References
- American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
- Boomsma, A. (2000). Reporting analyses of covariance structures. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 461–483. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0703_6
- Brumback, B. A., Hernán, M. A., Haneuse, S. J. P. A., & Robins, J. M. (2004). Sensitivity analyses for unmeasured confounding assuming a marginal structural model for repeated measures. Statistics in Medicine, 23, 749–767. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1657
- Carpenter, C. J. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of health belief model variables in predicting behavior. Health Communication, 25, 661–669. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2010.521906
- Colorni, A., Dorigo, M., & Maniezzo, V. (1992). Distributed optimization by ant colonies. In F. Varela & P. Bourgine (Eds.), Proceedings of ECAL 91 - First European conference on artificial life(pp. 134–142). Elsevier.
- Cornfield, J., Haenszel, W., Hammond, E. C., Lilienfeld, A. M., Shimkin, M. B., & Wynder, E. L. (1959). Smoking and lung cancer: Recent evidence and a discussion of some questions. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 22, 173–203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/22.1.173
- Dorigo, M., & Stützle, T. (2004). Ant colony optimization. MIT Press.
- Dréo, J., Pétrowski, A., Siarry, P., & Taillard, E. (2006). Metaheuristics for hard optimization. Springer.
- Frank, K. A. (2000). Impact of a confounding variable on a regression coefficient. Sociological Methods & Research, 29, 147–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124100029002001
- Harring, J. R., McNeish, D. M., & Hancock, G. R. (2017, December). Using phantom variables in structural equation modeling to assess model sensitivity to external misspecification. Psychological Methods, 22, 616–631. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000103
- Haughton, D., Kamis, A., & Scholten, P. (2006). A review of three directed acyclic graphs software packages: MIM, Tetrad, and WinMine. American Statistician, 60, 272–286. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X117972
- Hayduk, L., Cummings, G., Boadu, K., Pazderka-Robinson, H., & Boulianne, S. (2007). Testing! Testing! One, two, three – Testing the theory in structural equation models! Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 841–850. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.001
- Kaplan, D. (1990). Evaluating and modifying covariance structure models: A review and recommendation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 137–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_1
- Kim, Y. S. G., & Schatschneider, C. (2017). Expanding the developmental models of writing: A direct and indirect effects model of developmental writing (DIEW). Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 35–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000129
- Kolenikov, S. (2011). Biases of parameter estimates in misspecified structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 41, 119–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01236.x
- Landsheer, J. A. (2010). The specification of causal models with Tetrad IV: A review. Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 703–711. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2010.510074
- Leite, W. L., Huang, I., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2008). Item selection for the development of short-forms of scales using an Ant Colony Optimization algorithm. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 43, 411–431. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170802285743
- Leite, W. L., & Shen, Z. (2020, July 18). SEMsens: A Tool for Sensitivity Analysis in Structural Equation Modeling. https://cran.r-project.org/package=SEMsens
- Leite, W. L., Stapleton, L. M., & Bettini, E. F. (2019). Propensity score analysis of complex survey data with structural equation modeling: A tutorial with Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling, 26, 448–469. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1522591
- Lyles, R. H., & Lin, J. (2010). Sensitivity analysis for misclassification in logistic regression via likelihood methods and predictive value weighting. Statistics in Medicine, 29, 2297–2309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3971
- Marcoulides, G. A., & Leite, W. L. (2012). Exploratory data mining algorithms for conducting searches in structural equation modeling: A comparison of some fit criteria. In J. McArdle & G. Ritschard (Eds.), Contemporary issues in exploratory data mining in the behavioral sciences (pp. 150–171). Taylor & Francis/Routledge.
- Marcoulides, K. M., & Falk, C. F. (2018). Model specification searches in structural equation modeling with R. Structural Equation Modeling, 25, 484–491. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1409074
- Marcoulides, K. M., & Yuan, K.-H. (2017). New ways to evaluate goodness of fit: A note on using equivalence testing to assess structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 24, 148–153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1225260
- Marsh, H. W., Hau, K., & Grayson, D. (2005). Goodness of fit in structural equation models. In A. Maydeu-Olivares & J. J. McArdle (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics: A festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 275–340). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64
- McLachlan, G. J., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. John Wiley and Sons.
- Pearl, J. (1998). Graphs, causality, and structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 27, 226–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124198027002004
- Pek, J., & MacCallum, R. C. (2011). Sensitivity analysis in structural equation models: Cases and their influence. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 202–228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.561068
- R Development Core Team. (n.d.). The comprehensive R archive network. https://cran.r-project.org/
- Raborn, A. W., & Leite, W. L. (2018). ShortForm: An R package to select scale short forms with the ant colony optimization algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 516–517. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621617752993
- Raborn, A. W., Leite, W. L., & Marcoulides, K. M. (2020). A comparison of metaheuristic optimization algorithms for scale short form development. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80, 910–931. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164420906600
- Ramsey, J. D., & Malinsky, D. (2017). Comparing the Performance of Graphical Structure Learning Algorithms with TETRAD. (Technical report). Carnegie Mellon University. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1607.08110v2.pdf
- Rezvan, P. H., White, I. R., Lee, K. J., Carlin, J. B., & Simpson, J. A. (2015). Evaluation of a weighting approach for performing sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 15, 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0074–2
- Rindskopf, D. (1984). Using phantom and imaginary latent variables to parameterize constraints in linear structural models. Psychometrika, 49, 37–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294204
- Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
- Sava, F. A. (2002). Causes and effects of teacher conflict-inducing attitudes towards pupils: A path analysis model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 1007–1021. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00056–2
- Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin Company.
- Socha, K., & Dorigo, M. (2008). Ant colony optimization for continuous domains. European Journal of Operational Research, 185, 1155–1173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.046
- Tofighi, D., Hsiao, Y. Y., Kruger, E. S., MacKinnon, D. P., Van Horn, M. L., & Witkiewitz, K. A. (2019). Sensitivity analysis of the no-omitted confounder assumption in latent growth curve mediation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 26, 94–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1506925
- Xu, S., & Blozis, S. A. (2010). Sensitivity analysis of mixed models for incomplete longitudinal data. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 36, 237–256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998610375836
- Yuan, K.-H., Kouros, C., & Kelley, K. (2008). Diagnosis for covariance structure models by analyzing the path. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 564–602. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510802338991
- Yuan, K.-H., Chan, W., Marcoulides, G. A., & Bentler, P. M. (2016). Assessing structural equation models by equivalence testing with adjusted fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 319–330. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2015.1065414