479
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

An Evaluation of Methods for Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling

&
Pages 703-715 | Received 02 Jul 2021, Accepted 24 Feb 2022, Published online: 07 Apr 2022

References

  • Becker, B. J. (1992). Using results from replicated studies to estimate linear models. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17, 341–362.
  • Becker, B. J., & Schram, C. M. (1994). Examining explanatory models through research synthesis. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 357–381). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Becker, B. J. (1995). Corrections to ‘using results from replicated studies to estimate linear models’. Journal of Educational Statistics, 20, 100–102.
  • Becker, B. J. (2000). Multivariate meta-analysis. Handbook of Applied Multivariate Statistics and Mathematical Modeling, 2, 399–416.
  • Burton, A., Altman, D., Royston, P., & Holder, R. L. (2006). The design of simulation studies in medical statistics. Statistics in Medicine, 25, 4279–4292.
  • Cheung, M. W. L. (2013). Multivariate meta-analysis as structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20, 429–454.
  • Cheung, M. W. L. (2014). Fixed- and random-effects meta-analytic structural equation modeling: Examples and analyses in R. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 29–40.
  • Cheung, M. W. L. (2019). Some reflections on combining meta-analysis and structural equation modeling. Research Synthesis Methods, 10, 15–22.
  • Cheung, M. W. L., & Chan, W. (2005). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: A two-stage approach. Psychological Methods, 10, 40–64.
  • Cheung, M. W.-L. (2015). Meta-analysis: A structural equation modeling approach.
  • Field, A. P. (2005). Is the meta-analysis of correlation coefficients accurate when population correlations vary? Psychological Methods, 10, 444–467.
  • Furlow, C. F., & Beretvas, S. N. (2005). Meta-analytic methods of pooling correlation matrices for structural equation modeling under different patterns of missing data. Psychological Methods, 10, 227–254.
  • Furlow, C. F., & Beretvas, S. N. (2010). An evaluation of multiple imputation for meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 9, 129–143.
  • Hafdahl, A. R. (2007). Combining correlation matrices: Simulation analysis of improved fixed-effects methods. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 32, 180–205.
  • Hedges, L. V., Tipton, E., & Johnson, M. C. (2010). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis Methods, 1, 39–65.
  • Hong, C., Riley, D. R., & Chen, Y. (2018). An improved method for bivariate meta-analysis when within-study correlations are unknown. Research Synthesis Methods, 9, 73–88.
  • Hoogland, J. J., & Boomsma, A. N. N. E. (1998). Robustness studies in covariance structure modeling an overview and a meta-analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 26, 329–367.
  • Huber, P. J. (1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In Proceedings of the fifth berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, June 21-July 18, 1965 and December 27, 1965-January 7, 1966 (vol. 1, 221–233). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Jak, S. (2015). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling. (pp. 1–88). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Jak, S., & Cheung, M. W. L. (2018). Accounting for missing correlation coefficients in fixed-effects MASEM. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53, 1–14.
  • Jak, S., Oort, F. J., Roorda, D. L., & Koomen, H. M. (2013). Meta-analytic structural equation modelling with missing correlations. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 67, 132–139.
  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34, 183–202.
  • Little, R., & Rubin, D. (1987). Statistical analyses with missing data. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Lv, J., & Maeda, Y. (2020). Evaluation of the efficacy of meta-analytic structural equation modeling with missing correlations. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27, 414–424.
  • Mazza, G. L., Enders, C. K., & Ruehlman, L. S. (2015). Addressing item-level missing data: A comparison of proration and full information maximum likelihood estimation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 504–519.
  • Mehta, P. D., & West, S. G. (2000). Putting the individual back into individual growth curves. Psychol Methods, 5, 23–43.
  • Moeyaert, M., Ugille, M., Natasha Beretvas, S., Ferron, J., Bunuan, R., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2017). Methods for dealing with multiple outcomes in meta-analysis: A comparison between averaging effect sizes, robust variance estimation and multilevel meta-analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20, 559–572.
  • Olkin, I., & Siotani, M. (1976). Asymptotic distribution of functions of a correlation matrix. In H. Ikeda (Ed.), Essays in probability and statistics (chapter 16, pp. 235–251). Tokyo: Shinko Tsusho.
  • Pigott, T. D. (2009). Handling missing data. The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis, 2, 399–416.
  • Pustejovsky, J. E., Tipton, E., & Aloe, A. (2018). Meta-analysis of dependent effect sizes: A review and consolidation of methods. Presentation at the American Educational Research Association.
  • Sheng, Z., Kong, W., Cortina, J. M., & Hou, S. (2016). Analyzing matrices of meta-analytic correlations: current practices and recommendations. Research Synthesis Methods, 7, 187–208.
  • Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Tipton, E. (2014). Robust variance estimation with dependent effect sizes: Practical considerations including a software tutorial in Stata and SPSS. Research Synthesis Methods, 5, 13–30.
  • Tanner-Smith, E. E., Tipton, E., & Polanin, J. R. (2016). Handling complex meta-analytic data structures using robust variance estimates: A tutorial in R. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 2, 85–112.
  • Tipton, E. (2015). Small sample adjustments for robust variance estimation with meta-regression. Psychological Methods, 20, 375–393.
  • Van den Noortgate, W., López-López, J. A., Marín-Martínez, F., & Sánchez-Meca, J. (2013). Three-level meta-analysis of dependent effect sizes. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 576–594.
  • Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1995). Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling. Personnel psychology, 48, 865–885.
  • Wilson, S. J., Polanin, J. R., & Lipsey, M. W. (2016). Fitting meta-analytic structural equation models with complex datasets. Research Synthesis Methods, 7, 121–139.
  • White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–830.
  • Yuan, K. H. (2016). Meta analytical structural equation modeling: Comments on issues with current methods and viable alternatives. Research Synthesis Methods, 7, 215–231.
  • Yuan, K. H., & Kano, Y. (2018). Meta-analytical SEM: Equivalence between maximum likelihood and generalized least squares. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 43, 693–720.
  • Zhang, Y. (2011). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM): Comparison of the multivariate methods (Doctoral dissertation)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.