Reliability of remote evaluation for the Fugl–Meyer assessment and the action research arm test in hemiparetic patients after stroke

References

• Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Krishnamurthi R, et al. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2014;383:245–254.10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61953-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016;47:e98–e169. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers MP, Murphy SL, Krellman J. Evidence-based practice for rehabilitation professionals: Concepts and controversies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(8 Suppl):S164–176. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.12.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Blinding in randomised trials: Hiding who got what. Lancet. 2002;359:696–700.10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07816-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfort G, Haas M, Evans R, Kawchuk G, Dagenais S. Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with spinal manipulation and mobilization. Spine J. 2008;8:213–225. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med. 2010;8:18. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosner AL. Evidence-based medicine: Revisiting the pyramid of priorities. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2012;16:42–49. doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2011.05.003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boutron I, Tubach F, Giraudeau B, Ravaud P. Blinding was judged more difficult to achieve and maintain in nonpharmacologic than pharmacologic trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:543–550.10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutron I, Guittet L, Estellat C, Moher D, Hróbjartsson A, Ravaud P. Reporting methods of blinding in randomized trials assessing nonpharmacological treatments. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e61.10.1371/journal.pmed.0040061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, Johnson G. ARM-arm rehabilitation measurement: Manual for performance and scoring of the Fugl-Meyer test (arm section), action research arm test, and the box-and-block test. Baden-Baden: Deutscher Wissenschafts-Verlag; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Baker K, Cano SJ, Playford ED. Outcome measurement in stroke: A scale selection strategy. Stroke. 2011;42:1787–1794. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.608505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med. 2002;21:1331–1335.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther. 1983;63:1606–1610.10.1093/ptj/63.10.1606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford J, Moreland J, Swanson LR, Stratford PW, Gowland C. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. Phys Ther. 1993;73:447–454.10.1093/ptj/73.7.447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, Kim IH, di Bella P, Johnson G. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer test, action research arm test and box and block test: A multicentre study. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:404–411.10.1191/0269215505cr832oa
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin JH, Hsu MJ, Sheu CF, et al. Psychometric comparisons of 4 measures for assessing upper-extremity function in people with stroke. Phys Ther. 2009;89:840–850. doi:10.2522/ptj.20080285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan kJ, Tilson JK, Cen SY, et al. Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor function after stroke: Standardized training procedure for clinical practice and clinical trials. Stroke. 2011;42:427–432. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.592766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelsen SM, Rocha AS, Knabben RJ, Rodrigues LP, Fernandes CG. Translation, adaptation and inter-rater reliability of the administration manual for the Fugl-Meyer assessment. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011;15:80–88.10.1590/S1413-35552011000100013
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• See J, Dodakian L, Chou C, et al. A standardized approach to the Fugl-Meyer assessment and its implications for clinical trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27:732–741. doi:10.1177/1545968313491000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundquist CB, Maribo T. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity: Reliability, responsiveness and validity of the Danish version. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39:934–939. doi:10.3109/09638288.2016.1163422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981;4:483–492.10.1097/00004356-198112000-00001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh CL, Hsueh IP, Chiang FM, Lin PH. Inter-rater reliability and validity of the action research arm test in stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1998;27:107–113.10.1093/ageing/27.2.107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Lee JH, De Groot V, Beckerman H, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: A practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:14–19.10.1053/apmr.2001.18668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsueh IP, Lee MM, Hsieh CL. The action research arm test: Is it necessary for patients being tested to sit at a standardized table? Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:382–388.10.1191/0269215502cr509oa
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yozbatiran N, Der-Yeghiaian L, Cramer SC. A standardized approach to performing the action research arm test. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:78–90.10.1177/1545968307305353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijland R, van Wegen E, Verbunt J, van Wijk R, van Kordelaar J, Kwakkel G. A comparison of two validated tests for upper limb function after stroke: The Wolf motor function test and the action research arm test. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42:694–696. doi:10.2340/16501977-0560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordin Å, Alt Murphy M, Danielsson A. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability at the item level of the action research arm test for patients with stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46:738–745. doi:10.2340/16501977-1831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushnell C, Bettger JP, Cockroft KM, et al. Chronic stroke outcome measures for motor function intervention trials: Expert panel recommendations. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015;8(6 Suppl 3):S163–169. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse T, Douglas J, Lentin P, Carey L. Measuring participation after stroke: A review of frequently used tools. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:177–192. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2012.09.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell LA, Tyson SF. Clinical reality of measuring upper-limb ability in neurologic conditions: A systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:221–228. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.09.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashford S, Slade M, Malaprade F, Turner-Stokes L. Evaluation of functional outcome measures for the hemiparetic upper limb: A systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:787–795. doi:10.2340/16501977-0276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar