1,604
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Phenomenology of Between: An Intersubjective Epistemology for Psychological Science

&
Pages 1-28 | Received 01 Aug 2018, Accepted 19 Nov 2018, Published online: 27 Dec 2019

References

  • Anderson, A. K. (2015). Toward an objective neural measurement of subjective feeling states. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, 30–33. doi:10.1037/cns0000048
  • Basseches, M., & Brandao, A. (in press). Equilibration, development and truth. In M. F. Mascolo, & T. Bidell (Eds.), Handbook of integrative psychological development. New York, NY: Routlege.
  • Ben-Ze’ev, A. (2000). The subtlety of emotions. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Bennett, M. R., & Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Bonner, E. T., & Friedman, H. L. (2011). A conceptual clarification of the experience of awe: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. The Humanistic Psychologist, 39(3), 222–235. doi:10.1080/08873267.2011.593372
  • Burkitt, I. (1998). Bodies of knowledge: Beyond Cartesian views of persons, selves and mind. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 28(1), 63. doi:10.1111/1468-5914.00063
  • Burkitt, I. (2002). Complex emotions: Relations, feelings and images in emotional experience. Sociological Review Monograph, 50(2_suppl), 151–167. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2002.tb03596.x
  • Burkitt, I. (2012). Emotional reflexivity: Feeling, emotion and imagination in reflexive dialogues. Sociology, 46(3), 458–472. doi:10.1177/0038038511422587
  • Cordaro, D. T., Sun, R., Keltner, D., Kamble, S., Huddar, N., & McNeil, G. (2018). Universals and cultural variations in 22 emotional expressions across five cultures. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 18(1), 75–83. doi:10.1037/emo0000302
  • Cortina, M., & Liotti, G. (2010). The intersubjective and cooperative origins of consciousness: An evolutionary-developmental approach. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis & Dynamic Psychiatry, 38, 291–314. doi:10.1521/jaap.2010.38.2.291
  • Chiari, G., & Nuzzo, M. L. (2004). Steering personal construct theory toward hermeneutic constructivism. In J. D. Raskin, & S. K. Bridges (Eds.), Studies in meaning 2: Bridging the personal and social in constructivist psychology (pp. 51–65). New York, NY: Pace University Press.
  • Danziger, K. (1980). The history of introspection reconsidered. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16(3), 241–262. doi:10.1002/1520-6696(198007)16:3<241::AID-JHBS2300160306>3.0.CO;2-O
  • Davidson, D. (1986). A coherence theory of truth and knowledge. In E. LePore (Ed.), Truth and interpretation, Perspectives on the philosophy of Donald Davidson (pp. 307–319). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Davidson, D. (1996). Subjective, intersubjective, objective. Current issues in idealism. Bristol: Thoemmes.
  • De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2008). Making sense in participation: An enactive approach to social cognition. In F. Morganti, A. Carassa, G. Riva, F. Morganti, A. Carassa, & G. Riva (Eds.), Enacting intersubjectivity: A cognitive and social perspective on the study of interactions (pp. 33–47). Amsterdam, Netherlands. IOS Press.
  • di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events, a neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91(1), 176–180. doi:10.1007/BF00230027
  • de Quincey, C. (2000). Intersubjectivity: Exploring consciousness from the second-person perspective. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 32(2), 135–155.
  • de Rivera, J. (2006). Conceptual encounter: The experience of anger. In C. T. Fischer (Eds.), Qualitative research methods for psychologist: Introduction through empirical studies (pp. 213–245). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
  • Duranti, A. (2010). Husserl, intersubjectivity and anthropology. Anthropological Theory, 10(1-2), 16–35. doi:10.1177/1463499610370517
  • Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset. New York, NY. Basic Books.
  • Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (2005). Discursive psychology, mental states and descriptions. InH. te Molder, & J. Potter (Eds.), Conversation and cognition (pp. 241–259). New York, NY. Cambridge University:. In(pp. -). :
  • Ekman, P. (1993). Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist, 48(4), 384–392.
  • Feest, U. (2014). Phenomenal Experiences, First-Person Methods, and the Artificiality of Experimental Data. Philosophy of Science, 81(5), 927–939. doi:10.1086/677689.
  • Feinberg, M., M., Willer, R., & Keltner, D. (2012). Flustered and faithful: Embarrassment as a signal of prosociality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 81–97. doi:10.1037/a0025403
  • Fernyhough, C. (2006). Metaphors of mind. ThePsychologist, 19(6), 356–358.
  • Finlay, L. (2016). Probing between: Reflexive-relational approaches to human science research. In C. T. Fischer, L. Laubscher, & R. Brooke (Eds.), The qualitative vision for psychology: An invitation to a human science approach (pp. 71–90). Pittsburgh, PA. Duquesne University Press.
  • Gendron, M., Roberson, D., van der Vyver, J. M., & Barrett, L. F. (2014). Perceptions of emotion from facial expressions are not culturally universal: Evidence from a remote culture. Emotion, 14(2), 251–262. doi:10.1037/a0036052
  • Greiffenhagen, C., & Sharrock, W. (2008). Where do the limits of experience lie? Abandoning the dualism of objectivity and subjectivity. History of the Human Sciences, 21(3), 70–93. doi:10.1177/0952695108093954
  • Gunnery, S. D., & Ruben, M. A. (2016). Perceptions of Duchenne and non-Duchenne smiles: A meta-analysis. Cognition &Amp; Emotion, 30(3), 501–515. doi:10.1080/02699931.2015.1018817
  • Hacker, P. M. S. (2012). The relevance of Wittgenstein’s philosophy of psychology to the psychological sciences. In P. Stekeler-Weithofer (Eds.), Wittgenstein: Zu Philosophie und Wissenschaft (pp. 205–223). Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
  • Hammersley, M. (1987). Some notes on the terms 'validity' and 'reliability.'. British Educational Research Journal, 13(1), 73–81. doi:10.1080/0141192870130107
  • Hammersley, M. (2006). Philosophy's contribution to social science research on education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40(2), 273–286. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9752.2006.00504.x
  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2006). Ethnography: principles in practice. Routledge.
  • Harre, R., & Gillett, G. (1994). The discursive mind. London: Sage.
  • Höffding, H. (1892). Outlines of psychology. London: Macmillan; (M. E. Lowndes, Trans.).
  • Hurlburt, R. T., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2011). Presuppositions and background assumptions. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18(1), 206–333.
  • Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy. Chicago. Northwestern University Press; (D. Carr, Trans).
  • Hutto, D. D. (2009). Lessons from Wittgenstein: Elucidating folk psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 27(2), 197–212. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2008.04.014
  • Illouz, E., Gilon, D., & Shachak, M. (2014). Emotions and cultural theory. In J. E. Stets, & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions (Vol 2, pp. 221–244). New York, NY. Springer Science + Business Media.
  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol 1, pp. 183–198). New York, NY: Henry Holt and Co.
  • James, W. (1909). The meaning of truth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
  • Johnston, C. H. (1905). The present state of the psychology of feeling. Psychological Bulletin, 2(5), 161–171. doi:10.1037/h0072043
  • Kagan, J. (2007). What is emotion? History, measures, and meanings. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Kallio, E. (2011). Integrative thinking is the key: An evaluation of current research into the development of adult thinking. Theory & Psychology, 21(6), 785–801. doi:10.1177/0959354310388344
  • Kelly, G. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs (Vols. 1 & 2, New York, NY: W. W. Norton).
  • Kilner, J. M., & Lemon, R. N. (2013). What we know currently about mirror neurons. Current Biology, 2, R1057–R1062. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.051
  • Kjosavik, F. (2012). A phenomenological approach to intersubjectivity in the Sciences. In Intersubjectivity and objectivity in Adam Smith and Edmund Husserl: A collection of essays. Heusenstamm bei Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.
  • Krause, M. S. (2012). Measurement validity is fundamentally a matter of definition, not correlation. Review of General Psychology, 16(4), 391–400. doi:10.1037/a0027701
  • Lavelli, M., & Fogel, A. (2013). Interdyad differences in early mother–infant face-to-face communication: Real-time dynamics and developmental pathways. Developmental Psychology, 49(12), 2257–2271. doi:10.1037/a0032268
  • Lawn, C. (2003). Wittgenstein, history and hermeneutics. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 29, 281–296. doi:10.1177/0191453703029003002
  • Legerstee, M., & Markova, G. (2008). Variations in 10-month-old infant imitation of people and things. Infant Behavior & Development, 31(1), 81–91.doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2007.07.006.
  • Lewes, G. H. (1879). Subjective analysis and the introspective method. In Problems of life and mind: Third series, problem the first, The study of psychology: Its object, scope, and method (pp. 82–89). Boston, MA. Houghton, Mifflin and Company.
  • Liberman, K. (2012). Semantic drift in conversations. Human Studies, 35(2), 263–277. doi:10.1007/s10746-012-9225-1
  • Lindsay-Hartz, J., de Rivera, J., & Mascolo, M. F. (1995). Guilt and shame and their effects on motivation. In K. W. Fischer, & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Self-Conscious emotions: Shame, guilt, embarrassment and pride (pp. 274–300). New York. Guilford.
  • Mari, L., Carbone, P., & Giordani, A. O. (2017). A structural interpretation of measurement and some related epistemological issues. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 65, 6646–6656. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.08.001
  • Martin, J., & Sugarman, J. (2009). Does interpretation in psychology differ from interpretation in natural science?. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 39(1), 19–37. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00394.x
  • Mascolo, M. F. (2009). Wittgenstein and the discursive analysis of emotion. New Ideas in Psychology, 27(2), 258–274. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2008.04.004
  • Mascolo, M. F. (2016). Beyond subjectivity and objectivity: The intersubjective foundations of psychological science. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 50, 185–195.
  • Mascolo, M. F. (2017). How objectivity undermines the study of personhood: Toward an intersubjective epistemology for psychological science. New Ideas in Psychology, 33, 41–48. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2016.11.005
  • Mascolo, M. F., Basseches, M., & El-Hashem, A. (2014). Toward an integrated constructionist psychology: The coactive construction of meaning. In J. D. Raskin, S. K. Bridges, & J. S. Kahn (Eds.), Studies in Meaning (Vol. 5, pp. 246–299). New York: Pace University Press.
  • Matusov, E. (1996). Intersubjectivity without agreement. Mind, Culture & Activity, 3, 25–45. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca0301_4
  • McCune, L., & Zlatev, J. (2015). Dynamic systems in semiotic development: The transition to reference. Cognitive Development, 36, 161–170. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.09.010
  • Meltzoff, A. N. (2013). Origins of social cognition: Bidirectional self-other mapping and the 'like-me' hypothesis. InM. R. Banaji, S. A. Gelman, M. R. Banaji, & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Navigating the social world: What infants, children, and other species can teach us (pp. 139–144). New York, NY. Oxford University Press.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). The Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge; (D. A. Landes, Trans.).
  • Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83(4), 435–450. doi:10.2307/2183914
  • Nagy, E., Pilling, K., Watt, R., Pal, A., & Orvos, H. (2017). Neonates’ responses to repeated exposure to a still face. PLoS ONE, 12(8): e0181688.
  • Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ortony, A., & Turner, T. (1990). What’s basic about basic emotions. Psychological Review, 97(3), 315–331. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.97.3.315
  • Overgaard, S. (2006). The problem of other minds: Wittgenstein’s phenomenological perspective. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 5(1), 53–73. doi:10.1007/s11097-005-9014-7
  • Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Potter, J. (2012a). Re-reading discourse and social psychology: Transforming social psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 436–455. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02085.x
  • Potter, J. (2012b). How to study experience. Discourse & Society, 23, 576–588. doi:10.1177/0957926512455884
  • Procter, H. (2016). Relational construct psychology. In D. A. Winter, N. Reed, D. A. Winter, & N. Reed (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of personal construct psychology (pp. 167–177). London, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Purshouse, L. (2001). Embarrassment: A philosophical analysis. Philosophy: The Journal of the Royal Institute of Philosophy, 76(4), 515–540. doi:10.1017/S0031819101000547
  • Racine, T. P., & Carpendale, J. M. (2008). The embodiment of mental states. In W. F. Overton, U. Müller, J. L. Newman, W. F. Overton, U. Müller, & J. L. Newman (Eds.), Developmental perspectives on embodiment and consciousness (pp. 159–190). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Raskin, J. D. (2016). Personal construct psychology in relation to an integrative constructivism. In D. A. Winter, N. Reed, D. A. Winter, & N. Reed (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of personal construct psychology (pp. 34–44). London, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Reddy, V. (2015). Joining intentions in infancy. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 22, 24–44.
  • Reddy, V. (2008). Experiencing others: A second-person approach to other-awareness. In U. Müller, J. Carpendale, N. Budwig, & B. W. Sokol (Eds), Social life and social knowledge: Toward a process account of development (pp. 123–144). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Reiss, J., & Sprenger, J. (2017). Scientific Objectivity. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Archive (Winter 2017 Edition). Retreived from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/scientific-objectivity/.
  • Rorty, R. (1982). The consequences of pragmatism. Sussex, UK: Harvester.
  • Rowbottom, D. P. (2008). Intersubjective corroboration. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 39(1), 124–132. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.11.010.
  • Russell, B. (1912). The problems of philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Sabini, J., & Silver, M. (1997). In defense of shame: Shame in the context of guilt and embarrassment. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 27(1), 1–15. doi:10.1111/1468-5914.00023
  • Scherer, K. R., & Ellgring, H. (2007). Multimodal expression of emotion: Affect programs or componential appraisal patterns? Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 7(1), 158–171. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.1.158
  • Shotter, J. (2017). Persons as dialogical-hermeneutical-relational beings—New circumstances 'call out' new responses from us. New Ideas in Psychology, 4434–4440. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2016.11.007
  • Shotter, J. (2006). From minds hidden in the heads of individuals to the use of mind-talk between us: Wittgensteinian developmental investigations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 36(3), 279–297. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2006.00310.x
  • Sully, J. (1892). The data and the method of psychology. In The human mind: A text-book of psychology, in two volumes (vol 1, 14–35). New York, NY: D. Appleton & Company.
  • ter Hark, M. (1990). Beyond the inner and the outer: Wittgenstein’s philosophy of psychology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Thagard, P. (2007). Coherence, truth and the development of scientific knowledge. Philosophy of Science, 74(1), 28–47. doi:10.1086/520941
  • Titchener, E. B. (1911). A note of the consciousness of self. The American Journal of Psychology, 22(4), 540–552. doi:10.2307/1412798
  • Trevarthen, C. (1993). The self born in intersubjectivity: The psychology of an infant communicating. In U. Neisser (Ed.), The perceived self: Ecological and interpersonal sources of self-knowledge (pp. 121–173). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Trevarthen, C. (2009). The functions of emotion in infancy: The regulation and communication of rhythm, sympathy, and meaning in human development. In D. Fosha, D. J. Siegel, M. F. Solomon, D. Fosha, D. J. Siegel, & M. F. Solomon (Eds.), The healing power of emotion: Affective neuroscience, development & clinical practice (pp. 55–85). New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
  • Valsiner, J. (in press). Methodology without the method: Rebuilding psychology into a developmental science. In M. Mascolo, & T. Bidell (Eds.), Handbook of integrative psychological development. New York, NY: Routlege.
  • Verhagan, A. (2008). Intersubjectivity and the architecture of the language system. In J. Zlatev, T. P. Racine, C. Sinha, E. Itkonen, J. Zlatev, T. P. Racine, … E. Itkonen (Eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity (pp. 307–331). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Wegner, D. (2003). The illusion of free will. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Williams, R. N. & Robinson, D. N. (eds). (2017). Scientism: The New Orthodoxy. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell; (G. E. M. Anscombe, trans.).
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1980a). Remarks on the philosophy of psychology. (I), Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1980b). Remarks on the philosophy of psychology (II), Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1992). Last writings on the philosophy of psychology (II), Oxford: Blackwell; (C. G. Luckhardt & M. A. E. Aue, Trans.).
  • Woodworth, R. S. (1931). Contemporary schools of psychology. New York, NY: Ronald Press Company.
  • Wundt, W. (1907). General survey of the subject. In Outlines of psychology3rd rev. English ed. (pp. 28–30). Leipzig, Germany: Wilhelm Engelmann (C. H. Judd, Trans.).
  • Zahavi, D. (2006). Subjectivity and selfhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Zeedyk, M. S. (2006). From intersubjectivity to subjectivity: The transformative roles of emotional Intimacy and imitation. Infant and Child Development, 15(3), 321–344. doi:10.1002/icd.457
  • Zlatev, J., Racine, T. P., Sinha, C., & Itkonen, E. (2008). The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.