References
- Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135:e229–e445.
- Lackland DT, Roccella EJ, Deutsch AF, et al. Factors influencing the decline in stroke mortality: a statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45(1):315–353. doi:10.1161/01.str.0000437068.30550.cf
- Meyer S, Karttunen AH, Feys H, Verheyden G. How do somatosensory deficits in the arm and hand relate to upper limb impairment, activity, and participation problems after stroke? A systematic review. Phys Ther. 2014;94:1220–1231. doi:10.2522/ptj.20130271.
- Wyller TB, Sveen U, Sodring KM, Pettersen AM, Bautz-Holter E. Subjective well-being one year after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 1997;11:139–145. doi:10.1177/026921559701100207.
- Whyte WFE. Participatory Action Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1991.
- Doyle SD, Bennett S, Dudgeon B. Upper limb post-stroke sensory impairments: the survivor’s experience. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(12):993–1000. doi:10.3109/09638288.2013.825649.
- Barker RN, Gill TJ, SG B. Factors contributing to upper limb recovery after stroke: A survey of stroke survivors in Queensland Australia. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(13):981–989. doi:10.1080/09638280500243570.
- Poltawski L, Allison R, Briscoe S, et al. Assessing the impact of upper limb disability following stroke: a qualitative enquiry using internet-based personal accounts of stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;38(10):945–951. doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1068383.
- van Delden AEQ, Peper CE, Beek PJ, Kwakkel G. Match and mismatch between objective and subjective improvements in upper limb function after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(23):1961–1967. doi:10.3109/09638288.2013.768303.
- White GW. Consumer participation in disability research: the golden rule as a guide for ethical practice. Rehabil Psychol. 2002;4(7):438–446. doi:10.1037/0090-5550.47.4.438.
- Lin KC, Fu T, Wu CY, Hsieh YW, Chen CL, Lee PC. Psychometric comparisons of the stroke impact scale 3.0 and stroke-specific quality of life scale. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:435–443. doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9597-5.
- Akoglu H. User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turk J Emerg Med. 2018;18(3):91–93. doi:10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001.
- Hughes A-M, Burridge J, Freeman CT, et al. Stroke participants’ perceptions of robotic and electrical stimulation therapy: a new approach. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;6(2):130–138. doi:10.3109/17483107.2010.509882.
- Meadmore KL, Hughes A-M, Freeman CT, Benson V, JH B. Participant feedback in the evaluation of novel stroke rehabilitation technologies. J Rehabil Rob. 2013;1:82–92.
- Lin KC, Fu T, Wu CY, et al. Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the stroke impact scale in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(5):486–492. doi:10.1177/1545968309356295.
- Vellone E, Savini S, Fida R, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the stroke impact scale 3.0. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015;30(3):229–241. doi:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000145.
- Luker J, Lynch L, Bernhardsson S, Bennett L, Bernhardt J. Stroke survivors’ experiences of physical rehabilitation: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:1698–1708. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.017.
- Reker DM, Duncan PW, Horner RD, et al. Postacute stroke guideline compliance is associated with greater patient satisfaction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(6):750–756.
- Sluijs EM, Kok GJ, van der Zee J. Correlates of exercise compliance in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 1993;73(11):771–782. doi:10.1093/ptj/73.11.771.
- Huang Y, Wu C, Hsieh Y, Lin K. Predictors of change in quality of life after distributed constraint-induced therapy in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(6):559–566. doi:10.1177/1545968309358074.