The impact of aneuploidy on cellular homeostasis

References

• Potapova T, Gorbsky GJ. The consequences of chromosome segregation errors in mitosis and meiosis. Biology. 2017;6(1):12.
   Google Scholar
• Sheltzer JM, Torres EM, Dunham MJ, et al. Transcriptional consequences of aneuploidy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(31):12644–12649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach RR, Ricci-Tam C, Brennan CM, et al. Aneuploidy causes non-genetic individuality. Cell. 2017;169(2):229.e21–242.e21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres EM, Sokolsky T, Tucker CM, et al. Effects of aneuploidy on cellular physiology and cell division in haploid yeast. Science. 2007;317(5840):916–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Tsai HJ, Gordon MR, et al. Cellular stress associated with aneuploidy. Dev Cell. 2018;44(4):420–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonetti G, Bruno S, Padella A, et al. Aneuploidy: cancer strength or vulnerability? Int J Cancer. 2019;144(1):8–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schieber M, Chandel NS. ROS function in redox signaling and oxidative stress. Curr Biol. 2014;24(10):R453–R462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korenberg JR, Chen XN, Schipper R, et al. Down syndrome phenotypes: the consequences of chromosomal imbalance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91(11):4997–5001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres EM, Dephoure N, Panneerselvam A, et al. Identification of aneuploidy-tolerating mutations. Cell. 2010;143(1):71–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Rubinstein B, Li R. Whole chromosome aneuploidy: big mutations drive adaptation by phenotypic leap. BioEssays. 2012;34(10):893–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlistova L, Zemanova Z, Sarova I, et al. Change in ploidy status from hyperdiploid to near-tetraploid in multiple myeloma associated with bortezomib/lenalidomide resistance. Cancer Genet. 2014;207(7–8):326–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duesberg P, Stindl R, Hehlmann R. Explaining the high mutation rates of cancer cells to drug and multidrug resistance by chromosome reassortments that are catalyzed by aneuploidy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(26):14295–14300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams BR, Amon A. Aneuploidy: cancer’s fatal flaw? Cancer Res. 2009;69(13):5289–5291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang X, Zhang P. Aneuploidy and tumorigenesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2011;22(6):595–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moloney JN, Cotter TG. ROS signalling in the biology of cancer. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2018;80:50–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Fang X, Baker DJ, et al. The ATM-p53 pathway suppresses aneuploidy-induced tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(32):14188–14193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhoum SF, Silkworth WT, Nardi IK, et al. The mitotic origin of chromosomal instability. Curr Biol. 2014;24(4):R148–R149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhoum SF, Genovese G, Compton DA. Deviant kinetochore microtubule dynamics underlie chromosomal instability. Curr Biol. 2009;19(22):1937–1942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon DJ, Resio B, Pellman D. Causes and consequences of aneuploidy in cancer. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13(3):189–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu N, Shingaki K, Kaneko-Sasaguri Y, et al. When, where and how the bridge breaks: anaphase bridge breakage plays a crucial role in gene amplification and HSR generation. Exp Cell Res. 2005;302(2):233–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson SL, Compton DA. Examining the link between chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in human cells. J Cell Biol. 2008;180(4):665–672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansregret L, Swanton C. The role of aneuploidy in cancer evolution. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2017;7(1):1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payen VL, Zampieri LX, Porporato PE, et al. Pro- and antitumor effects of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2019 DOI:10.1007/s10555-019-09789-2
   Google Scholar
• Broome SC, Woodhead JST, Merry TL. Mitochondria-targeted antioxidants and skeletal muscle function. Antioxidants (Basel). 2018;7(8):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Reczek CR, Chandel NS. The two faces of reactive oxygen species in cancer. Annu Rev Cancer Biol. 2017;1(1):79–98.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad S, Gupta SC, Tyagi AK. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cancer: role of antioxidative nutraceuticals. Cancer Lett. 2017;387:95–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiswing L, St Clair WH, St Clair DK. Redox paradox: a novel approach to therapeutics-resistant cancer. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2018;29(13):1237–1272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limoli CL, Giedzinski E, Morgan WF, et al. Persistent oxidative stress in chromosomally unstable cells. Cancer Res. 2003;63(12):3107–3111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roh M, van der Meer R, Abdulkadir SA. Tumorigenic polyploid cells contain elevated ROS and ARE selectively targeted by antioxidant treatment. J Cell Physiol. 2012;227(2):801–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andriani GA, Almeida VP, Faggioli F, et al. Whole chromosome instability induces senescence and promotes SASP. Sci Rep. 2016;6:35218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pick E. Role of the Rho GTPase Rac in the activation of the phagocyte NADPH oxidase: outsourcing a key task. Small GTPases 2014;5:e27952.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davaadelger B, Shen H, Maki CG. Novel roles for P53 in the genesis and targeting of tetraploid cancer cells. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(11):e110844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes CM, Titus EA, Cooper AA. Degradation of misfolded proteins prevents ER-derived oxidative stress and cell death. Mol Cell. 2004;15(5):767–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan M, Shaukat Z, Saint R, et al. Chromosomal instability causes sensitivity to protein folding stress and ATP depletion. Biol Open. 2018;7(10).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumari S, Badana AK, G MM, et al. Reactive oxygen species: a key constituent in cancer survival. Biomark Insights. 2018;13:1177271918755391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojo T, Maishi N, Towfik AM, et al. ROS enhance angiogenic properties via regulation of NRF2 in tumor endothelial cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8(28):45484–45495.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ragu S, Faye G, Iraqui I, et al. Oxygen metabolism and reactive oxygen species cause chromosomal rearrangements and cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(23):9747–9752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dephoure N, Hwang S, O’Sullivan C, et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis reveals posttranslational responses to aneuploidy in yeast. eLife. 2014;3:e03023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemente-Ruiz M, Murillo-Maldonado JM, Benhra N, et al. Gene dosage imbalance contributes to chromosomal instability-induced tumorigenesis. Dev Cell. 2016;36(3):290–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen A, van der Burg M, Szuhai K, et al. Chromosome segregation errors as a cause of DNA damage and structural chromosome aberrations. Science. 2011;333(6051):1895–1898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degtyareva NP, Chen L, Mieczkowski P, et al. Chronic oxidative DNA damage due to DNA repair defects causes chromosomal instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28(17):5432–5445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres EM, Williams BR, Amon A. Aneuploidy: cells losing their balance. Genetics. 2008;179(2):737–746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz W, Weinstein B, Solomon F. Regulation of tubulin levels and microtubule assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: consequences of altered tubulin gene copy number. Mol Cell Biol. 1990;10(10):5286–5294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsea SH, Girirajan S. Smith-Magenis syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. 2008;16(4):412–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsley DL, Sandler L, Baker BS, et al. Segmental aneuploidy and the genetic gross structure of the Drosophila genome. Genetics. 1972;71(1):157–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masuda A, Takahashi T. Chromosome instability in human lung cancers: possible underlying mechanisms and potential consequences in the pathogenesis. Oncogene. 2002;21(45):6884–6897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulda S, Galluzzi L, Kroemer G. Targeting mitochondria for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9(6):447–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oromendia AB, Dodgson SE, Amon A. Aneuploidy causes proteotoxic stress in yeast. Genes Dev. 2012;26(24):2696–2708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong HWS, Shaukat Z, Wang J, et al. JNK signaling is needed to tolerate chromosomal instability. Cell Cycle. 2014;13(4):622–631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D, Shaukat Z, Xu T, et al. Autophagy regulates the survival of cells with chromosomal instability. Oncotarget. 2016;7(39):63913–63923.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dodgson SE, Kim S, Costanzo M, et al. Chromosome-specific and global effects of aneuploidy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2016;202(4):1395–1409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaukat Z, Liu D, Choo A, et al. Chromosomal instability causes sensitivity to metabolic stress. Oncogene. 2015;34(31):4044–4055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brault V, Duchon A, Romestaing C, et al. Opposite phenotypes of muscle strength and locomotor function in mouse models of partial trisomy and monosomy 21 for the proximal Hspa13-App region. PLOS Genet. 2015;11(3):e1005062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinton P, Giorgi C, Siviero R, et al. Calcium and apoptosis: ER-mitochondria Ca2+ transfer in the control of apoptosis. Oncogene. 2008;27(50):6407–6418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaupere C, Dinatto L, Wasko BM, et al. Genetic screen identifies adaptive aneuploidy as a key mediator of ER stress resistance in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(38):9586–9591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Wang Y, Zhou Y, et al. Jolkinolide B induces apoptosis of colorectal carcinoma through ROS-ER stress-Ca2+-mitochondria dependent pathway. Oncotarget. 2017;8(53):91223–91237.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brand MD. The sites and topology of mitochondrial superoxide production. Exp Gerontol. 2010;45(7–8):466–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly N, Passerini V, Dürrbaum M, et al. HSF1 deficiency and impaired HSP90-dependent protein folding are hallmarks of aneuploid human cells. EMBO J. 2014;33(20):2374–2387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau SJ, Amon A. Chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in cancer: from yeast to man. EMBO Rep. 2012;13(6):515–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockenbery DM. Targeting mitochondria for cancer therapy. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2010;51(5):476–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egnatchik RA, Leamy AK, Jacobson DA, et al. ER calcium release promotes mitochondrial dysfunction and hepatic cell lipotoxicity in response to palmitate overload. Mol Metab. 2014;3(5):544–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumari G, Ulrich T, Krause M, et al. Induction of p21Cip1 protein and cell cycle arrest after inhibition of aurora B kinase is attributed to aneuploidy and reactive oxygen species. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(23):16072–16084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murata M, Kong X, Moncada E, et al. NAD consumption by PARP1 in response to DNA damage triggers metabolic shift critical for damaged cell survival. bioRxiv 2018; 375212.
   Google Scholar
• Santaguida S, Vasile E, White E, et al. Aneuploidy-induced cellular stresses limit autophagic degradation. Genes Dev. 2015;29(19):2010–2021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariyoshi K, Miura T, Kasai K, et al. Induction of genomic instability and activation of autophagy in artificial human aneuploid cells. Mutat Res. 2016;790:19–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settembre C, Di Malta C, Polito VA, et al. TFEB links autophagy to lysosomal biogenesis. Science. 2011;332(6036):1429–1433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Angiolella V, Santarpia C, Grieco D. Oxidative stress overrides the spindle checkpoint. Cell Cycle. 2007;6(5):576–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikawa-Yoshida A, Ando K, Oki E, et al. Contribution of BubR1 to oxidative stress-induced aneuploidy in p53-deficient cells. Cancer Med. 2013;2(4):447–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollineni RC, Hoffmann R, Fedorova M. Proteome-wide profiling of carbonylated proteins and carbonylation sites in HeLa cells under mild oxidative stress conditions. Free Radic Biol Med. 2014;68:186–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang GF, Dong Q, Bai Y, et al. Oxidative stress induces mitotic arrest by inhibiting Aurora A-involved mitotic spindle formation. Free Radic Biol Med. 2017;103:177–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenson B, Crispino JD. The Aurora kinases in cell cycle and leukemia. Oncogene. 2015;34(5):537–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho MG, Ahn JH, Choi HS, et al. DNA double-strand breaks and Aurora B mislocalization induced by exposure of early mitotic cells to H2O2 appear to increase chromatin bridges and resultant cytokinesis failure. Free Radic Biol Med. 2017;108:129–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mailankot M, Smith D, Howell S, et al. Cell cycle arrest by kynurenine in lens epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(12):5466–5475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo J, Kim HS, Asmis R, et al. Interactions of β tubulin isotypes with glutathione in differentiated neuroblastoma cells subject to oxidative stress. Cytoskeleton. 2018;75(7):283–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Seefeldt T, Young A, et al. Microtubule S-glutathionylation as a potential approach for antimitotic agents. BMC Cancer. 2012;12(1):245.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu Q, Huff LP, Fujii M, et al. Redox regulation of the actin cytoskeleton and its role in the vascular system. Free Radic Biol Med. 2017;109:84–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohshima S. Centrosome aberrations associated with cellular senescence and p53 localization at supernumerary centrosomes. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2012;2012:217594.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brinkley BR. Managing the centrosome numbers game: from chaos to stability in cancer cell division. Trends Cell Biol. 2001;11(1):18–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusino S, Fernández-Padín FM, Saavedra HI. Centrosome aberrations and chromosome instability contribute to tumorigenesis and intra-tumor heterogeneity. J Cancer Metastasis Treat. 2018;4:43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duensing S, Münger K. Centrosome abnormalities, genomic instability and carcinogenic progression. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001;1471(2):M81–M88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellanos E, Dominguez P, Gonzalez C. Centrosome dysfunction in Drosophila neural stem cells causes tumors that are not due to genome instability. Curr Biol. 2008;18(16):1209–1214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussman JG, Horn HF, Carroll PE, et al. Synergistic induction of centrosome hyperamplification by loss of p53 and cyclin E overexpression. Oncogene. 2000;19(13):1635–1646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng X, Shaikh FY, Harrison MK, et al. The Ras oncogene signals centrosome amplification in mammary epithelial cells through cyclin D1/Cdk4 and Nek2. Oncogene. 2010;29(36):5103–5112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard MK, Hill NT, Bubulya PA, et al. The PTEN-Akt pathway impacts the integrity and composition of mitotic centrosomes. Cell Cycle. 2013;12(9):1406–1415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chae S, Yun C, Um H, et al. Centrosome amplification and multinuclear phenotypes are induced by hydrogen peroxide. Exp Mol Med. 2005;37(5):482–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward A, Hudson JW. p53-Dependent and cell specific epigenetic regulation of the polo-like kinases under oxidative stress. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e87918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang P, Lu YC, Wang J, et al. Type 2 diabetes promotes cell centrosome amplification via AKT-ROS-dependent signalling of ROCK1 and 14–3-3σ. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;47(1):356–367.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnandis T, Monteiro P, Adams SD, et al. Oxidative stress in cells with extra centrosomes drives non-cell-autonomous invasion. Dev Cell. 2018;47(4):409–424.e9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glorieux C, Calderon PB. Catalase down-regulation in cancer cells exposed to arsenic trioxide is involved in their increased sensitivity to a pro-oxidant treatment. Cancer Cell Int. 2018;18(1):24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ralph SJ, Nozuhur S, Moreno-Sanchez R, et al. NSAID celecoxib: a potent mitochondrial pro-oxidant cytotoxic agent sensitizing metastatic cancers and cancer stem cells to chemotherapy. JCMT. 2018;4(9):49
   Google Scholar
• Rodic S, Vincent MD. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are a key determinant of cancer’s metabolic phenotype. Int J Cancer. 2018;142(3):440–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang K, Jiang J, Lei Y, et al. Targeting metabolic–redox circuits for cancer therapy. Trends Biochem Sci. 2019;44(5):401–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar