References
- Amemiya, Y., & Anderson, T. W. (1990). Asymptotic chi-square tests for a large class of factor analysis models. The Annals of Statistics, 18, 1453–1463. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176347760
- Anderson, T. W., & Amemiya, Y. (1988). The asymptotic normal distribution of estimators in factor analysis under general conditions. The Annals of Statistics, 16, 759–771. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176350834
- Arias, V. B., Ponce, F. P., Martínez-Molina, A., Arias, B., & Núñez, D. (2016). General and specific attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder factors of children 4 to 6 years of age: An exploratory structural equation modeling approach to assessing symptom multidimensionality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125, 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000115
- Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008204
- Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., & Morin, A. J. S. (2015). Bayesian structural equation modeling with cross-loadings and residual covariances. Journal of Management, 41, 1561–1577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315591075
- Auerswald, M., & Moshagen, M. (2019). How to determine the number of factors to retain in exploratory factor analysis: A comparison of extraction methods under realistic conditions. Psychological Methods, 24, 468–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000200
- Barendse, M. T., Oort, F. J., & Timmerman, M. E. (2014). Using exploratory factor analysis to determine the dimensionality of discrete responses. Structural Equation Modeling, 22, 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.934850
- Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 3, 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.1950.3.issue-2
- Bartlett, M. S. (1951). The effect of standardization on a χ2 approximation in factor analysis. Biometrika, 38, 337–344. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/38.3-4.337
- Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
- Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
- Bollen, K. A., Harden, J. J., Ray, S., & Zavisca, J. (2014). BIC and alternative bayesian information criteria in the selection of structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 21, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.856691
- Braeken, J., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). An empirical kaiser criterion. Psychological Methods, 22, 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000074
- Briggs, N. E., & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Recovery of weak common factors by maximum likelihood and ordinary least squares estimation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 25–56. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3801_2
- Browne, M. W. (1987). Robustness of statistical inference in factor analysis and related models. Biometrika, 74, 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/74.2.375
- Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
- Cain, M. K., Zhang, Z., & Yuan, K.-H. (2017). Univariate and multivariate skewness and kurtosis for measuring nonnormality: Prevalence, influence and estimation. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 1716–1735. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0814-1
- Clark, D. A., & Bowles, R. P. (2018). Model fit and item factor analysis: Overfactoring, underfactoring, and a program to guide interpretation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53, 544–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1461058
- Dinno, A. (2009). Exploring the sensitivity of horn’s parallel analysis to the distributional form of random data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 362–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170902938969
- Dobriban, E., & Owen, A. B. (2019). Deterministic parallel analysis: An improved method for selecting factors and principal components. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 81, 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssb.12301
- Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
- Garrido, L. E., Abad, F. J., & Ponsoda, V. (2013). A new look at horn’s parallel analysis with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 18, 454–474. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030005
- Garrido, L. E., Abad, F. J., & Ponsoda, V. (2016). Are fit indices really fit to estimate the number of factors with categorical variables? Some cautionary findings via monte carlo simulation. Psychological Methods, 21, 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000064
- Green, S. B., Levy, R., Thompson, M. S., Lu, M., & Lo, W.-J. (2011). A proposed solution to the problem with using completely random data to assess the number of factors with parallel analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164411422252
- Guttman, L. (1954). Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis. Psychometrika, 19, 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289162
- Hallquist, M. N., & Wiley, J. F. (2018). MplusAutomation: An r package for facilitating large-scale latent variable analyses in Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling, 25, 621–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1402334
- Hayashi, K., Bentler, P. M., & Yuan, K.-H. (2007). On the likelihood ratio test for the number of factors in exploratory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 505–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301891
- Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2016). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282485
- Hopwood, C. J., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). How should the internal structure of personality inventories be evaluated? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 332–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310361240
- Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
- Hu, L. T., Bentler, P. M., & Kano, Y. (1992). Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted? Psychological Bulletin, 112, 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.351
- Jöreskog, K. G. (1967). Some contributions to maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 32, 443–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289658
- Joshanloo, M., Capone, V., Petrillo, G., & Caso, D. (2017). Discriminant validity of hedonic, social, and psychological well-being in two Italian samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 109, 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.12.036
- Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116
- Lai, K., & Green, S. B. (2016). The problem with having two watches: Assessment of fit when RMSEA and CFI disagree. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1134306
- MacCallum, R. C., Edwards, M. C., & Cai, L. (2012). Hopes and cautions in implementing Bayesian structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 17, 340–345. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027131
- MacCallum, R. C., & Tucker, L. R. (1991). Representing sources of error in the common-factor model: Implications for theory and practice. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 502–511. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.109.3.502
- Magnus, J. R., & Neudecker, H. (1999). Matrix differential calculus with applications in statistics and econometrics (revised). Wiley.
- Mai, Y., Zhang, Z., & Wen, Z. (2018). Comparing exploratory structural equation modeling and existing approaches for multiple regression with latent variables. Structural Equation Modeling, 25, 737–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1444993
- Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
- Marsh, H. W., Liem, G. A. D., Martin, A. J., Morin, A. J. S., & Nagengast, B. (2011). Methodological measurement fruitfulness of exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM): New approaches to key substantive issues in motivation and engagement. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 322–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911406657
- Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Morin, A. J. S., & Davier, M. V. (2013). Why item parcels are (almost) never appropriate: Two wrongs do not make a right–camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in CFA models. Psychological Methods, 18, 257–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032773
- Marsh, H. W., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A. J. S., & Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 439–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008220
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus (7.11) [Computer software]. Muthén & Muthén.
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 599–620. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_8
- Preacher, K. J., & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Repairing tom swift’s electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2, 13–43. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328031US0201_02
- Preacher, K. J., Zhang, G., Kim, C., & Mels, G. (2013). Choosing the optimal number of factors in exploratory factor analysis: A model selection perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48, 28–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.710386
- R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org
- Rao, C. R. (1997). Statistics and truth: Putting chance to work (2nd ed.). World Scientific.
- Sass, D. A., & Schmitt, T. A. (2010). A comparative investigation of rotation criteria within exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 73–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170903504810
- Schmitt, T. A., & Sass, D. A. (2010). Rotation criteria and hypothesis testing for exploratory factor analysis: Implications for factor pattern loadings and interfactor correlations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410387348
- Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16, 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353
- Tucker, L. R., Koopman, R. F., & Linn, R. L. (1969). Evaluation of factor analytic research procedures by means of simulated correlation matrices. Psychometrika, 34, 421–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02290601
- Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag.
- Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127
- Yang, Y., & Xia, Y. (2015). On the number of factors to retain in exploratory factor analysis for ordered categorical data. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 756–772. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0499-2
- Yuan, K.-H., & Chan, W. (2005). On nonequivalence of several procedures of structural equation modeling. Psychometrika, 70, 791–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-001-0930-9
- Yuan, K.-H., Chan, W., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Robust transformation with applications to structural equation modelling. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 53, 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711000159169
- Yuan, K.-H., Yang, M., & Jiang, G. (2017). Empirically corrected rescaled statistics for SEM with small N and large p. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 52, 673–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2017.1354759
- Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432