A network of yarns, a network of networks: exploring the evolution of the urban knitting movement

References

• Animammersa (2019). Il Progetto. https://mettiamociunapezza.wordpress.com/il-progetto-2019/
   Google Scholar
• AoIR (2019). Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Auther, E. (2010). String, Felt, Thread: The Hierarchy of Art and Craft in American Art. Minnesota University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bain, J. (2016), ‘Darn Right I’m a Feminist… Sew What?’ The Politics of Contemporary Home Dressmaking: Sewing, Slow Fashion and Feminism. Women’s Studies International Forum, 56, 57–66.
   Google Scholar
• Baldini, A., & Pietrucci, P. (2017). Knitting a Community Back Together. Post-Disaster Public Art as Citizenship Engagement. In L. Iannelli & P. Musarò (Eds.), Performative Citizenship. Public Art, Urban Design, And Political Participation (pp. 115–131). Mimesis.
   Google Scholar
• Black, A., & Burisch, N. (2010). Craft hard, die free: Radical curatorial strategies for craftivism in unruly contexts. In G. Adamson (Ed.), The craft reader (pp. 609–619). Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Black, S. (2017). KNIT + RESIST: Placing the Pussyhat Project in the Context of Craft Activism. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(5),696–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchè, U. (2015). Street Art and Related Terms – Discussion and Working Definition. Street Art & Urban Creativity Scientific Journal, 1(2),32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R.E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Braitch, J.Z., & Brush H.M. (2011). Fabricating Activism: Craft-work, Popular Culture, Gender. Utopian Studies, 22(2),233–260.
   Google Scholar
• Brooker, P., Barnett, J., Cribbin, T., & Sharma, S. (2016). Have we even solved the first “big data challenge”? Practical issues concerning data collection and visual representation for social media analytics. In H. Snee, C. Hine, Y. Morey, S. Roberts, & H. Watson (Eds.), Digital methods for social science (pp. 34–50). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2016). Methodological innovation in precarious spaces: The case of Twitter. In H. Snee, C. Hine, Y. Morey, S. Roberts, & H. Watson (Eds.), Digital methods for social science (pp. 17–33). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Buser, M., Bonura, C., Fannin, M., & Boyer, K. (2013). Cultural Activism and The Politics of Place-Making. City, 17(5),606–627.
   Google Scholar
• Butchart, A. (2018). The Artificial Divide Between Fine Art and Textiles is a Gendered Issue. https://www.frieze.com/article/artificial-divide-between-fine-art-and-textiles-gendered-issue
   Google Scholar
• Caron, C., Raby, R., Mitchell, C., Théwissen-LeBlanc, S., & Prioletta, J. (2017). From concept to data: Sleuthing social change-oriented youth voices on YouTube. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(1),47–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chansky, R.A. (2010). A stitch in time: Third-wave feminist reclamation of needled imagery. The Journal of Popular Culture, 43(4),681–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenoweth, E. (2019). Women’s Participation and the Fate of Resistance Campaigns: A Report on the Women in Resistance (WiRe) Dataset. One Earth Future Foundation, Broomfield, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Chenoweth, E., & Stephan, M.J. (2011). Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Close, S. (2018). Knitting Activism, Knitting Gender, Knitting Race. International Journal of Communication, 12, 867–889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett, S. (2017). How to be a Craftivism: The Art of Gentle Protest. Unbound.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, S., & Housley, S. (2011). The Craftivist Collective Guide to Craftivism. Utopian Studies, 22(2),344–351.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S.R. (2017). Hackerspaces: Making the Maker Movement. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., & Mosca, L. (2005). Global-net for Global Movements? A Network of Networks for a Movement of Movements. Journal of Public Policy, 25(1),165–190.
   Google Scholar
• Delwiche, A. (2013). The new left and the computer underground. Recovering political antecedents of participatory culture. In A. Delwiche & J.J. Henderson (Eds.), The participatory culture handbook (pp. 10–21). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Echols, A. (1989). Daring to be bad: Radical feminism in America, 1967-1975. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farinosi, M., & Treré, E. (2010). Inside the’ People of the Wheelbarrows’: Participation Between Online and Offline Dimension in The Post-Quake Social Movement. The Journal of Community Informatics, 6(3).
   Google Scholar
• Farinosi, M., & Fortunati, L. (2013). A New Fashion: Dressing Up the Cities. Textile: The Journal of Cloth & Culture, 11(3),282–299.
   Google Scholar
• Farinosi, M., & Fortunati, L. (2018) Knitting Feminist Politics: Exploring a Yarn-Bombing Performance in a Postdisaster City. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 42(2),138–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, T. (2018). Craftivism: A Manifesto/Methodology. https://www.talfitzpatrick.com/craftivismmanifestomethodology.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (1998). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunati, L. (1995). Arcane of Reproduction: Housework, Prostitution, Labor and Capital. Autonomedia.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunati, L. (2015). Social Reproduction, But Not as We Know It. ViewPoint magazine, October 31, 2015. https://www.viewpointmag.com/2015/10/31/social-reproduction-but-not-as-we-know-it/
   Google Scholar
• Gago, V. (2017). Neoliberalism from below. Popular pragmatics & baroque economies. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galimberti, J. (2019). Art Against Housework. Hotpotatoes: Notes from The Radical Whirlwind, 17 May 2019. http://www.hotpotatoes.it/2019/05/17/art-against-housework/
   Google Scholar
• Gauntlett, D. (2018). Making is Connecting. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Gavin, F. (2007). Street Renegades: New Underground Art. LaurenceKing.
   Google Scholar
• Giglietto, F., Rossi, L., & Bennato, D. (2012). The open laboratory: Limits and possibilities of using Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube as a research data source. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30, 145–159.
   Google Scholar
• Golder, S. A., & Macy, M. W. (2014). Digital footprints: Opportunities and challenges for online social research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 129–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, B., & Horton, L. (2011). Turn-of-the-Century Quilts: Embodied Objects in a Web of Relationships. In M. Daly Goggin & B. Fowkes Tobin (Eds.), Women and the Material Culture of Needlework and Textiles, 1750–1950 (pp. 93–110). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, L. (1986). What’s New in Women’s History. In T. De Lauretis (Ed.), <i>Feminist Studies/Critical Studies. Language, Discourse, Society</i> (pp. 20–30). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Greer, B. (2007). “Craftivism”. Encyclopedia of Activism and Social Justice. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Greer, B. (2014). Craftivism: The Art of Craft and Activism. ArsenalPulp.
   Google Scholar
• Hackney, F. (2015). Quiet Activism and The New Amateur: The Power of Home and Hobby Crafts. Design and Culture, 5(2), 169–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haveri, M. (2013). Urban Knitting – the Soft Side of Street Art. https://wiki.aalto.fi/download/attachments/79989026/Minna%20Haveri.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Highfield, T., & Leaver, T. (2016). Instagrammatics and digital methods: Studying visual social media, from selfies and GIFs to memes and emoji. Communication Research and Practice, 2(1), 47–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal, N. (2019). A Stitch in Time: How Craftivists Found Their Radical Voice. The Guardian, 28 Jul 2019. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jul/28/craftivism-protest-women-march-donald-trump
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. (2009). Knit It Together. Patterns and Inspiration for Knitting Circles. Voyageur.
   Google Scholar
• Kahne, J., Middaugh, E., & Allen, D. (2015). Youth, New Media, and the Rise of Participatory Politics. In D. Allen & J. Light (Eds.), From Voice to Influence: Understanding Citizenship in the Digital Age (pp. 35–55). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. (2014). Knitting as a Feminist Project? Women’s Studies International Forum, 44, 133–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. (2014). Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data and Society, 1, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Krouse, M.B. (1994). The AIDS Memorial Quilt as Cultural Resistance for Gay Communities. Critical Sociology, 20(3), 65–80.
   Google Scholar
• Kuznetsov, S., & Paulos, E. (2010). Rise of the Expert Amateur: DIY Projects, Communities, and Cultures. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (pp. 295–304). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Literat, I., & Markus, S. (2019). ‘Crafting a way forward’: Online participation, craftivism and civic engagement in Ravelry’s Pussyhat project group. Information, Communication & Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, J. (2015). Towards a politics of whimsy: Yarn bombing the city. Area, 47(1), 65–72. doi:10.1111/area.12164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marres, N. (2012). Material participation: Technology, the environment and everyday publics. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• McCaughan, E. J. (2012). Art and social movements: Cultural politics in Mexico and Aztlán. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGovern, A. (2019). Craftivism and Yarn bombing. Critical criminological perspectives. London, United Kingdom: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M., & Prain, L. (2009). Yarn-bombing: The art of crochet and Knit Graffiti. Vancouver, BC: ArsenalPulp.
   Google Scholar
• Newmeyer, T. (2008). Knit one, stitch two, protest three! Examining the historical and contemporary politics of crafting. Leisure/Loisir, 32(2), 437–460. doi:10.1080/14927713.2008.9651417
   Google Scholar
• Nochlin, L. (1989). Why have there been no great women artists? In L. Nochlin (Ed.), Women, art and power and other essays (pp. 145–178). Routledge. (Originally published 1971).
   Google Scholar
• Obniski, M. (2008, June). The arts and crafts movement in America. Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. Retrieved from http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/acam/hd_acam.htm
   Google Scholar
• Orton-Johnson, K. (2014). DIY citizenship, critical making and community. In M. Ratto & M. Boler (Eds.), DIY citizenship. Critical making and social media (pp. 141–156). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Padovani, C. (2013). Activists’ communication in a post-disaster zone: Cross-media strategies for protest mobilization in L’Aquila, Italy. In B. Cammaerts, A. Mattoni, & P. McCurdy (Eds.), Mediation and protest movements (pp. 179–203). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, R. (1983). The subversive stitch: Embroidery and making of the feminine. London, United Kingdom: Women’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, R., & Pollock, G. (1981). Old mistresses: Women, art and ideology. New York, NY: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, R., & Pollock, G. (1987). Framing feminism: Art and the women’s movement 1970-1985. London, United Kingdom: Pandora.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, A.N. (2018). YouTube Generated Video Clips as Qualitative Research Data: One Researcher’s Reflections on the Process. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(10), 759–767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentney, B. (2008). Feminism, activism, and knitting: Are the fibre arts a viable mode for feminist political action? Thirdspace, 8(1). Retrieved from http://journals.sfu.ca/thirdspace/index.php/journal/article/view/pentney/210
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, K. E. (2003). Discourse and display: The modern eye, entrepreneurship, and the cultural transformation of the patchwork quilt. Sociological Perspectives, 46(4), 461–490. doi:10.1525/sop.2003.46.4.461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, L. (2015). Knitting and the city. Geography Compass, 9(2), 81–95. doi:10.1111/gec3.12181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratto, M., & Boler, M. (2014). DIY and Activism: New Modes of Civic Engagement and Participatory Politics. In M. Ratto & M. Boler (Eds.), DIY Citizenship: Critical Making and Social Media (pp. 23–28). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, T. V. (2005). The art of protest: Culture and activism from the civil rights movement to the streets of seattle. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reiter, D. (2014). The positivist study of gender and international relations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59(7), 1301–1326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, K. (2010). Rebellious doilies and subversive stitches: Writing a craftivist history. In M. E. Buszek (Ed.), Extra/ordinary: Craft and contemporary art (pp. 184–203). London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, R. (2000). The world split open: How the modern women’s movement changed America. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe-Finkbeiner, K. (2004). The F word, feminism in Jeopardy: Women, politics, and the future. Emeryville, CA: Seal Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, G.W., & Bernard, H.R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15, 85–109.
   Google Scholar
• Sennet, R. (2009). The craftsman. Harmondsworth, United Kingdom: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Sohan, V. K. (2014). ‘But a quilt is more’: Recontextualizing the discourse(S) of the Gee’s bend quilts. College English, 77(4), 294–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soep, E. (2014). Participatory Politics. Next-Generation Tactics to Remake Public Spheres. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Steed, J. (2016). Hand knitting in a digital era. In N. Nimkulrat, F. Kane, & K. Walton (Eds.), Crafting textiles in the digital age (pp. 139–151). Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Trussler, M. (2012, February 13). Half baked: The trouble with cupcake feminism. TheQuietus. Retrieved from https://thequietus.com/articles/07962-cupcake-feminism
   Google Scholar
• Wieviorka, M. (2005). After new social movements. Social Movement Studies, 4(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/14742830500051812
   Google Scholar
• Wills, K. (2007). The close-knit Circle. American knitters today. London, United Kingdom: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Zeisler, A. (2016). We were feminists once: From Riot Grrrl to CoverGirl®, the buying and selling of a political movement. Philadelphia, PA: PublicAffairs.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, E. (2014). New Media, New Civics? Policy & Internet, 6(2), 151–168.
   Google Scholar