera-Aguilar, M. (2012). Investigating measurement invariance using confirmatory factor analysis. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 380–392). New York, NY: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Millsap, R. E., & Kwok, O.-M. (2004). Evaluating the impact of partial factorial invariance on selection in two populations. Psychological Methods, 9, 93–115. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.9.1.93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, C. D., Bradburn, J., Olenick, J., Bialko, C., & Drasgow, F. (2019). How big are my effects? Examining the magnitude of effect sizes in studies of measurement equivalence. Organizational Research Methods, 22, 678–709. doi:10.1177/1094428118761122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, C. D., & Drasgow, F. (2011). Effect size indices for analyses of measurement equivalence: Understanding the practical importance of differences between groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 966–980. doi:10.1037/a0022955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16, 93–115. doi:10.1037/a0022658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, I., Wolchik, S., Mazza, G., Gunn, H., Tein, J.-Y., Berkel, C., … Porter, M. (2019, online publication). Randomized effectiveness trial of the new beginnings program for divorced families with children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 1–19. doi:10.1080/15374416.2018.1540008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Drasgow, F. (2006). Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Toward a unified strategy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1292–1306. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L. L. (1947). Multiple factor analysis. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, M., & Millsap, R. E. (2007). Detecting violations of factorial invariance using data-based specification searches: A Monte Carlo study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 435–463. doi:10.1080/10705510701301677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar