2,111
Views
37
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Youth as historical actors in the production of possible futures

, , , , , ORCID Icon, , & show all

References

  • Activision. (2019). Call of Duty: Black Ops security & enforcement policy. Retrieved from https://support.activision.com/articles/en_US/FAQ/Call-of-Duty-Black-Ops-III-Security-Enforcement-Policy/
  • Ballard, R. L. (2009). The most exciting thing: Researcher ethics and personal ethics. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2009(120), 55–64.
  • Barron, B., Gomez, K., Pinkard, N., & Martin, C. K. (2014). The digital youth network: Cultivating digital media citizenship in urban communities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Boal, A. (2000). Theater of the oppressed (C. A. McBride, M. L. McBride, & E. Fryer, Eds. & Trans.). Sidmouth, England: Pluto Press.
  • Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Cole, M, & Griffin, P. (1983). A socio-historical approach to re-mediation. The Quarterly Newletter Of The Laborator Of Comparative Human Cognition, 5, 69–74.
  • Edwards, A. (Ed). (2017). Working relationally in and across practices: A cultural-historical approach to collaboration. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Engeström, Y. (1986). The zone of proximal development as the basic category of educational psychology. The Quarterly Newsletter of LCHC, 8, 23–42.
  • Engeström, Y. (1990). Learning, working and imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
  • Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Vähäaho, T. (1999). When the center does not hold: The importance of knotworking. In S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard, & U. J. Jensen (Eds.), Activity theory and social practice (pp. 345–374). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
  • Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.
  • Engeström, Y. (2006). Development, movement and agency: Breaking away into mycorrhizae activities. In K. Yamazumi (Ed.), Building activity theory in practice: Toward the next generation (CHAT Technical Reports #1). Osaka, Japan: Center for Human Activity Theory, Kansai University.
  • Espinoza, M. (2009). A case study of educational sanctuary in one migrant classroom. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(1), 44–62.
  • Espinoza, M. L. (2003). UCLA statewide migrant student institute curriculum [Program of Studies]. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles.
  • Espinoza, M. L. (2008). Humanization and social dreaming: A case study of changing social relations in a summer migrant educational program ( Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/304654620?Pq-origsite1⁄4gscholar
  • Garcia, A. (2017). Privilege, power, and dungeons & dragons: How systems shape racial and gender identities in tabletop role-playing games. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 24(3), 1–15.
  • Gildersleeve, R. E. (2010). Fracturing opportunity: Mexican migrant students & college-going literacy (Vol. 362). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
  • Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.
  • Gutiérrez, K. D. (2005, April). Intersubjectivity and the grammar of the third space. Scribner Award Lecture presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Gutiérrez, K. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164.
  • Gutiérrez, K. D. (2016). Designing resilient ecologies: Social design experiments and a new social imagination. Educational Researcher, 45(3), 187–196.
  • Gutiérrez, K. D. (2018). Social design-based experiments: A proleptic approach to literacy. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 67, 86–108. doi:10.1177.2381336918787823
  • Gutiérrez, K. D., Cortes, K., Cortez, A., DiGiacomo, D., Higgs, J., Johnson, P., … Vakil, S. (2017). Replacing representation with imagination: Finding ingenuity in everyday practices. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 30–60.
  • Gutiérrez, K. D., & Jurow, A. S. (2016). Social design experiments: Toward equity by design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 565–598.
  • Haapasaari, A., Engeström, Y., & Kerosuo, H. (2016). The emergence of learners’ transformative agency in a change laboratory intervention. Journal of Education and Work, 29(2), 232–262.
  • Harrell, D. F. (2013). Phantasmal media: An approach to imagination, computation, and expression. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Her Many Horses, I. (2016). From lived experiences to game creation: How scaffolding supports elementary school students learning computer science principles in an after school setting ( Doctoral dissertation). University of Colorado. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1794166766
  • Jurow, A. S., & Shea, M. (2015). Learning in equity-oriented scale-making projects. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(2), 286–307.
  • Lynch, T. L. (2017). Below the screen: Why multiliteracies research needs to embrace software. English Journal, 106, 92–94.
  • Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117.
  • McDermott, R., & Raley, J. (2011). Looking closely: Toward a natural history of human ingenuity. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The Sage handbook of visual research methods (pp. 372–391). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Nasir, N., & Vakil, S. (2017). STEM-focused academies in urban schools: Tensions and possibilities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 376–406.
  • Nuñez, A. M. (2009). Migrant students’ college access: Emerging evidence from the Migrant student leadership institute. Journal of Latinos and Education, 8(3), 181–198.
  • Pacheco, M. (2012). Learning in/through everyday resistance: A cultural-historical perspective on community resources and curriculum. Educational Researcher, 41(4), 121–132.
  • Patel, L. (2015). Decolonizing educational research: From ownership to answerability. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Repenning, A. (2000). AgentSheets®: An interactive simulation environment with end-user programmable agents. Interaction. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?
  • Rivero, E., & Gutiérrez, K. D. (2019). “You know what’s glitching?”: Emergent digital literacies in video game play. In O. Erstad, R. Flewitt, B. Kümmerling-Meibauer, & I. S. Pires Pereira (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of digital literacies in early childhood (pp. 158–168). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Sannino, A. (2015). The emergence of transformative agency and double stimulation: Activity-based studies in the Vygotskian tradition. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 4, 1–3.
  • Sannino, A., & Engeström, Y. (2017). Relational agency, double stimulation, and the object of activity: An intervention study in a primary school. In A. Edwards (Ed.), Working relationally in and across practices: A cultural-historical approach to collaboration (pp. 58–77). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schwartz, L., & Gutiérrez, K. (2015). Literacy studies and situated methods: Exploring the social organization of household activity and family media use. In J. Rowsell & K. Pahl (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of literacy studies (pp. 575–592). New York, NY: Routledge Publishers.
  • Schwartz, L. H., DiGiacomo, D., & Gutiérrez, K. D. (2015). Designing “contexts for tinkerability” with undergraduates and children within the El Pueblo Mágico social design experiment. IJREE–International Journal for Research on Extended Education, 3(1), 94–113.
  • Smith, M. R., & Marx, L. (1994). Does technology drive history?: The dilemma of technological determinism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Tuck, E. (2009). Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79(3), 409–428.
  • Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2014). Unbecoming claims: Pedagogies of refusal in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 811–818.
  • Virkkunen, J. (2006). Dilemmas in building shared transformative agency. Activités Revue Électronique, 3(1), 43–66.
  • Vossoughi, S. (2014). Social analytic artifacts made concrete: A study of learning and political education. Mind, Culture and Activity, 21(4), 353–373.
  • Vossoughi, S., & Espinoza, M. (2014). Boal’s children: Theatre for the people. B|ta’arof, 3, 50–53.
  • Vossoughi, S., & Gutiérrez, K. (2014). Studying movement, hybridity, and change: Toward a multi-sited sensibility for research on learning across contexts and borders. National Society for the Study of Education, 113(2), 603–632.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Westley, F. R., Tjornbo, O., Schultz, L., Olsson, P., Folke, C., Crona, B., & Bodin, Ö. (2013). A theory of transformative agency in linked social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 18(3), 27.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.