197
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Revisiting Savalei’s (2011) Research on Remediating Zero-Frequency Cells in Estimating Polychoric Correlations: A Data Distribution Perspective

Pages 81-96 | Received 17 Oct 2022, Accepted 29 May 2023, Published online: 14 Jul 2023

References

  • Bainter, S. A., & Forster, D. E. (2019). The impact of moderate priors for Bayesian estimation and testing of item factor analysis models when maximum likelihood is unsuitable. Structural Equation Modeling, 26, 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1505521
  • Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. (2005). EQS 6.1 for Windows. [software]. Multivariate Software.
  • Bonett, D. G., & Price, R. M. (2005). Inferential methods for the tetrachoric correlation coefficient. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 30, 213–225. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986030002213
  • Bonett, D. G., & Price, R. M. (2007). Statistical inference for generalized Yule coefficients in 2 × 2 contingency tables. Sociological Methods & Research, 35, 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124106292358
  • Brown, M. B., & Benedetti, J. K. (1977). On the mean and variance of the tetrachoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 42, 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293655
  • Burnett, J., Dyer, C. B., Booker, J. G., Flores, D. V., Green, C. E., & Diamond, P. M. (2014). Community-based risk assessment of elder mistreatment and self-neglect: Evidence of construct validity and measurement invariance across gender and ethnicity. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 5, 291–319. https://doi.org/10.1086/677654
  • Cain, M. K., Zhang, Z., & Yuan, K. H. (2017). Univariate and multivariate skewness and kurtosis for measuring nonnormality: Prevalence, influence and estimation. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 1716–1735. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0814-1
  • Disabato, D. J., Folk, J. B., Wilson, J., Barboza, S., Daylor, J., & Tangney, J. (2016). Psychometric validation of a simplified form of the PICTS for low-reading level populations. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 38, 456–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-015-9533-7
  • Disabato, D. J., Goodman, F. R., & Kashdan, T. B. (2019). Is grit relevant to well‐being and strengths? Evidence across the globe for separating perseverance of effort and consistency of interests. Journal of Personality, 87, 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12382
  • DiStefano, C., Liu, J., Jiang, N., & Shi, D. (2018). Examination of the weighted root mean square residual: Evidence for trustworthiness? Structural Equation Modeling, 25, 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1390394
  • DiStefano, C., Shi, D., & Morgan, G. B. (2021). Collapsing categories is often more advantageous than modeling sparse data: investigations in the CFA framework. Structural Equation Modeling, 28, 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1803073
  • Drasgow, F. (2005). Polychoric and polyserial correlations. In S. Kotz, C. B. Read, N. Balakrishnan, B. Vidakovic (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. (2nd ed., pp. 6243–6248) John Wiley.
  • Flora, D. B., LaBrish, C., & Chalmers, R. P. (2012). Old and new ideas for data screening and assumption testing for exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00055
  • Garrido, L. E., Abad, F. J., & Ponsoda, V. (2013). A new look at Horn’s parallel analysis with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 18, 454–474. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030005
  • Jenkins, L. N., Fredrick, S. S., & Nickerson, A. (2018). The assessment of bystander intervention in bullying: Examining measurement invariance across gender. Journal of School Psychology, 69, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.05.008
  • Lacko, D., Čeněk, J., Točík, J., Avsec, A., Đorđević, V., Genc, A., Haka, F., Šakotić-Kurbalija, J., Mohorić, T., Neziri, I., & Subotić, S. (2022). The necessity of testing measurement invariance in cross-cultural research: Potential bias in cross-cultural comparisons with individualism–collectivism self-report scales. Cross-Cultural Research, 56, 228–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/10693971211068971
  • Long, M. A., Berry, K. J., & Mielke, P. W. Jr, (2009). Tetrachoric correlation: A permutation alternative. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 429–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408324463
  • Lubbe, D. (2019). Parallel analysis with categorical variables: Impact of category probability proportions on dimensionality assessment accuracy. Psychological Methods, 24, 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000171
  • Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Böckenholt, U. (2005). Structural equation modeling of paired-comparison and ranking data. Psychological Methods, 10, 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.3.285
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus. (Version 8) [Computer software]. Muthén & Muthén.
  • Olsson, U. (1979). Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 44, 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296207
  • Olvera Astivia, O. L. (2013). On the estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient via Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods [Master dissertation, University of British Columbia]. UBC Theses and Dissertations. https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/24/items/1.0073832
  • Pearson, K. (1900). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution.–VII. On the correlation of characters not quantitatively measurable. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 195, 1–47.
  • Pearson, K., & Pearson, E. S. (1922). On polychoric coefficients of correlation. Biometrika, 14, 127–156. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331858
  • Pendergast, L. L., von der Embse, N., Kilgus, S. P., & Eklund, K. R. (2017). Measurement equivalence: A non-technical primer on categorical multi-group confirmatory factor analysis in school psychology. Journal of School Psychology, 60, 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2016.11.002
  • Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5
  • R Core Team (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (Version 4.2.1) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org.
  • Recio-Román, A., Recio-Menéndez, M., & Román-González, M. V. (2021). Global vaccine hesitancy segmentation: A cross-European approach. Vaccines, 9, 617. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060617
  • Revelle, W. (2022). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality Research. [Computer software] (Version 2.2.5). Northwestern University. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych.
  • Ritchie-Scott, A. (1918). The correlation coefficient of a polychoric table. Biometrika, 12, 93–133. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331931
  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  • Savalei, V. (2011). What to do about zero frequency cells when estimating polychoric correlations. Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.557339
  • Schuberth, F., Henseler, J., & Dijkstra, T. K. (2018). Partial least squares path modeling using ordinal categorical indicators. Quality & Quantity, 52, 9–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0401-7
  • Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16, 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353
  • Yang, Y., & Xia, Y. (2019). Categorical omega with small sample sizes via Bayesian estimation: An alternative to frequentist estimators. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164417752008
  • Yates, F. (1934). Contingency tables involving small numbers and the χ2 test. Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1, 217–235. https://doi.org/10.2307/2983604
  • Zhang, G., Jiang, G., Hattori, M., Trichtinger, L. (2022). EFAutilities: Utility functions for exploratory factor analysis. [Computer software] (Version, 2.1.2). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/EFAutilities/index.html.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.