Young people, digital mediation, and transformative agency, special issue (part 2)

References

• Bodrožić, Z, & Adler, P. S. (2018). The evolution of management models: a neo-schumpeterian theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(1), 85–129. doi: 10.1177/0001839217704811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudron, S. (2015). Young children (0–8) and digital technology. A qualitative exploratory study across seven countries. European Commission. Joint Research Centre Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2788/00749
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: a once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed (Ed), Distributed cognitions, psychological and educational considerations (pp. pp. 1–49). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, P. (2012). Reinventing participation: Civic agency and the web environment. Geopolitics, History, and International Relations, 4(2), 27–45.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2006). Development, movement and agency: Breaking away into mycorrhizae activities. In K. Yamazumi (Ed.), Building activity theory in practice: Toward the next generation (pp. 1–43). Center for Human Activity Theory, Kansai University (CHAT Technical Reports #1). Osaka: Kansai University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2016). Studies in expansive learning: Learning what is not yet there. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erstad, O., & Sefton-Green, J. (2013). Digital disconnect? The ‘digital learner’ and the school. In O. Erstad & J. Sefton-Green (Eds.), Identity, community and learning lives in the digital age (pp. 87–106). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Espinoza, M. L. (2003). UCLA Statewide Migrant Student Institute curriculum [Program of Studies]. Los Angeles, CA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1967). Educação como prática da liberdade [Education as liberty practice]. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. A. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. New York: Bergin & Garvey Publishers Inc. doi:10.2307/2074233
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164. doi:10.1598/RRQ.43.2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haapasaari, A., Engeström, Y., & Kerosuo, H. (2016). The emergence of learners’ transformative agency in a change laboratory intervention. Journal of Education and Work, 29(2), 232–262. doi:10.1080/13639080.2014.900168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedegaard, M. (2012). Analyzing children’s learning and development in everyday settings from a cultural-historical wholeness approach. Mind, Culture and Activity,19(2), 127–138. doi:10.1080/10749039.2012.665560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., … Watkins, S. G. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135–142. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumpulainen, P. K., Kajamaa, A. M., & Rajala, A. (2019). Motive-demand dynamics creating a social context for students’ learning experiences in a making and design environment. In A. Edwards, M. Fleer, & L. Bottcher (Eds.), Cultural-historical approaches to studying learning and development: Societal, institutional and personal perspectives (pp. 185–201). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Leander, K. M, Phillips, N. C, & Taylor, K. H. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning: mapping new mobilities. Review Of Research in Education, 34(1), 329–394. doi: 10.3102/0091732X09358129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture and Activity, 7(4), 273–290. doi:10.1207/S15327884MCA0704_03
   Google Scholar
• Lemos, M. (2017). Collaborative agency in educational management: A joint object for school and community transformation. RAE; Revista De Administração De Empresas, 57(6), 555–566. doi:10.1590/S0034-759020170604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., Hietajärvi, L., Palonen, T., Salmela-Aro, K., & Hakkarainen, K. (2017). Adolescents’ Social networks: Exploring different patterns of socio-digital participation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(3), 255–274. doi:10.1080/00313831.2015.1120236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., & Gorzig, A. (Eds). (2012). Children, risk and safety on the internet: Research and policy challenges in comparative perspective. Policy Press: Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, P. (1995). Critical pedagogy and predatory culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miettinen, R. (1999). The riddle of things: Activity theory and actor-network theory as approaches to studying innovations. Mind, Culture and Activity, 6(3), 170–195. doi:10.1080/10749039909524725
   Google Scholar
• Miettinen, R. (2013). Creative encounters and collaborative agency in science, technology and innovation. In K. Thomas & J. Chan (Eds.), Handbook of research on creativity (pp. 435–449). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2017). The OECD handbook for innovative learning environments. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/9789264277274-en
   Google Scholar
• Rajala, A., Hilppö, J., Lipponen, L., & Kumpulainen, K. (2013). Expanding the chronotopes of schooling for the promotion of students’ agency. In O. Erstad & J. Sefton-Green (Eds.), Identity, community, and learning lives in the digital age (pp. 107–125). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sannino, A. (2015). The emergence of transformative agency and double stimulation: Activity-based studies in the Vygotskian tradition. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 4, 1–3. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stetsenko, A. (2008). From relational ontology to transformative activist stance: Expanding Vygotsky’s (CHAT) project. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 465–485. doi:10.1007/s11422-008-9111-3
   Google Scholar
• Vossoughi, S., Hooper, P. K., & Escudé, M. (2016). Making through the lens of culture and power: Toward transformative visions for educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 86(2), 206–232. doi:10.17763/0017-8055.86.2.206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). The problem of the environment. In J. Van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 338–354). Cambridge: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Child psychology (Vol. 5). New york: Plenum.
   Google Scholar