Cognitive-communication disorder following right hemisphere stroke: exploring rehabilitation access and outcomes.

References

• Thrift AG, Cadilhac DA, Thayabaranathan T, Howard G, Howard VJ, Rothwell PM, Donnan GA. Global stroke statistics. Int J Stroke. 2014;9:6–18.10.1111/ijs.12245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obembe AO, Eng JJ. Rehabilitation interventions for improving social participation after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016;30:384–392.10.1177/1545968315597072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. World Report on Disability. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Le Dorze G, Salois-Bellerose É, Alepins M, Croteau C, Hallé MC. A description of the personal and environmental determinants of participation several years post-stroke according to the views of people who have aphasia. Aphasiology. 2013;28:421–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N, Damico JS. Access and social inclusion in aphasia: Interactional principles and applications. Aphasiology. 2007;21:81–97.10.1080/02687030600798311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake ML. Right hemisphere strokes. Perspect ASHA SIG. 2016;1:63–65.
   Google Scholar
• Côté H, Payer M, Giroux F, Joanette Y. Towards a description of clinical communication impairment following right-hemisphere damage. Aphasiology. 2007;21(6–8):739–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papathanasiou I, Coppens P, Potagas C. Aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders. Burlington, VT: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ferré P, Joanette Y. Communication abilities following right hemisphere damage: Prevalence, evaluation, and profiles. Perspect ASHA SIG2016;1:106–115.
   Google Scholar
• Cherney LR, Halper AS, Kwasnica CM, Harvey RL, Zhang M. Recovery of functional status after right hemisphere stroke: Relationship with unilateral neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:322–328.10.1053/apmr.2001.21511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins CA, Baumgaertner A, Lehman MT, Fassbinder W. Mechanisms of discourse comprehension impairment after right hemisphere brain damage: In lexical ambiguity resolution. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000;43:62–78.10.1044/jslhr.4301.62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abusamra V, Côté H, Joanette Y, Ferreres A. Communication impairments in patients with right hemisphere damage. Life span disability. 2009;1:67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Togher L, McDonald S, Coelho CA, Byom L. Cognitive communication disability following TBI: Examining discourse, pragmatics, behaviour and executive function. In: Social and communication disorders following traumatic brain injury (2nd ed). London: Psychology Press; 2014:89–118.
   Google Scholar
• Berkman LF, Glass T, Brissette I, Seeman TE. From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:843–857.10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00065-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gialanella B, Bertolinelli M, Lissi M, Prometti P. Predicting outcome after stroke: The role of aphasia. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:122–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilari K, Northcott S, Roy P, Marshall J, Wiggins RD, Chataway J, Ames D. Psychological distress after stroke and aphasia: The first six months Clin Rehabil. 2010;24:181–190.
10.1177/0269215509346090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz N, Harman-Maeir A, Ring H. Soroker N. Relationships of cognitive performance and daily function of clients following right hemisphere stroke: Predictive and ecological validity of the LOTCA Battery. OccupTher J Res 2000; 20:3–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson I, Ridgeway V, Greenfield E, Parr A. Motor recovery after stroke depends on intact sustained attention: A 2-year follow-up study. Neuropsychology. 1997;11:290–295.10.1037/0894-4105.11.2.290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein MS, Kilbride C, Reynolds FA. What are the functional outcomes of right hemisphere stroke patients with or without hemi-inattention complications? A critical narrative review and suggestions for further research. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:315–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake M, Duffy JR, Myers PS, Tompkins CA. Prevalence and patterns of right hemisphere cognitive/communicative deficits: Retrospective data from an inpatient rehabilitation unit. Aphasiology 2002;16:537–547.10.1080/02687030244000194
   Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. The economic impact of stroke in Australia 2013. http://strokefoundation.com.au/site/media/NSF580_DeloitteReport2013_Summary_Final.pdf. Accessed April 10, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Benton E, Bryan K. Right cerebral hemisphere damage: Incidence of language problems. Int J Rehabil Res. 1996;19:47–54.10.1097/00004356-199603000-00005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joanette Y, Goulet P. Right hemisphere and verbal communication: Conceptual, methodological, and clinical issues. Clin Aphasiology. 1994;22:1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson B, Howe T, Worrall L, Hickson L, Togher L. Social participation for older people with aphasia: The impact of communication disability on friendships. Topics Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15:325–340.10.1310/tsr1504-325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry A, Morris M, Unsworth C, Duckett S, Skeat J, Dodd K, Taylor N, Reilly K. Therapy outcome measures for allied health practitioners in Australia: The AusTOMs. 2004;16:285–291.
   Google Scholar
• Kertesz A. The Western Aphasia Battery-revised. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ellmo WJ. Measure of Cognitive-linguistic Abilities. Vera Beach: The Speech Bin; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Swinburn K, Porter G, Howard D. Comprehensive Aphasia Test. Hove: Psychology Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Vertesi A, Lever JA, Molloy DW, Sanderson B, Tuttle I, Pokoradi L, Principi E. Standardized mini-mental state examination: Use and interpretation. Can Fam Physician. 2001;47:2018–2023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum C., Edwards D. Cognitive performance in senile dementia of the alzheimer’s type: The kitchen task assessment. Am J OccupTher. 1993;47(5):431–436.10.5014/ajot.47.5.431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (including the FIM(TM) instrument). Buffalo, NY: Buffalo State University of New York; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, Fiedler RC. The reliability of the functional independence measure: A quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:1226–1232.10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90184-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frymark T. FIM or foe? Functional independence measures fall short, data show. ASHA Leader. 2004;8:6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Brookshire RH. Introduction to Neurogenic Communication Disorders. 7th ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Myers PS. Right Hemisphere Damage: Disorders of Communication and Cognition. London: Singular; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie C, Brady M. Communication difficulties following right hemisphere stroke: Applying evidence to clinical management. Evid Based Commun Assess Interv 2008;2:235–247.
   Google Scholar
• Wozniak MA, Kittner SJ, Price TR, Hebel JR, Sloan MA, Gardner JF. Stroke location is not associated with return to work after first ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1999;30:2568–2573.10.1161/01.STR.30.12.2568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foerch C, Misselwitz B, Sitzer M, Berger K, Steinmetz H, Neumann-haefelin T, et al. Difference in recognition of right and left hemispheric stroke. J Med. 2005;366:392–393.
   Google Scholar
• Inouye M, Hashimoto H, Mio T, Sumino K. Influence of admission functional status on functional change after stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80:121–125.10.1097/00002060-200102000-00008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Stroke Audit – Rehabilitation Services Report. Melbourne: National Stroke Foundation; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Oczkowski W, Barreca S. The functional independence measure: Its use to identify rehabilitation needs in stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:1291–1294.10.1016/0003-9993(93)90081-K
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichol AD, Higgins AM, Gabbe BJ, Murray LJ, Cooper DJ, Cameron PA. Measuring functional and quality of life outcomes following major head injury: Common scales and checklists. Injury. 2011;42:281–287.10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N, Damico JS. Intervention outcomes: A clinical application of qualitative methods. Top Lang Disord. 2001;22:21–36.10.1097/00011363-200111000-00004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar