References
- Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. N. Petrovand & F. Caski (Eds.), Proceeding of the second international symposium on information theory (p. 267–281). Budapest, Hungary: Akademiai Kiado.
- Asparouhov, T., & Muthen, B. (2010). Simple second order chi-square correction (Mplus web note). https://www.statmodel.com/download/WLSMV_new_chi21.pdf
- Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
- Bentler, P. M. (2006). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Multivariate Software.
- Bentler, P. M., & Satorra, A. (2010). Testing model nesting and equivalence. Psychological Methods, 15, 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019625
- Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
- Cai, L., & Monroe, S. (2014). A new statistic for evaluating item response theory models for ordinal data (CRESST Report 839). University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
- Cudeck, R., & Browne, M. W. (1992). Constructing a covariance matrix that yields a specified minimizer and a specified minimum discrepancy function value. Psychometrika, 57, 357–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295424
- Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2005). Sensitivity of fit indices to misspecifed structural or measurement model components: Rationale of two-index strategy revisited. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1203_1
- Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2007). Sensitivity of fit indices to model misspecifcation and model type. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 509–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701382864
- Forero, C. G., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Gallardo-Pujol, D. (2009). Factor analysis with ordinal indicators: A monte carlo study comparing DWLS and ULS estimation. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903203573
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
- Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1988). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications (2nd ed.). International Education Services.
- Lai, K. (2019). Correct point estimator and confidence interval for RMSEA given categorical data. Structural Equation Modeling, 1–18. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1687302
- Lai, K. (2020). Confidence interval for RMSEA or CFI difference between nonnested models. Structural Equation Modeling, 27, 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1631704
- Lai, K., & Green, S. B. (2016). The problem with having two watches: Assessment of fit when RMSEA and CFI disagree. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1134306
- Lai, K., Green, S. B., & Levy, R. (2017). Graphical displays for understanding SEM model similarity. Structural Equation Modeling, 24, 803–818. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1334206
- Lee, S.-Y., & Poon, W.-Y. (1986). Maximum likelihood estimation of polyserial correlation. Psychometrika, 51, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294004
- Lee, S.-Y., Poon, W.-Y., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). A two-stage estimation of structural equation models with continuous and polytomous variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 48, 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1995tb01067.x
- Li, C.-H. (2016). The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 21, 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000093
- MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Cai, L. (2006). Testing differences between nested covariance structure models: Power analysis and null hypotheses. Psychological Methods, 11, 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.19
- MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
- MacCallum, R. C., Wegener, D. T., Uchino, B. N., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1993). The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.185
- Markland, D. (2005). The golden rule is that there are no golden rules: A commentary on Paul Barrett’s recommendations for reporting model fit in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 851–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.023
- Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Grayson, D. (2005). Goodness of fit evaluation in structural equation modeling. In A. MaydeuOlivares & J. McArdle (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics: A festschrift to Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 275–340). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
- Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Joe, H. (2006). Limited information goodness-offit testing in multidimensional contingency tables. Psychometrika, 71, 713–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-005-1295-9
- McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Priniples and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64
- Millsap, R. E. (2007). Structural equation modeling made difficult. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 875–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.021
- Millsap, R. E. (2013). A simulation paradigm for evaluating approximate fit. In M. Edwards & R. MacCallum (Eds.), Current topics in the theory and application of latent variable models (pp. 165–182). Routledge.
- Monroe, S., & Cai, L. (2015). Evaluating structural equation models for categorical outcomes: A new test statistic and a practical challenge of interpretation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 569–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1032398
- Moshagen, M., & Erdfelder, E. (2016). A new strategy for testing structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.950896
- Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2017). Mplus 8 user’s guide. Muthen and Muthen.
- Olsson, U. (1979). Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 44, 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296207
- R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/
- Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
- Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variable analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Sage.
- Savalei, V. (2018). On the computation of the RMSEA and CFI from the mean-and-variance corrected test statistic with nonnormal data in SEM. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53, 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1455142
- Savalei, V., & Rhemtulla, M. (2013). The performance of robust test statistics with categorical data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66, 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02049.x
- Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136
- Shapiro, A. (1983). Asymptotic distribution theory in the analysis of covariance structures (a unified approach). South African Statistical Journal, 17, 33–81.
- Steiger, J. H. (2016). Notes on the Steiger-Lind (1980) Handout. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 777–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1217487
- Xia, Y., & Yang, Y. (2019). RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 409–428. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2
- Yang-Wallentin, F., Joreskog, K. G., & Luo, H. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variaibles with misspecified models. Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 392–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2010.489003
- Yuan, K.-H. (2005). Fit indices versus test statistics. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 115–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4001_5
- Yuan, K.-H., Chan, W., Marcoulides, G. A., & Bentler, P. M. (2016). Assessing structural equation models by equivalence testing with adjusted fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2015.1065414