References
- Baerentsen, K. B., & Trettvik, J. (2002). An activity theory approach to affordance. In Proc. NordiCHI 2002 (pp. 51–60). ACM Press. Aarhus, Denmark.
- Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), The dialogical imagination: Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin (pp. 259–422). University of Texas Press.
- Bang, M., & Vossoughi, S. (2016). Participatory design research and educational justice: Studying learning and relations within social change making. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 173–193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1181879
- Bouillion, L. M., & Gomez, L. M. (2001). Connecting school and community with science learning: Real world problems and school–community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 878–898. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1037
- Bowen, G. M., & Roth, W. M. (2002). Why students may not learn to interpret scientific inscriptions. Research in Science Education, 32(3), 303–327. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020833231966
- Bowker, G., Star, S. L., Turner, W., & Gasser, L. (Eds.). (1997). Social science, technical systems and cooperative work: Beyond the great divide. Erlbaum.
- Cairo, A. (2013). The functional art: An introduction to information graphics and visualization. New Riders.
- Cole, M. (1995). Socio-cultural-historical psychology: Some general remarks and a proposal for a new kind of culturalgenetic methodology. In J. Wertsch, P. Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural Studies of Mind (pp. 187–214). Cambridge University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174299.010
- Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Harvard University.
- Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Cornet, V., Voida, S., & Holden, R. J. (2018). Activity theory analysis of heart failure self-care. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 25(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2017.1372785
- Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
- Enyedy, N. (2005). Inventing mapping: Creating cultural forms to solve collective problems. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4), 427–466. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2304_1
- Enyedy, N., Polman, J. L., Graville Smith, C., Bang, M., Warren, B., Rosebery, A. S., Burke, J., Wagmister, F., Bolling, A., Fitz-Gibbon, T., Halverson, E. R., & Nasir, N. (2014). Learning and becoming through art-making: Relationships among tools, phenomena, people, and communities in shaping youth identity development. In J. L. Polman, E. A. Kyza, D. K. O’Neill, I. Tabak, W. R. Penuel, A. S. Jurow, K. O’Connor, T. Lee, & L. D’Amico (Eds.), Learning and becoming in practice: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences 2014 (pp. 1436–1445). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
- Gaydos, M. J., & Devane, B. M. (2019). Designing for identity in game-based learning. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 26(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2019.1572764
- Gebre, E. H. (2018). Young adults understanding and use of data: Insights for fostering secondary school students’ data literacy. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 18(4), 330. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-018-0034-z
- Gebre, E. H., & Polman, J. L. (2016). Developing young adults’ representational competence through infographic-based science news reporting. International Journal of Science Education, 38(18), 2667–2687. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1258129
- Gebre, E. H., & Polman, J. L. (2020). From “context” to “active contextualization”: Fostering learner agency in contextualizing learning through science news reporting. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 24, 100374. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100374
- Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25(1), 99–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1167322
- Gee, J. P. (2008). Video games and embodiment. Games and Culture, 3(3–4), 253–263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412008317309
- Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
- Graville, C., Polman, J., Morgan, T., Englander, C., Fair, J., Lott, K., McGartland, T., Merrill, B., Morganfield, K., Moore, D., O’Brien, A., Rush, A., Shanahan, P., Swenson, E., Sylar, B., Teasedale, M., & White, E. (2019). Research as learning from youth: Leveraging collaborative digital tools to position youth as experts on themselves. In K. Lund, G. Niccolai, E. Lavoué, C. Hmelo-Silver, G. Gweon, & M. Baker (Eds.), A wide lens: Combining embodied, enactive, extended, and embedded learning in collaborative settings, 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Volume 2 (pp. 929–930). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
- Hall, S. (1996). Who needs “Identity”? In P. Du Gay & S. Hall (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 1–17). SAGE Publications.
- Hammerman, J. K., & Rubin, A. (2004). Strategies for managing statistical complexity with new software tools. Statistics Education Research Journal, 3(2), 17–41.
- Herrenkohl, L. R., & Mertl, V. (2011). How students come to be, know, and do: A case for a broad view of learning. Cambridge University Press.
- Hollan, J. D., Hutchins, E. L., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: A new theoretical foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-human Interaction, 7(2),174–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/353485.353487
- Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Jr, Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Harvard University Press.
- Holland, D., & Lave, J. (2009). Social practice theory and the historical production of persons. Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 2(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6826-4_15
- Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. MIT Press.
- Hutchins, E. (2010). Cognitive ecology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(4), 705–715https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01089.x
- Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2012). Affordances in HCI: Toward a mediated action perspective. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 967–976). Association for Computing Machinery, New York.
- Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2018). Activity theory as a framework for human-technology interaction research. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 25(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2017.1393089
- Latour, B. (1996). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale welt, 47,369–381. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483346229.n12
- Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge University Press.
- Lave, J., & Packer, M. (2008). Towards a social ontology of learning. In K. Nielsen, S. Brinkmann, C. Elmholdt, L. Tanggaard, P. Musaeus, & G. Kraft (Eds.), A qualitative stance (pp. 17–46). Aarhus University Press.
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
- Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 371–387). Cambridge University Press.
- Lemke, J. (1998). Multimedia literacy demands of the scientific curriculum. Linguistics and Education, 10(3), 247–271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/s0898-5898(99)00009-1
- Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273–290. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0704_03
- Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Prentice-Hall.
- Light, A. (2011). HCI as heterodoxy: Technologies of identity and the queering of interaction with computers✩. Interacting with Computers, 23(5), 430–438. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.02.002
- Luria, A. R. (1928). The problem of the cultural development of child. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 35(4), 493–506. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08856559.1928.10532168
- Merriam, S. B. (1998). qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and expanded from” Case study research in education.”. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
- Nasir, N. S., & Cooks, J. (2009). Becoming a hurdler: How learning settings afford identities. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 40(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1492.2009.01027.x
- Nation, J. M., & Durán, R. P. (2019). Home is where the heart is: Latinx youth expression and identity in a critical maker project. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 26(3), 249–265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2019.1655062
- National Research Council. (2012) . A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
- Norman, D. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books.
- Norman, D. A. (1991). Cognitive artifacts. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface (pp. 17–38). Cambridge University Press.
- Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart. Addison-Wesley.
- Packer, M. J. (2011). Schooling: Domestication or ontological construction?. In T. D. Koschmann (Ed.), Theories of learning and studies of instructional practice (pp. 167–188). Springer.
- Packer, M. J., & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational psychologist, 35(4), 227–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3504_02
- Packer, M. J., & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 35(4), 227–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3504_02
- Polman, J. L. (2006). Mastery and appropriation as means to understand the interplay of history learning and identity trajectories. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 221–259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1502_3
- Polman, J. L., & Gebre, E. H. (2015). Towards critical appraisal of infographics as scientific inscriptions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(6), 868–893. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21225
- Polman, J. L., & Miller, D. (2010). Changing stories: Trajectories of identification among African American youth in a science outreach apprenticeship. American Educational Research Journal, 47(4), 879–918. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210367513
- Roth, W. M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science education, 88(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10113
- Roth, W. M., & McGinn, M. K. (1998). Inscriptions: Toward a theory of representing as social practice. Review of Educational Research, 68(1), 35–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068001035
- Silseth, K., & Arnseth, H. C. (2011). Learning and identity construction across sites: A dialogical approach to analysing the construction of learning selves. Culture & Psychology, 17(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X10388842
- Silseth, K., & Arnseth, H. C. (2016). Frames for learning science: Analyzing learner positioning in a technology-enhanced science project. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(2), 396–415. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1100636
- Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: Learning to see in technoscience. In M. Lampert & M. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 107–149). Cambridge University Press.
- Suchman, L. (2000). Organizing alignment: A case of bridge-building. Organization, 7(2), 311–327. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840072007
- Tufte, E. R. (2003). The cognitive style of PowerPoint (Vol. 2006). Graphics Press.
- Vågan, A. (2011). Towards a sociocultural perspective on identity formation in education. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 18(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10749031003605839
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works of LS vygotsky: Problems of the theory and history of psychology (Vol. 3). Springer Science & Business Media.
- Weidler-Lewis, J., & Polman, J. L. (2017, April). Enhancing scientific argumentation through infographic authoring. [Paper presented at the NARST Annual Meeting], San Antonio, TX.
- Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford University Press.
- Wortham, S. (2004). The interdependence of social identification and learning. American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 715–750. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041003715
- Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2010). Activity systems analysis methods: Understanding complex learning environments. Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6321-5