References
- Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294170
- Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 815–824. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018
- Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
- Bentler, P. M. (2007). On tests and indices for evaluating structural models. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 825–829. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.024
- Boomsma, A. (2013). Reporting Monte Carlo studies in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 518–540. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.797839
- Briggs, N. E., & Maccallum, R. C. (2003). Recovery of weak common factors by maximum likelihood and ordinary least squares estimation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 25–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3801_2
- Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.
- Browne, M. W., MacCallum, R. C., Kim, C.-T., Andersen, B. L., & Glaser, R. (2002). When fit indices and residuals are incompatible. Psychological Methods, 7, 403–421. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.7.4.403
- Cole, D. A., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Manifest variable path analysis: Potentially serious and misleading consequences due to uncorrected measurement error. Psychological Methods, 19, 300–315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033805
- Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2005). Sensitivity of fit indexes to misspecified structural or measurement model components: Rationale of two-index strategy revisited. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 343–367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1203_1
- Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2011). The reliability paradox in assessing structural relations within covariance structure models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 306–324. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410384856
- Heene, M., Hilbert, S., Draxler, C., Ziegler, M., & Bühner, M. (2011). Masking misfit in confirmatory factor analysis by increasing unique variances: A cautionary note on the usefulness of cutoff values of fit indices. Psychological Methods, 16, 319–336. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024917
- Herzog, W., Boomsma, A., & Reinecke, S. (2007). The model-size effect on traditional and modified tests of covariance structures. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 361–390. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301602
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
- Jackson, D. L. (2003). Revisiting sample size and number of parameter estimates: Some support for the n: Qhypothesis. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 128–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1001_6
- Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1988). LISREL 7. A guide to the program and applications (2nd ed.). International Education Services.
- Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 333–351. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1003_1
- Lai, K. (2019). A simple analytic confidence interval for CFI given nonnormal data. Structural Equation Modeling, 26, 757–777. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1562351
- Maiti, S. S., & Mukherjee, B. N. (1990). A note on distributional properties of the Jöreskog-Sörbom fit indices. Psychometrika, 55, 721–726. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294619
- Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391–410. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391
- Marsh, H. W., Hau, K., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
- Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2017). Assessing the size of model misfit in structural equation models. Psychometrika, 82, 533–558. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-016-9552-7
- McDonald, R. P., & Marsh, H. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 247–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.247
- McNeish, D., An, J., & Hancock, G. R. (2018). The thorny relation between measurement quality and fit index cutoffs in latent variable models. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 43–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1281286
- Miles, J., & Shevlin, M. (1998). Effects of sample size, model specification and factor loadings on the GFI in confirmatory factor analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 85–90. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00055-5
- Moshagen, M. (2012). The model size effect in SEM: Inflated goodness-of-fit statistics are due to the size of the covariance matrix. Structural Equation Modeling, 19, 86–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2012.634724
- Pornprasertmanit, S., Miller, P., & Schoemann, A. R. (2013). Package simsem: SIMulated structural equation modeling. Retrieved from http://simsem.org .
- R Development Core Team. (2019). R: A lenguage and enviornment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.r-project.org/index.html
- Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan : An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
- Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., & Van der Veld, W. M. (2009). Testing structural equation models or detection of misspecifications? Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 561–582. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903203433
- Savalei, V. (2012). The relationship between root mean square error of approximation and model misspecification in confirmatory factor analysis models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 910–932. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412452564
- Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, A., & Dillon, W. R. (2005). A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. Journal of Business Research, 58, 935–943. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.10.007
- Shi, D., DiStefano, C., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Lee, T. (2021). Evaluating SEM model fit with small degrees of freedom. Multivariate Behavioral Research. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2020.1868965
- Shi, D., Lee, T., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2019). Understanding the model size effect on SEM Fit indices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 310–334. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164418783530
- Shi, D., Lee, T., & Terry, R. A. (2015). Abstract: Revisiting the model size effect in structural equation modeling (SEM). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.989012
- Shi, D., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & DiStefano, C. (2018). the relationship between the standardized root mean square residual and model misspecification in factor analysis models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53, 676–694. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1476221
- Skrondal, A. (2000). Design and analysis of Monte Carlo experiments: Attacking the conventional wisdom. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 137–167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3502_1
- Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
- Steiger, J. H. (2000). Point estimation, hypothesis testing, and interval estimation using the RMSEA: Some comments and a reply to Hayduck and Glaser. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 149–162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0702_1
- Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 893–898. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017
- Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170
- Ximénez, C. (2006). A Monte Carlo study of recovery of weak factor loadings in confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 587–614. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1304_5
- Ximénez, C. (2009). Recovery of weak factor loadings in confirmatory factor analysis under conditions of model misspecification. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1038–1052. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1038