496
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Digital populism in an authoritarian context: A discourse analysis of the legitimization of the Belt and Road Initiative by China’s party media

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • All China Journalist Association. (2017). Development of China’s News Media (2016). Beijing: Foreign Languages Press. http://www.xinhuanet.com/zgjx/136330786_14962868633441n.pdf
  • Arcodia, G. F., Basciano, B., & Melloni, C. (2014). Verbal reduplication in sinitic. Proceedings of the 8th Décembrettes, 22, 15–45.
  • Baldwin-Philippi, J. (2018). The technological performance of populism. New Media & Society, 21(2), 376–397. doi:10.1177/1461444818797591
  • Bartlett, J., Birdwell, J., & Littler, M. (2011). The new face of digital populism. London: Demos.
  • Block, E., & Negrine, R. (2017). The populist communication style: Toward a critical framework. International Journal of Communication, 11, 178–197.
  • Branson, T. S. (2011). Steeped in rhetoric: digital populism and the tea party movement [ Master’s thesis], University of Kansas. http://hdl.handle.net/1808/8041
  • Breeze, R. (2020). Exploring populist styles of political discourse in Twitter. World Englishes, 39(4), 550–567. doi:10.1111/weng.12496
  • Bulut, E., & Yörük, E. (2017). Mediatized populisms| digital populism: Trolls and political polarization of twitter in Turkey. International Journal of Communication, 11, 4093–4117.
  • Callahan, W. A. (2016). China’s “Asia Dream”: the belt road initiative and the new regional order. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 1(3), 226–243. doi:10.1177/2057891116647806
  • Callahan, W. A. (2017). Dreaming as a critical discourse of national belonging: China dream, American dream and world dream. Nations and Nationalism, 23(2), 248–270. doi:10.1111/nana.12296
  • Dellagnelo, E. H. L., Böhm, S., & Mendonça, P. M. E. D. (2014). Organizing resistance movements: Contribution of the political discourse theory. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 54(2), 141–153. doi:10.1590/s0034-759020140203
  • Dimova, G. (2018). The three Ps of populism: personification, popularity and provocation. Global-e, 11(31). https://globalejournal.org/global-e/june-2018/three-ps-populism-personification-popularity-and-provocation
  • Dodge, P. S. W. (Ed.). (2020). Communication convergence in contemporary China: international perspectives on politics, platforms, and participation. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
  • Duff, P. A. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Economy, E. (2018). The third revolution: Xi Jinping and the new Chinese state. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Eklundh, E. (2019). Our damned weakness: Tensions between reason and emotion in podemos. In P. Cossarini & F. Vallespín (Eds.), Populism and passions: democratic legitimacy after austerity. routledge advances in democratic theory (pp. 67–81). New York: Routledge.
  • Eklundh, E. (2022). Questioning European democracy? versions of representation in the 15m movement and podemos. Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research, 28(3), 335–349. doi:10.1080/13260219.2022.2170729
  • Ekström, M., Patrona, M., & Thornborrow, J. (2018). Right-wing populism and the dynamics of style: A discourse-analytic perspective on mediated political performances. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), 1–11. doi:10.1057/s41599-018-0132-6
  • Erlingsson, C., & Brysiewicz, P. (2017). A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 7(3), 93–99. doi:10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001
  • Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: the universities. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 133–168. doi:10.1177/0957926593004002002
  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. London: Longman.
  • Fang, K. (2022). The tabloidization of party media: how the people’s daily and CCTV adapt to social media. In S. I. Zhang (Ed.), Digital journalism in China (pp. 48–60). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003247579
  • Fang, K., & Repnikova, M. (2017). Demystifying “Little Pink”: the creation and evolution of a gendered label for nationalistic activists in China. New Media & Society, 20(6), 2162–2185. doi:10.1177/1461444817731923
  • Fister, S., & Brglez, M. (2021). People’s republic of China’s belt and road initiative: a critical discourse-theoretical analysis. Annales: Series Historia Et Sociologia, 31(1), 135–150.
  • Gilbert, C. J. (2020). Pissing in political cisterns, or laughing into the pot of “the flight 93 election. Communication & Critical/Cultural Studies, 17(1), 19–37. doi:10.1080/14791420.2020.1714067
  • Groshek, J., & Engelbert, J. (2013). Double differentiation in a cross-national comparison of populist political movements and online media uses in the United States and the Netherlands. New Media & Society, 15(2), 183–202. doi:10.1177/1461444812450685
  • Halliday, M. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English: part 2. Journal of Linguistics, 3(2), 199–244. doi:10.1017/S0022226700016613
  • Han, R. (2015a). Defending the authoritarian regime online: china’s “voluntary fifty-cent army. The China Quarterly, 224, 1006–1025. doi:10.1017/s0305741015001216
  • Han, R. (2015b). Manufacturing consent in cyberspace: china’s “fifty-cent army. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 44(2), 105–134. doi:10.1177/186810261504400205
  • Han, Z. (2013). The marketization of public discourse: The Chinese universities. Discourse & Communication, 8(1), 85–103. doi:10.1177/1750481313503221
  • Hartnett, S. J. (2011). Google and the “twisted cyber spy” affair: US–Chinese communication in an age of globalization. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 97(4), 411–434. doi:10.1080/00335630.2011.608705
  • Hornby, L. (2018, August 20). Mahathir Mohamad warns against ‘new colonialism’ during China visit. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/7566599e-a443-11e8-8ecf-a7ae1beff35b
  • Howarth, D., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2000). Introducing discourse theory and political analysis. In D. Howarth, A. Norval, & Y. Stavrakakis (Eds.), Discourse theory and political analysis: Identities, hegemonies, and social change (pp. 1–23). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Huang, H. (2018). The pathology of hard propaganda. The Journal of Politics, 80(3), 1034–1038. doi:10.1086/696863
  • Hyun, K. D., & Kim, J. (2015). The role of new media in sustaining the status quo: Online political expression, nationalism, and system support in China. Information, Communication & Society, 18(7), 766–781. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2014.994543
  • Iversen, L. L. (2014). Presenting the iterative curriculum discourse analysis (ICDA) approach. British Journal of Religious Education, 36(1), 53–71. doi:10.1080/01416200.2013.830959
  • Jiang, M. (2010). Authoritarian informationalism: China’s approach to internet sovereignty. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 30(2), 71–89. doi:10.1353/sais.2010.0006
  • Jiang, M. (2015). Chinese internet events. In A. Esarey & R. Kluver (Eds.), The internet in China: cultural, political, and social dimensions (1980–2000s) (pp. 211–218). MA: Berkshire.
  • Jiang, Y. (2012). Cyber-nationalism in China. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.
  • Jiang, M., & Esarey, A. (2018). Uncivil society in digital China: incivility, fragmentation, and political stability. International Journal of Communication, 12, 1928–1944.
  • King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2013). How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. The American Political Science Review, 107(2), 326–343. doi:10.1017/s0003055413000014
  • King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2017). How the Chinese government fabricates social media posts for strategic distraction, not engaged argument. The American Political Science Review, 111(3), 484–501. doi:10.1017/s0003055417000144
  • Kleinheksel, A. J., Rockich-Winston, N., Tawfik, H., & Wyatt, T. R. (2020). Qualitative research in pharmacy education: demystifying content analysis. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(1), 127–137. doi:10.5688/ajpe7113
  • Krämer, B. (2014). Media populism: a conceptual clarification and some theses on its effects. Communication Theory, 24(1), 42–60. doi:10.1111/comt.12029
  • Kreis, R. (2017). The “Tweet Politics” of president Trump. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(4), 607–618. doi:10.1075/jlp.17032.kre
  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kuo, S. H. (2007). Social change and discursive change: Analyzing conversationalization of media discourse in Taiwan. Discourse Studies, 9(6), 743–765. doi:10.1177/1461445607082577
  • Laclau, E. (1990). New reflections on the revolution of our time. London: Verso.
  • Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist reason. London: Verso.
  • Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
  • Liakopoulos, M. (2000). Argumentation analysis. In M. W. Bauer & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image, sound: a practical handbook (pp. 152–171). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Liu, S. (2006). China’s popular nationalism on the internet. Report on the 2005 anti-Japan network struggles 1. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 7(1), 144–155. doi:10.1080/14649370500463802
  • Liu, S. (2014, December 26). Renmin Ribao fali yidong hulianwang, ‘Xiakedao’ ‘Xuexixiaozu’ nixi (People’s Daily strengthens its presence on the mobile internet, with “Xiakedao” and “Xuexi xiaozu” striking back). Renminwang. http://media.people.com.cn/n/2014/1226/c40606-26278658.html
  • Liu, Z., & Zhang, P. (2020, January 15). Wangxinban xingui jinnian 3yue1ri qi shixing bachu wangluo shengtai ‘zacao’ (The Cyberspace Administration of China’s new rules will come into effect on March 1 this year to pull out the “weeds” of the online ecology). Renminwang. http://media.people.com.cn/n1/2020/0115/c40606-31548521.html
  • Lokot, T. (2017). Public networked discourses in the Ukraine-Russia conflict: ‘patriotic hackers’ and digital populism. Irish Studies in International Affairs, 28(1), 99–116. doi:10.3318/isia.2017.28.9
  • MacKinnon, R. (2011). Liberation technology: China’s “Networked Authoritarianism”. Journal of Democracy, 22(2), 32–46. doi:10.1353/jod.2011.0033
  • Malterud, K. (2012). Systematic text condensation: A strategy for qualitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 40(8), 795–805. doi:10.1177/1403494812465030
  • Mathieu, J. F., & Weinblum, S. (2013). The battle against unfair trade in the EU trade policy: A discourse analysis of trade protection. Perspectives on European Politics & Society, 14(2), 185–202. doi:10.1080/15705854.2013.785263
  • Mazzoleni, G. (2008). Populism and the media. In D. Albertazzi & D. McDonnell (Eds.), Twenty-first century populism: The spectre of Western European democracy (pp. 49–64). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: performance, political style, and representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Moffitt, B., & Tormey, S. (2014). Rethinking populism: politics, mediatisation and political style. Political Studies, 62(2), 381–397. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12032
  • Musloff, A., & Zinken, J. (2009). Metaphor and discourse. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • National Development and Reform Commission. (2015, September 21). Guojia fazhan gaigewei deng youguan bumen guifan ‘yidaiyilu’ changyi yingwen yifa. https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/fzggw/jgsj/kfs/sjdt/201509/t20150921_1085952.html
  • Nonhoff, M. (2019). Hegemony analysis: theory, methodology and research practice. In T. Marttila (Ed.), Discourse, Culture and Organization: Inquiries into Relational Structures of Power (pp. 63–104). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Oliver, J. E., & Rahn, W. M. (2016). Rise of the trumpenvolk: populism in the 2016 election. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 667(1), 189–206. doi:10.1177/0002716216662639
  • Paltridge, B. (2012). Discourse analysis: an introduction. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Rambelli, F. (2014). Floating signifiers: the plural significance of the grand shrine of ise and the incessant re-signification of shinto. Japan Review, 27, 221–242.
  • Renminwang. (2014, February 27). Xi Jingping zhuchi zhaokai zhongyang wangluo anquan he xinxihua lingdao xiaozu diyici huiyi, Li Keqiang Liu Yunshan chuxi (Xi Jinping presides over the first meeting of the central leading group on network security and informatization, attended by Li Keqiang and Liu Yunshan). http://politics.people.com.cn/n/2014/0227/c1001-24486430.html
  • Repnikova, M., & Fang, K. (2018). Authoritarian participatory persuasion 2.0: netizens as thought work collaborators in China. Journal of Contemporary China, 27(113), 763–779. doi:10.1080/10670564.2018.1458063
  • Ruta, M. (2018, May 4). Three opportunities and three risks of the belt and road initiative. World Bank Blogs. https://blogs.worldbank.org/trade/three-opportunities-and-three-risks-belt-and-road-initiative
  • Ryack, G. (2020, December 3). A hitch in the belt and road in Myanmar. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2020/12/a-hitch-in-the-belt-and-road-in-myanmar/
  • Samaranayake, N. (2021, March 2). Chinese belt and road investment isn’t all bad—or good. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/03/02/sri-lanka-china-bri-investment-debt-trap/
  • Schneider, F. (2016). China’s “info-web”: How Beijing governs online political communication about Japan. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2664–2684. doi:10.1177/1461444815600379
  • Stec, G. (2018, February). China’s belt and road initiative is neither a strategy nor a vision. it is a process. European Institute for Asian Studies. https://www.eias.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/EU_Asia_at_a_Glance_Stec_BRI_2018-1.pdf
  • Tang, H., Qi, L., & Zhang, X. (2020). The impact of algorithm on local journalism: a comparative study on report of Wuxi’s bridge collapse in 2019. Advances in Journalism and Communication, 8(3), 69–79. doi:10.4236/ajc.2020.83006
  • Tham, A., Fleischman, D., & Jenner, P. (2018). Spilling the Social capital beans: a comparative case study of coffee service enterprises within Asia-pacific. Asia Pacific Business Review, 24(2), 150–173. doi:10.1080/13602381.2018.1431255
  • Thomala, L. L. (2020, April 30). Number of Internet Users in China from December 2008 to March 2020. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/265140/number-of-internet-users-in-china/
  • Torfing, J. (1999). New theories of discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Zizek. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.
  • Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: new tools for critical discourse analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Von Groddeck, V., & Schwarz, J. O. (2013). Perceiving megatrends as empty signifiers: A discourse-theoretical interpretation of trend management. Futures, 47, 28–37. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2013.01.004
  • Wang, Z. (2008). National humiliation, history education, and the politics of memory: patriotic education campaign in China. International Studies Quarterly, 52(4), 783–806. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00526.x
  • Wiersma, L. D., & Fifer, A. M. (2008). “The schedule has been tough but we think it’s worth it”: the joys, challenges, and recommendations of youth sport parents. Journal of Leisure Research, 40(4), 505–530. doi:10.1080/00222216.2008.11950150
  • Wiles, P. (1969). A syndrome, not a doctrine: some elementary theses on populism. In G. Ionescu & E. Gellner (Eds.), Populism: Its meaning and national characteristics (pp. 166–179). London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
  • Wolf, M. (2022). Locating the laclausian left: Progressive strategy and the politics of anxiety. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Populism, 3, 139–161.
  • Wrześniewska-Pietrzak, M., & Kołodziejczak, M. (2018). Knocking down the system: Populism in Paweł Kukiz’s political discourse. Ethnolinguistic, 29, 245–264. doi:10.17951/et.2017.29.225
  • Yang, G. (2014). Internet activism & the party-state in China. Daedalus, 143(2), 110–123. doi:10.1162/daed_a_00276
  • Yang, G. (2019). Performing cyber-nationalism in twenty-first-century China: the case of diba expedition. In H. Liu (Ed.), From cyber-nationalism to fandom nationalism (pp. 1–12). New York: Routledge.
  • Yang, M. (2016). Understanding the one belt one road initiative: China’s perspective. In B. K. Sharma & N. D. Kundu (Eds.), China’s one belt one road: initiative, challenges and prospects (pp. 7–26). New Delhi: Vij Books India Private Limited.
  • Žižek, S. (1989). The sublime object of ideology. London: Verso.
  • Zou, S. (2019). When nationalism meets hip-hop: Aestheticized politics of ideotainment in China. Communication & Critical/Cultural Studies, 16(3), 178–195. doi:10.1080/14791420.2019.1637008

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.