Products of Variables in Structural Equation Models

References

• Bauer, D. J. (2005). A semiparametric approach to modeling nonlinear relations among latent variables. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12, 513–535. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1204_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, D. J., & Hussong, A. M. (2009). Psychometric approaches for developing commensurate measures across independent studies: Traditional and new models. Psychological Methods, 14, 101–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohrnstedt, G. W., & Goldberger, A. S. (1969). On the exact covariance of products of random variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64, 1439–1442. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1969.10501069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohrnstedt, G. W., & Marwell, G. (1978). The reliability of products of two random variables. Sociological Methodology, 9, 254–273. https://doi.org/10.2307/270812
   Google Scholar
• Boker, S. M., & McArdle, J. J. (2005). Path analysis and path diagrams. In B. Everitt & D. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science (Vol. 3, pp. 1529–1531). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Boker, S. M., McArdle, J. J., & Neale, M. C. (2002). An algorithm for the hierarchical organization of path diagrams and calculation of components of covariance between variables. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 174–194. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, L. A. (1960). On the exact variance of products. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 55, 708–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1960.10483369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (1984). Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.96.1.201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65, 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., & Hau, K.-T. (2004). Structural equation models of latent interactions: Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological Methods, 9, 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.3.275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., Hau, K.-T., Little, T. D., Bovaird, J. A., & Widaman, K. F. (2007). Unconstrained structural equation models of latent interactions: Contrasting residual-and mean-centered approaches. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 570–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701303921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArdle, J. J., & McDonald, R. P. (1984). Some algebraic properties of the reticular action model for moment structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1984.tb00802.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, P. D., & Neale, M. C. (2005). People are variables too: Multilevel structural equations modeling. Psychological Methods, 10, 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.3.259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moosbrugger, H., Schermelleh-Engel, K., & Klein, A. (1997). Methodological problems of estimating latent interaction effects. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 2, 95–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, M. C. (1998). Modeling interaction and nonlinear effects with mx: A general approach. In G. Marcoulides & R. Schumacker (Eds.), Interaction and non-linear effects in structural equation modeling (pp. 43–61). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, M. C., Hunter, M. D., Pritikin, J. N., Zahery, M., Brick, T. R., Kirkpatrick, R. M., Estabrook, R., Bates, T. C., Maes, H. H., & Boker, S. M. (2016). Openmx 2.0: Extended structural equation and statistical modeling. Psychometrika, 81, 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-014-9435-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oertzen, T. v., Brandmaier, A., & Tsang, S. (2015). Structural equation modeling with Ωnyx. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22, 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.935842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papoulis, A., & Pillai, S. U. (2002). Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacker, R. E. (2002). Latent variable interaction modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0901_3
   Google Scholar
• Schumaker, R. E., & Marcolides, G. A. (Eds.) (1998). Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, M. M., & Amemiya, Y. (2001). Generalized appended product indicator procedure for nonlinear structural equation analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986026001001
   Google Scholar
• Wall, M. M., & Amemiya, Y. (2003). A method of moments technique for fitting interaction effects in structural equation models. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 56, 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711003321645331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (1921). Correlation and causation. Journal of Agricultural Research, 20, 557–585.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (1934). The method of path coefficients. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 5, 161–215. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177732676
   Google Scholar