Upper limb use differs among people with varied upper limb impairment levels early post-stroke: a single-site, cross-sectional, observational study

References

• Kong KH, Lee J. Temporal recovery and predictors of upper limb dexterity in the first year of stroke: a prospective study of patients admitted to a rehabilitation centre. NeuroRehabil. 2013;32:345–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJ. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34(9):2181–2186. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000087172.16305.CD.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Horner RD, Landsman PB, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke. 1994;25(6):1181–1188. doi:10.1161/01.STR.25.6.1181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortes JC, Goldsmith J, Harran MD, et al. A short and distinct time window for recovery of arm motor control early after stroke revealed with a global measure of trajectory kinematics. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31(6):552–560. doi:10.1177/1545968317697034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krakauer JW, Carmichael ST, Corbett D, Wittenberg GF. Getting neurorehabilitation right: what can be learned from animal models? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26(8):923–931. doi:10.1177/1545968312440745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasell R, Bitensky J, Salter K, Bayona NA. The role of timing and intensity of rehabilitation therapies. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2005;12(3):46–57. doi:10.1310/ETDP-6DR4-D617-VMVF.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stinear C, Ackerley S, Byblow W. Rehabilitation is initiated early after stroke, but most motor rehabilitation trials are not: a systematic review. Stroke. 2013;44(7):2039–2045. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.000968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreisel SH, Bazner H, Hennerici MG. Pathophysiology of stroke rehabilitation- temporal aspects of neurofunctional recovery. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;21(1–2):6–17. doi:10.1159/000089588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward KS, Eng JJ, Boyd LA, Lakhani B, Bernhardt J, Lang CE. Exploring the role of accelerometers in the measurement of real world upper-limb use after stroke. Brain Impairment. 2015;17(01):16–33. doi:10.1017/BrImp.2015.21.
   Google Scholar
• Urbin MA, Bailey RR, Lang CE. Validity of body-worn sensor acceleration metrics to index upper extremity function in hemiparetic stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2015;39(2):111–118. doi:10.1097/NPT.0000000000000085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Giuliani C, Winstein C, Zeringue A, Hobbs L, Wolf SL. Validity of accelerometry for monitoring real-world arm activity in patients with subacute stroke: evidence from the extremity constraint-induced therapy evaluation trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(10):1340–1345. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.06.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Pas SC, Verbunt JA, Breukelaar DE, van Woerden R, Seelen HA. Assessment of arm activity using triaxial accelerometry in patients with a stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(9):1437–1442. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.02.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen HL, Lin KC, Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Liing RJ, Chen CL. A study of predictive validity, responsivenss, and minimal clinically important difference of arm accelerometer in real-world activity of patients with chronic stroke. Clin Rehabil. Jun 2017;1:269215517712042. doi:10.1177/0269215517712042.
   Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Foo W, Olmstead H, Lopez K, Holand A, Simms L. Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: an objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(7):1498–1501. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.01.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin LF, Hayward KS, Soh AJA, et al. An accelerometry and observational study to quantify upper limb use after stroke during inpatient rehabilitation. Physiother Res Int. 2019;24(4):e1784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang CE, Wagner JM, Edwards DF, Dromerick AW. Upper extremity use in people with hemiparesis in the first few weeks after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007;31(2):56–63. doi:10.1097/NPT.0b013e31806748bd.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rand D, Eng JJ. Disparity between functional recovery and daily use of the upper and lower extremities during subacute stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26(1):76–84. doi:10.1177/1545968311408918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrane G, Emaus N, Askim T, Anke A. Arm use in patients with subacute stroke monitored by accelerometry: association with motor impairment and influence on self-dependence. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(4):299–304. doi:10.2340/16501977-0676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebruers N, Truijen S, Engelborghs S, De Deyn PP. Predictive value of upper-limb accelerometry in acute stroke with hemiparesis. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(8):1099–1106. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2012.09.0166.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Narai E, Hagino H, Komatsu T, Togo F. Accelerometer-based monitoring of upper limb movement in older adults with acute and subacute stroke. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2016;39(4):111–171. doi:10.1519/JPT.0000000000000067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim S, Kim H, Jung J. Comparison of upper extremity motor recovery of stroke patients with actual physical activity in their daily lives measured with accelerometers. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26:1009–1011. doi:10.1589/jpts.26.1009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Franck J, Smeets R, Seelen H. Changes in actual arm-hand use in stroke patients during and after clinical rehabilitation involving a well-defined arm-hand rehabilitation program: a prospective cohort study. Plos One. 2019;14(4):e0214651. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0214651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt J, Chan J, Nicola I, Collier J. Little therapy, little physical activity: rehabilitation within the first 14 days of organized stroke unit care. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(1):43–48. doi:10.2340/16501977-0013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453–1457. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladstone D, Danells C, Black S. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke- a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16(3):232–240. doi:10.1177/154596802401105171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, Kim I, Di Bella P, Johnson G. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the FugI-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test- a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(4):404–411. doi:10.1191/0269215505cr832oa.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan KJ, Tilson JK, Cen SY, et al. Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor function after stroke: standardized training procedure for clinical practice and clinical trials. Stroke. 2011;42(2):427–432. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.592766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodbury ML, Velozo CA, Richards LG, Duncan PW. Rasch analysis staging methodology to classify upper extremity movement impairment after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(8):1527–1533. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt J, Chitravas N, Meslo IL, Thrift AG, Indredavik B. Not all stroke units are the same: a comparison of physical activity patterns in Melbourne, Australia, and Trondheim, Norway. Stroke. 2008;39(7):2059–2065. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.507160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart T, Swartz A, Cashin S, Strath S. How many days of monitoring predict physical activity and sedentary behaviour in older adults? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Jun;16(8):62. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-8-62.
   Google Scholar
• Rangaraju S, Frankel M, Jovin TG. Prognostic value of the 24-hour neurological examination in anterior circulation ischemic stroke: a post hoc analysis of two randomized controlled stroke trials. Interv Neurol. 2016;4(3–4):120–129. doi:10.1159/000443801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiti G, Pantoni L. Use of montreal cognitive assessment in patients with stroke. Stroke. 2014;45(10):3135–3140. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.004590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beninato M, Gill-Body KM, Salles S, Stark PC, Black-Schaffer RM, Stein J. Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(1):32–39. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd D, Stewart G, Baldry J, et al. The functional independence measure: a comparative validity and reliability study. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;17(1):10–14. doi:10.3109/09638289509166622.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln NB, Jackson JM, Adams SA. Reliability and revision of the nottingham sensory assessment for stroke patients. Physiotherapy. 1998;84(8):358–365. doi:10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61454-X.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey RR, Lang CE. Upper-limb activity in adults: referent values using accelerometry. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(9):1213–1222. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2012.12.0222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey RR, Birkenmeier RL, Lang CE. Real-world affected upper limb activity in chronic stroke: an examination of potential modifying factors. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2015;22(1):26–33. doi:10.1179/1074935714Z.0000000040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Wolfgang H, Foo B, Varma M, Moran S, Taub E. Objective measurement of functional upper-extremity movement using accelerometer recording transformed with a threshold filter. Stroke. 2000;31:662–667. doi:10.1161/01.STR.31.3.662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbin MA, Waddell KJ, Lang CE. Acceleration metrics are responsive to change in upper extremity function of stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(5):854–861. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.11.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey RR, Klaesner JW, Lang CE. Quantifying real-world upper-limb activity in nondisabled adults and adults with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29(10):969–978. doi:10.1177/1545968315583720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey RR, Klaesner JW, Lang CE. An accelerometry-based methodology for assessment of real-world bilateral upper extremity activity. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e103135. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris JE, Eng JJ, Miller WC, Dawson AS. A self-administered Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) improves arm function during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a multi-site randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2009;40(6):2123–2128. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.544585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar