Stabilized tetraether lipids based particles guided prophyrins photodynamic therapy

References

• Benvegnu T, Lemiègre L, Cammas-Marion S. (2008). Archaeal lipids: innovative materials for biotechnological applications. Eur J Org Chem 2008:4715–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benvegnu T, Rethore G, Brard M, et al. (2005). Archaeosomes based on novel synthetic tetraether-type lipids for the development of oral delivery systems. Chem Commun 5536–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien YW. 1988. In: Baker RW (ed.) Controlled release of biologically active agents. Wiley-Blackwell, 371–71.
   Google Scholar
• Chong PL-G. 2008. Physical properties of membranes composed of tetraether archaeal lipids. In: Robb F, Antranikian G, Grogan D, & Driessen A (eds.) Thermophiles biology and technology at high temperatures. 1st ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, 73–95.
   Google Scholar
• Chong PL-G, Ayesa U, Prakash Daswani V, Hur EC. (2012). On physical properties of tetraether lipid membranes: effects of cyclopentane rings. Archaea 2012:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derycke ASL, De Witte PAM. (2004). Liposomes for photodynamic therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 56:17–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolmans DE, Fukumura D, Jain RK. (2003). Photodynamic therapy for cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 3:380–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudek AZ, Pawlak WZ, Kirstein MN. (2003). Molecular targets in the inhibition of angiogenesis. Expert Opin Ther Targets 7:527–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelhardt KH, Pinnapireddy SR, Baghdan E, et al. (2017). Transfection studies with colloidal systems containing highly purified bipolar tetraether lipids from sulfolobus acidocaldarius. Archaea 2017:12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freisleben H-J. 2000. Tetraether Lipid Liposomes. In: Zimmer G (ed.) Membran Structure in Disease and Drug Therapy. New York (NY): Marcel Dekker, 127–152.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert DJ. 2011. How I perform ALA photodynamic therapy in my practice. In: Gold MH, ed. Photodynamic therapy in dermatology. New York: Springer Publishing, 161–172.
   Google Scholar
• Gohel MC, Sarvaiya KG, Shah AR, Brahmbhatt BK. (2009). Mathematical approach for the assessment of similarity factor using a new scheme for calculating weight. Indian J Pharm Sci 71:142–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfried V, Davidi R, Averbuj C, Kimel S. (1995). In vivo damage to chorioallantoic membrane blood vessels by porphycene-induced photodynamic therapy. J Photochem Photobiol B 30:115–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo X, Qu J, Zhu C, et al. (2018). Synchronous delivery of oxygen and photosensitizer for alleviation of hypoxia tumor microenvironment and dramatically enhanced photodynamic therapy. Drug Delivery 25:585–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer-Wilson MJ, Akian L, Espinoza J, et al. (1999). Photodynamic parameters in the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) bioassay for topically applied photosensitizers. J Photochem. Photobiol B 53:44–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huynh E, Zheng G. (2014). Porphysome nanotechnology: a paradigm shift in lipid-based supramolecular structures. Nano Today 9:212–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jheon S, Kim T, Kim J-K. (2011). Photodynamic therapy as an adjunct to surgery or other treatments for squamous cell lung cancers. Laser Ther 20:107–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johansson A, Andersson-Engels S. 2010. Photodynamic therapy-the quest for improved dosimetry in the management of solid tumors. In: Pavone FS (ed.) Laser imaging and manipulation in cell biology. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 167–202.
   Google Scholar
• Kachatkou D, Sasnouski S, Zorin V, et al. (2009). Unusual photoinduced response of mthpc liposomal formulation (Foslip). Photochem. Photobiol 85:719–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khaing Oo MK, Yang Y, Hu Y, et al. (2012). Gold nanoparticle-enhanced and size-dependent generation of reactive oxygen species from protoporphyrin IX. ACS Nano 6:1939–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochevar IE, Anderson RR. 1983. Experimental techniques in photoimmunology. In: Parrish JA, Kripke ML & Morison WL (eds.) Photoimmunology. New York (NY).: Plenum Publishing Corporation, 51–60.
   Google Scholar
• Lelkes PI, Goldenberg D, Gliozzi A, et al. (1983). Vesicles from mixtures of bipolar archaebacterial lipids with egg phosphatidylcholine. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembranes 732:714–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li F, Na K. (2011). Self-assembled chlorin e6 conjugated chondroitin sulfate nanodrug for photodynamic therapy. Biomacromolecules 12:1724–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L.B, Luo R.C. (2009). Effect of drug-light interval on the mode of action of Photofrin photodynamic therapy in a mouse tumor model. Lasers Med Sci 24:597–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim SH, Thivierge C, Nowak-Sliwinska P, et al. (2010). In vitro and in vivo photocytotoxicity of boron dipyrromethene derivatives for photodynamic therapy. J Med Chem 53:2865–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucky SS, Soo KC, Zhang Y. (2015). Nanoparticles in photodynamic therapy. Chem Rev 115:1990–2042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud G, Jedelska J, Strehlow B, Bakowsky U. (2015). Bipolar tetraether lipids derived from thermoacidophilic archaeon Sulfolobus acidocaldarius for membrane stabilization of chlorin e6 based liposomes for photodynamic therapy. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 95:88–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud G, Jedelska J, Strehlow B, et al. (2017). Photo-responsive tetraether lipids based vesicles for prophyrin mediated vascular targeting and direct phototherapy. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 159:720–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makanya AN, Dimova I, Koller T, et al. (2016). Dynamics of the developing chick chorioallantoic membrane assessed by stereology, allometry, immunohistochemistry and molecular analysis. PLoS One 11:e0152821–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens TF, Remaut K, Demeester J, et al. (2014). Intracellular delivery of nanomaterials: How to catch endosomal escape in the act. Nano Today 9:344–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta K, Sadeghi T, Mcqueen T, Lopez-Berestein G. (1994). Liposome encapsulation circumvents the hepatic clearance mechanisms of all-trans-retinoic acid. Leuk Res 18:587–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore JW, Flanner HH. (1996). Mathematical comparison of dissolution profiles. Pharm Tech 20:64–74.
   Google Scholar
• Mosmann T. (1983). Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 65:55–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcetin A, Dayyoub E, Hobler C, et al. (2011). Selective interactions of concanavalin A-modified tetraether lipid liposomes. Phys Status Solidi C 8:1985–9.
   Google Scholar
• Pegaz B, Debefve E, Ballini JP, et al. (2006). Photothrombic activity of m-THPC-loaded liposomal formulations: Pre-clinical assessment on chick chorioallantoic membrane model. Eur J Pharm Sci 28:134–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reshetov V, Kachatkou D, Shmigol T, et al. (2011). Redistribution of meta-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (m-THPC) from conventional and PEGylated liposomes to biological substrates. Photochem Photobiol Sci 10:911–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritger PL, Peppas NA. (1987). A simple equation for description of solute release I. Fickian and non-fickian release from non-swellable devices in the form of slabs, spheres, cylinders or discs. J Control Release 5:23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Rwei AY, Wang W, Kohane DS. (2015). Photoresponsive nanoparticles for drug delivery. Nano Today 10:451–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scolaro LM, Castriciano M, Romeo A, et al. (2002). Aggregation behavior of protoporphyrin IX in aqueous solutions: clear evidence of vesicle formation. J Phys Chem B 106:2453–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw AK, Pal SK. (2008). Spectroscopic studies on the effect of temperature on pH-induced folded states of human serum albumin. J Photochem Photobiol B 90:69–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Q, Tao Z, Yang H, et al. (2017). PDGFRB-specific affibody-directed delivery of a photosensitizer, IR700, is efficient for vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy of colorectal cancer. Drug Delivery 24:1818–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soenen SJ, Rivera-Gil P, Montenegro JM, et al. (2011). Cellular toxicity of inorganic nanoparticles: common aspects and guidelines for improved nanotoxicity evaluation. Nano Today 6:446–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toledano H, Edrei R, Kimel S. (1998). Photodynamic damage by liposome-bound porphycenes: comparison between in vitro and in vivo models. J Photochem Photobiol B 42:20–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas A, Pegaz B, Debefve E, et al. (2004). Improved photodynamic activity of porphyrin loaded into nanoparticles: an in vivo evaluation using chick embryos. Int J Pharm 286:131–45.
   Google Scholar
• Vemuri S, Rhodes CT. (1995). Preparation and characterization of liposomes as therapeutic delivery systems: a review. Pharm Acta Helv 70:95–111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang X, Li Z, Yang Y, et al. (2015). Photomechanically controlled encapsulation and release from ph-responsive and photoresponsive microcapsules. Langmuir 31:5456–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Lv BE, Cai G, et al. (2012). A proton shelter inspired by the sugar coating of acidophilic archaea. Sci Rep 2:5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BC, Patterson MS. (2008). The physics, biophysics and technology of photodynamic therapy. Phys Med Biol 53:R61–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhen Z, Tang W, Guo C, et al. (2013). Ferritin nanocages to encapsulate and deliver photosensitizers for efficient photodynamic therapy against cancer. ACS Nano 7:6988–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar