431
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Biofeedback vs. game scores for reducing trunk compensation after stroke: a randomized crossover trial

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 96-113 | Received 12 Sep 2017, Accepted 14 Oct 2017, Published online: 27 Oct 2017

References

  • Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL. What do motor “recovery” and “compensation” mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23(4):313–319. doi:10.1177/1545968308328727.
  • Pain LM, Baker R, Richardson D, Agur AMR. Effect of trunk-restraint training on function and compensatory trunk, shoulder and elbow patterns during post-stroke reach: A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;37(7):1–10. doi:10.3109/09638288.2014.932450.
  • Cirstea MC, Levin MF. Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain. 2000;123(5):940–953. doi:10.1093/brain/awg266.
  • Jones TA. Motor compensation and its effects on neural reorganization after stroke. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18(5):267–280. doi:10.1038/nrn.2017.26.
  • Roby-Brami A, Feydy A, Combeaud M, Biryukova EV, Bussel B, Levin MF. Motor compensation and recovery for reaching in stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand. 2003;107(5):369–381 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12713530.10.1034/j.1600-0404.2003.00021.x
  • Valdés B, Glegg S, Van der Loos HFM. Trunk compensation during bimanual reaching at different heights by healthy and hemiparetic adults. J Mot Behav. 2017;49(5):580–592. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2016.1241748.
  • Van der Loos HFM, Reinkensmeyer D. Rehabilitation and Health Care Robotics. Springer Handb Rob. 2008:1223–1251. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30301-5_54.
  • Lohse KR, Hilderman CGE, Cheung KL, Tatla S, Van der Loos HFM. Virtual reality therapy for adults post-stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis exploring virtual environments and commercial games in therapy. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e93318. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093318.
  • Kharrazi H, Lu AS, Gharghabi F, Coleman W. A scoping review of health game research: Past, present, and future. Games Heal Res Dev Clin Appl. 2012;1(2):153–164. doi:10.1089/g4 h.2012.0011.
  • Thielman G. Rehabilitation of reaching poststroke: A randomized pilot investigation of tactile versus auditory feedback for trunk control. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2010;34(3):138–144. doi:10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181efa1e8.
  • Alankus G, Kelleher C. Reducing compensatory motions in video games for stroke rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM; 2012:2049–2058.
  • Valdés BA, Schneider AN, Van der Loos HFM. Reducing trunk compensation in stroke survivors: A randomized crossover trial comparing visual vs. force feedback modalities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 98(10): 1932–1940. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.034.
  • Levin MF. Trunk restraint: Physical intervention for improvement of upper-limb motor impairment and function. In: Söderback I, ed. International Handbook of Occupational Therapy Interventions. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2009:295–300. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-75424-6.
  • Michaelsen SM, Luta A, Roby-Brami A, Levin MF. Effect of trunk restraint on the recovery of reaching movements in hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 2001;32(8):1875–1883. doi:10.1161/01.STR.32.8.1875.
  • Schmidt R. Motor learning principles for physical therapy. In: Contemp Manag Mot Control Probl: Proc II STEP Conf. APTA; 1991: 49–64. http://hpresearch.com/files/papers/therapy/Schmidt_IISTEP_1990.pdf.
  • Molier BI, Van Asseldonk EHF, Hermens HJ, Jannink MJA. Nature, timing, frequency and type of augmented feedback; does it influence motor relearning of the hemiparetic arm after stroke? A systematic review Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(22):1799–1809. doi:10.3109/09638281003734359.
  • Sigrist R, Rauter G, Riener R, Wolf P. Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013;20(1):21–53. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0333-8.
  • Primack BA, Carroll MV, McNamara M, et al. Role of video games in improving health-related outcomes: A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(6):630–638. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.023.
  • Lohse KR, Hilderman CGE, Cheung KL, Tatla S, Van der Loos HFM. Virtual reality therapy for adults post-stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis exploring virtual environments and commercial games in therapy. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e93318. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093318.
  • Michaelsen SM, Levin MF. Short-term effects of practice with trunk restraint on reaching movements in patients with chronic stroke: A controlled trial. Stroke. 2004;35(8):1914–1919. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000132569.33572.75.
  • Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13–31. doi:10.1038/35081184.
  • Levin M, Desrosiers J, Beauchemin D, Bergeron N, Rochette A. Development and validation of a scale for rating motor compensations used for reaching in patients with hemiparesis: The reaching performance scale. Phys Ther. 2004;84(1):8–22. http://physther.org/content/84/1/8.short. Accessed July 11, 2013.
  • Subramanian SK, Yamanaka J, Chilingaryan G, Levin MF. Validity of movement pattern kinematics as measures of arm motor impairment poststroke. Stroke. 2010;41:2303–2308. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.593368.
  • Michaelsen SM, Dannenbaum R, Levin MF. Task-specific training with trunk restraint on arm recovery in stroke: Randomized control trial. Stroke. 2006;37(1):186–192. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000196940.20446.c9.
  • Burke JW, McNeill MDJ, Charles DK, Morrow PJ, Crosbie JH, McDonough SM. Optimising engagement for stroke rehabilitation using serious games. Vis Comput. 2009;25(12):1085–1099. doi:10.1007/s00371-009-0387-4.
  • Brooke J. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. In: Patrick W. Jordan, B. Thomas, Ian Lyall McClelland, Bernard Weerdmeester, eds. Usability Evaluation in Industry. CRC Press; 1996:189–194.
  • Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat. 1979;6(2):65–70. doi:10.2307/4615733.
  • Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1988. doi: 10.4324/9780203771587.
  • Murphy MA, Häger CK. Kinematic analysis of the upper extremity after stroke – how far have we reached and what have we grasped? Phys Ther Rev. 2015;20(3):137–155. doi:10.1179/1743288X15Y.0000000002.
  • Hodges N, Campagnaro P. Physical guidance research: Assisting principles and supporting evidence. In: Nicola J. Hodges, A. Mark Williams, eds. Skill Acquisition in Sport: Research, Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. Taylor & Francis; 2012: 150–169.
  • Schmidt R. Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In: Tutorials in Motor Neuroscience. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht; 1991:59–75. doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-3626-6.10.1007/978-94-011-3626-6
  • Lohse K, Shirzad N, Verster A, Hodges N, Van der Loos HFM. Video games and rehabilitation: Using design principles to enhance engagement in physical therapy. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2013;37(4):166–175. doi:10.1097/NPT.0000000000000017.
  • Burke JW, McNeill M, Charles D, Morrow P, Crosbie J, McDonough S. Serious games for upper limb rehabilitation following stroke. In 2009 Conference in Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications. IEEE; 2009:103–110. doi:10.1109/VS-GAMES.2009.17.
  • Huang H, Wolf SL, He J. Recent developments in biofeedback for neuromotor rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2006;3(11):1–12. doi:10.1186/1743-0003-3-11.
  • Lang CE, Macdonald JR, Reisman DS, et al. Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(10):1692–1698. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.04.005.
  • Wei Y, Bajaj P, Scheidt R, Patton J. Visual Error Augmentation for Enhancing Motor Learning and Rehabilitative Relearning. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. Chicago; 2005:505–510.
  • Hung C-T, Croft EA, Van der Loos HFM. A wearable vibrotactile device for upper-limb bilateral motion training in stroke rehabilitation: A case study. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS.; 2015:3480–3483. doi:10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319142.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.