“It’s Understandable Enough, Right?” The Natural Accountability of a Mathematics Lesson

REFERENCES

• Abrahamson, D., Gutiérrez, J., & Baddorf, A. K. (2012). Try to see it my way: The discursive function of idiosyncratic mathematical metaphor. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 14, 55–80. doi:10.1080/10986065.2012.625076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alibali, M., & Nathan, M. J. (2012). Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from learners’ and teachers’ gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 247–286. doi:10.1080/10508406.2011.611446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D., & Bass, H. (2000). Making believe: The collective construction of public mathematical knowledge in the elementary classroom. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 98, 193–224.
   Google Scholar
• Bolden, G. B. (2009). Implementing incipient actions: The discourse marker ‘so’ in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 974–998. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M., & Livingston, E. (1981). The work of discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of Social Science, 11, 131–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiffenhagen, C., & Sharrock, W. (2011). Does mathematics look certain in the front, but fallible in the back? Social Studies of Science, 41, 839–866. doi:10.1177/0306312711424789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R., & Nemirovsky, R. (Eds.). (2012). Introduction to the special issue: Modalities of body engagement in mathematical activity and learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 207–215. doi:10.1080/10508406.2011.611447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi, M. (2005). Discourse within a sentence: An exploration of postpositions in Japanese as an interactional resource. Language in Society, 33, 343–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbst, P. (2005). Knowing ‘equal area’ while proving a claim about equal areas. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 25, 11–56.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, P., & Brach, C. (2006). Proving and doing proofs in high school geometry classes: What is it that is going on for students? Cognition and Instruction, 24, 73–122. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2401_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., … Wearne, D. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 12–21. doi:10.3102/0013189X025004012
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., et al. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2003013
   Google Scholar
• Hufferd-Ackles, K., Fuson, K. C., & Sherin, M. G. (2004). Describing levels and components of a math-talk learning community. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 81–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. (1963). Proofs and refutations (I). The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, XIV, 1–25, 120–139, 221–243, 296–342. doi:10.1093/bjps/XIV.53.1
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 29–63. doi:10.3102/00028312027001029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampert, M., & Cobb, P. (2003). Communication and language. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles of and standards for school mathematics (pp. 237–249). Reston, VA: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Livingston, E. (1983). An ethnomethodological investigation of the foundations of mathematics ( Unpublished dissertation). University of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Livingston, E. (1987). Making sense of ethnomethodology. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Livingston, E. (1999). Cultures of proving. Social Studies of Science, 29, 867–888. doi:10.1177/030631299029006003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingston, E. (2008). Context and detail in studies of the witnessable social order: Puzzles, maps, checkers, and geometry. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 840–862. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, C. A., Davis, R. B., & Alston, A. A. (1991). Implementing a ‘thinking curriculum’ in mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10, 219–224.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (1979). The conceptual basis of language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., O’Connor, M. C., & Resnick, L. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27, 283–297. doi:10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, J., & Koschmann, T. (2012). Good reasons for seemingly bad performance: Competence and its assessment at the chalkboard. In G. R. Hougaard, C. E. Brouwer, D. Day, & A. Hougaard (Eds.), Evaluating ‘cognitive competences’ in interaction (pp. 89–117). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Moschkovich, J. N. (2008). “I went by twos, he went by one”: Multiple interpretations of inscriptions as resources for mathematical discussions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 551–587. doi:10.1080/10508400802395077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Núñez, R. (2008). A fresh look at the foundations of mathematics: Gesture and the psychological reality of conceptual metaphor. In A. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Gesture and metaphor (pp. 93–114). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Pólya, G. (1954). Mathematics and plausible reasoning ( Vol. 1: Induction and analogy in mathematics). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L., Edwards, L., & Arzello, F. (Eds.). (2009). Introduction: Beyond words. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 91–95. doi:10.1007/s10649-008-9172-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romberg, T. A., & Kaput, J. J. (1999). Mathematics worth teaching, mathematics worth understanding. In E. Fennema & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 3–17). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 15–21). New York, NY: Irvington.
   Google Scholar
• Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1991). On mathematics as sense-making: An informal attack on the unfortunate divorce of formal and informal mathematics. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 311–343). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A., & Kieran, C. (2001). Cognition as communication: Rethinking learning-by-talking through multi-faceted analysis of students’ mathematical interactions. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 8, 42–76. doi:10.1207/S15327884MCA0801_04
   Google Scholar
• Shimizu, Y. (2002, May). Capturing the structure of Japanese mathematics lessons: Some findings of the international comparative studies. Paper presented at the International Commission on Mathematical Instruction (ICMI) 2nd East Asian Conference on Mathematics Education and the 9th Southeast Asian Conference on Mathematics Education, National Institute of Education, Singapore. Retrieved from http://cimm.ucr.ac.cr/ojs/index.php/eudoxus/article/view/377/378
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, J., & Nemirovsky, R. (2005). Mathematical conversations. In D. Carraher & R. Nemirovsky Eds., Medium and meaning: Video papers in mathematics education research [Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph, Vol. XIII] (CD-ROM). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, G. (2013). Translating Euclid: Designing a human-centered mathematics. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10, 313–340. doi:10.1080/10986060802229675
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. P. (2003). Garfinkel’s radical program. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 36, 487–494. doi:10.1207/S15327973RLSI3604_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar