Outcomes of an interprofessional intensive comprehensive aphasia program’s first five years

References

• Babbitt EM, Heinemann AW, Semik P, Cherney L. Psychometric properties of the Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia (CCRSA): phase 2. Aphasiology. 2011;25(6–7):727–735. doi:10.1080/02687038.2010.537347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney L, Nichols C (2015). Growing a healthy intensive aphasia program incorporating LPAA. Presentation at the AphasiaAccess Conference; March 2015; Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Escher AA, Amlani AM, Viani AM, Berger S. Occupational therapy in an intensive comprehensive aphasia program: performance and satisfaction outcomes. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2018;72((3):):1–7.doi:10.5014/ajot.2018.026187.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteside JD, Pak Hin KA (2014). Design principles and outcomes of “Aphasia House” a university intensive comprehensive aphasia program (ICAP). 44th Clinical Aphasiology Conference; 2014; St. Simons, GA. http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/2577/
   Google Scholar
• Worrall L, Sherratt S, Rogers P, et al. What people with aphasia want: their goals according to the ICF. Aphasiology. 2011;25(3):309–322. doi:10.1080/02687038.2010.508530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney L, Patterson JP, Raymer A, Frymark T, Schooling T. Evidence-based systematic review: effects of intensity of treatment and constraint-induced language therapy for individuals with stroke-induced aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research. 2008;51(5):1282–1299.doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0206).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dignam JK, Rodriguez AD, Copland DA. Evidence for intensive aphasia therapy: consideration of theories from neuroscience and cognitive psychology. PM&R, [s. l.]. 2015;8(3):254–267. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose ML, Cherney LR, Worrall LE. Intensive comprehensive aphasia programs: an international survey of practice. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013;20(5):379–387. doi:10.1310/tsr2005-379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trebilcock M, Worrall L, Ryan B, et al. Increasing the intensity and comprehensiveness of aphasia services: identification of key factors influencing implementation across six countries. Aphasiology. 2019;33(7):865–887. doi:10.1080/02687038.2019.1602860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babbitt EM, Worrall L, Cherney L. Who benefits from an intensive comprehensive aphasia program? Topics Lang Disorder. 2016;36(2):168–184. doi:10.1097/TLD.0000000000000089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover EL, Caplan DN, Waters GS, Carney A. Communication and quality of life outcomes from an interprofessional intensive, comprehensive, aphasia program (ICAP), (2017). Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017;24(2):82–90. doi:10.1080/10749357.2016.1207147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas M, Pittmann R, Pennington S, et al. S-IHP’s CAP: Interprofessional Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Program for Life Participation: Lessons Learned across Three Years. Boston, Ma: Seminar at the American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA) annual convention; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Persad C, Wozniak L, Kostopoulos E. Retrospective Analysis of Outcomes from Two Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programs. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013;20(5):388–397. doi:10.1310/tsr2005-388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winans-Mitrik RL, Hula WD, Dickey MW, Schumacher JG, Swoyer B, Doyle PJ. Description of an intensive residential aphasia treatment program: rationale, clinical processes and outcomes. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology. 2014;23(2):S330–S342.doi:10.1044/2014_AJSLP-13-0102.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer N, Jordan N, Cherney LR. Implementation cost analysis of an intensive comprehensive aphasia program. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, [s. l.] 2020;2020. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.398.
   Google Scholar
• Kertesz A. Western Aphasia Battery- Revised (WAB-R). San Antonio, TX: Pearson; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Baines KA, Heeringa HM, Martin AW. Assessment of Language-Related Functional Activities (ALFA). Austin, TX: Pro-ed; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Chapey R, Duchan J, Elman R, et al. Life participation approach to aphasia: a statement of values for the future. In: Chapey R, ed. Language Intervention Strategies in Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Communication Disorders. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Gaeta L, Brydges CR. An examination of effect sizes and statistical power in speech, language, and hearing research. J Speech, Lang, Hearing Res. 2020;63(5):1572–1580. doi:10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore N, Dwyer M, Kiran S. Benchmarks of significant change after aphasia rehabilitation. Archives of Phys. Med. & Rehab. 2019;100(6):1131–1139.e87.doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2018.08.177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks N. Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test (CLQT). San Antonio, TX: Pearson; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan A. Revealing the competence of aphasic adults through conversation: a challenge to health professionals. Top Stroke Rehabil. 1995;2(1):15–28. doi:10.1080/10749357.1995.11754051.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tucker FM, Edwards DF, Mathews LK, Baum CM, Connor LT. Modifying health outcome measures for people with aphasia. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2012;66(1):42–50. doi:10.5014/ajot.2012.001255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO); 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Lomas J, Pickard L, Bester S, Elbard H, Finlayson A, Zoghaib C. The Communicative Effectiveness Index: development and psychometric evaluation of a functional communication measure for adult aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 1989;54(1):113–124.doi:10.1044/jshd.5401.113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Babbitt E, Worrall L, Cherney L. Structure, processes, and retrospective outcomes from an intensive comprehensive aphasia program. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;24. doi:10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum CA, Edwards D. Activity Card Sort. 2nd. ed. Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Jacobs Laster L. The stroke impact scale version 2.0: evaluation of reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30(10):2131–2140. doi:10.1161/01.STR.30.10.2131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Carswell A, Baptiste S, McColl MA, Polatajko H, Pollock N. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). 5th. Ottowa, Ontario, Canada: CAOT Publications ACE; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Shelburne CD, Stewart AL. The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(6):705–714. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(91)90150-B.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hula WD, Doyle PJ, Stone CA, et al. The Aphasia Communication Outcome Measure (ACOM): dimensionality, Item Bank Calibration, and Initial Validation. J Speech, Lang, Hearing Res. 2015;58(3):906–919. doi:10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern RA, Arruda JE, Hooper CR, Wolfner GD, Morey CE. Visual analogue mood scales to measure internal mood state in neurologically impaired patients: description and initial validity evidence. Aphasiology. 1997;11(1):59–71. doi:10.1080/02687039708248455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan A, Black S, Duchan JF, Simmons-Mackie N, Square P. Training volunteers as conversation partners using “Supported Conversation for Adults with Aphasia” (SCA): a controlled trial. J. of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2001;44(3):624–638.doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2001/051).
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas ML, Burch K, Mitchell JR, Fox AB, Baum CM, Connor LT. Self-perception of physical function contributes to participation in cognitively- and physically- demanding activities after stroke. Front Neurol. 2020;11. doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.00474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar