Predicting shoulder function after constraint-induced movement therapy: a retrospective cohort study

References

• George SH, Rafiei MH, Borstad A, Adeli H, Gauthier LV. Gross motor ability predicts response to upper extremity rehabilitation in chronic stroke. Behav Brain Res. 2017;333(May):314–322. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2017.07.002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakayama H, Jørgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(4):394–398. doi:10.1016/0003-9993(94)90161-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doussoulin A, Arancibia M, Saiz J, Silva A, Luengo M. Recovering functional independence after a stroke through modified constraint induced therapy. NeuroRehabilitation. January 2017;40:243–249. doi:10.3233/NRE-161409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang CE, Beebe JA. Relating movement control at 9 upper extremity segments to loss of hand function in people with chronic hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21(3):279–291. doi:10.1177/1545968306296964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gates DH, Walters LS, Cowley J, Wilken JM, Resnik L. Range of motion requirements for upper-limb activities of daily living. Am J Occup Ther. 2015;70(1):7001350010p1–7001350010p10. doi:10.5014/ajot.2016.015487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim K, Song WK, Lee J, et al. Kinematic analysis of upper extremity movement during drinking in hemiplegic subjects. Clin Biomech. 2014;29(3):248–256. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.12.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Veerbeek JM, van Wegen EEH, Wolf SL. Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(2):224–234. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70160-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris DM, Taub E, Mark VW. Constraint-induced movement therapy: Characterizing the intervention protocol. Eura Medicophys. 2006;42:257–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy: The EXCITE randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:33–40. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70294-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. The Excite trial: Retention of improved upper extremity function among stroke survivors receiving CI Movement therapy. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(1):33–40. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70294-6.The.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Van der Grond JV, Prevo AJH. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: Impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34(9):2181–2186. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000087172.16305.CD.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coupar F, Pollock A, Rowe P, Weir C, Langhorne P. Predictors of upper limb recovery after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26(4):291–313. doi:10.1177/0269215511420305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinear CM, Byblow WD, Ward SH. An update on predicting motor recovery after stroke. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2014;57(8):489–498. doi:10.1016/j.rehab.2014.08.006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen B. Predicting improvement in the upper paretic limb after stroke: A longitudinal prospective study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25(5–6):453–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin K-C, Huang Y-H, Hsieh Y-W, Wu C-Y. Potential predictors of motor and functional outcomes after distributed constraint-induced therapy for patients with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23(4):336–342. doi:10.1177/1545968308321773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CONSORT Group. CONSORT statement 2010 flow diagram. CONSORT-Statement. 2010:1. doi:10.1002/adsc.201100270.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Morris D. Effect of constraint-induced movement. J Am Med Assoc. 2006;296(17):2095–2104. doi:10.1001/jama.296.17.2095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen HF, Wu CY, Lin KC, Chen HC, Chen CP-C, Chen CK.. Rasch validation of the streamlined wolf motor function test in people with chronic stroke and subacute stroke. Phys Ther. 2012;92(8):1017–1026. doi:10.2522/ptj.20110175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:1635–1639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards DF, Lang CE, Wagner JM, Birkenmeier R, Dromerick AW. An evaluation of the wolf motor function test in motor trials early after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(4):660–668. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.10.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Estes E, Lonergan T, Merchant R, Richardson N. The EXCITE trial: Analysis of “noncompleted” wolf motor function test items. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26(2):178–187. doi:10.1177/1545968311426437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Morris DM, Crago J, et al. Wolf motor function test (WMFT) manual. UAB CI Ther Res Gr. 2011:1–31. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.536763.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Kwakkel G, Bayley M, McDonnell MN. Best practice for arm recovery post stroke: An international application. Physiother (United Kingdom). 2016;102(1):1–4. doi:10.1016/j.physio.2015.08.007.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhti KKAKA, Mottet D, Schweighofer N, Froger J, Laffont I. Proximal arm non-use when reaching after a stroke. Neurosci Lett. 2017;657:91–96. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2017.07.055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kordelaar J, van Wegen EEH, Kwakkel G. Unraveling the interaction between pathological upper limb synergies and compensatory trunk movements during reach-to-grasp after stroke: A cross-sectional study. Exp brain Res. 2012;221(3):251–262. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3169-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roby-Brami A, Feydy A, Combeaud M, Biryukova EV, Bussel B, Levin MF. Motor compensation and recovery for reaching in stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand. 2003;107(5):369–381. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0404.2003.00021.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin MF, Liebermann DG, Parmet Y, Berman S. Compensatory versus noncompensatory shoulder movements used for reaching in stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;30:635–646. doi:10.1177/1545968315613863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snickars J, Persson HC, Sunnerhagen KS. Early clinical predictors of motor function in the upper extremity one month post-stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2017;49(3):216–222. doi:10.2340/16501977-2205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin K, Huang Y, Hsieh Y, WEu C. Potential predictors of motor and functional outcomes after dis- tributed constraint-induced therapy for patients with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Rep. 2008;23:336–342. doi:10.1177/1545968308321773.
   Google Scholar
• Levin MF, Liebermann DG, Parmet Y, Berman S. Compensatory versus noncompensatory shoulder movements used for reaching in stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016;30:635–646. doi:10.1177/1545968315613863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson JVG, Roby-Brami A. The trunk as a part of the kinematic chain for reaching movements in healthy subjects and hemiparetic patients. Brain Res. 2011;1382:137–146. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.01.043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitago T, Liang J, Huang VS, et al. Improvement after constraint-induced movement therapy: Recovery of normal motor control or task-specific compensation? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27(2):99–109. doi:10.1177/1545968312452631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock A, Baer G, Campbell P, et al. Physical rehabilitation approaches for recovery of function, balance and walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;4:447. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001920.pub3#sthash.kEpPcclr.dpuf.
   Google Scholar
• Alt Murphy M, Resteghini C, Feys P, Lamers I. An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke. BMC Neurol. 2015;15(1):29. doi:10.1186/s12883-015-0292-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL. What do motor “recovery” and “compensation” mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;23(4):313–319. doi:10.1177/1545968308328727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pain LM, Baker R, Richardson D, Agur AMR. Effect of trunk-restraint training on function and compensatory trunk, shoulder and elbow patterns during post-stroke reach: A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(7):553–562. doi:10.3109/09638288.2014.932450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy J-S, Moffet H, McFadyen BJ, Macdermid JC. The kinematics of upper extremity reaching: A reliability study on people with and without shoulder impingement syndrome. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2010;2:8. doi:10.1186/1758-2555-2-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woodbury M, Velozo C, Thompson P, et al. Measurement structure of the wolf motor function test: Implications for motor control theory. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(9):791–801. doi:10.1177/1545968310370749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massie C, Malcolm MP, Greene D, Thaut M. The effects of constraint-induced therapy on kinematic outcomes and compensatory movement patterns: An exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(4):571–579. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.09.574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang CE, Wagner JM, Edwards DF, Sahrmann SA, Dromerick AW. Recovery of grasp versus reach in people with hemiparesis poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006;20(4):444–454. doi:10.1177/1545968306289299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar