References
- Brown, J. R. (2011). The laboratory of the mind: Thought experiments in the natural sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Giere, R. N. (2004). How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science, 71(5), 742–752. doi:10.1086/425063
- Godfrey-Smith, P. (2011). Dewey and the Subject-Matter of Science. In J. Shook, & P. Kurtz (Eds.), Dewey’s Enduring Impact: Essays on America's Philosopher (pp. 73–86). New York, NY: Prometheus Books.
- Fransella, F. (1995). George Kelly. London, England: Sage.
- Hetherington, S. (2002). Fallibilism and knowing that one is not dreaming. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 32(1), 83–102. doi:10.1080/00455091.2002.10716512
- Kelly, G. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. 2, New York, NY: Norton.
- Kitcher, P. (2012). Preludes to Pragmatism: Toward a reconstruction of philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Leite, A. (2010). Fallibilism. In J. Dancy, E. Sosa, & M. Steup (Eds.), A Companion to Epistemology. 2nd ed (pp. 370–375). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
- Mascolo, M., & Kallio, E. (this issue). The phenomenology of between: An intersubjective epistemology for psychological science. Journal of Constructivist Psychology,
- Russell, B. (1911). Knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 11(1), 108–128. doi:10.1093/aristotelian/11.1.108
- Stanley, J., & Williamson, T. (2001). Knowing how. Journal of Philosophy, 98(8), 411–444. doi:10.2307/2678403
- Stuart, M. (2018). How thought experiments increase understanding. In M. Stuart, J. Yiftach, H. Fehige, & J. Brown (Eds), The Routledge companion to thought experiments (pp. 526–544). London, England: Routledge.
- Whewell, W. (1844). The philosophy of the inductive sciences 2, London, England: J. Parker.