Early mobilization in acute stroke phase: a systematic review

References

• Bonita R. Epidemiology of stroke. Lancet. Feb 8, 1992;339(8789):342–344. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(92)91658-U.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, et al.; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. Jul 2013;44(7):2064–2089. doi:10.1161/STR.0b013e318296aeca.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe CD. The impact of stroke. Br Med Bull. 2000;56(2):275–286. doi:10.1258/0007142001903120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, et al. American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2019 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. Mar 5, 2019;139(10):e56–e528. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billinger SA, Arena R, Bernhardt J, et al.; American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Clinical Cardiology. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. Aug 2014;45(8):2532–2553. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donkor ES. Stroke in the 21st century: a snapshot of the burden, epidemiology, and quality of life. Stroke Res Treat. Nov 27, 2018;2018:3238165. doi:10.1155/2018/3238165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ. Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet. May 27, 2006;367(9524):1747–1757. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68770-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotufo PA, Goulart AC, Passos VMA, et al. Cerebrovascular disease in Brazil from 1990 to 2015: global burden of disease 2015. Rev Bras Epidemiol. May 2017;20(Suppl01):129–141. doi:10.1590/1980-5497201700050011.
   Google Scholar
• Utida KAM, Batiston AP, Sousa LA. Level of functional independence of patients after stroke assisted by a multidisciplinary team in a rehabilitation unit. Acta Fisiátrica. Sep 8, 2016;23(3):107–112. doi:10.5935/0104-7795.20160021.
   Google Scholar
• Wood JP, Connelly DM, Maly MR. ‘Getting back to real living’: a qualitative study of the process of community reintegration after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24(11):1045–1056. doi:10.1177/0269215510375901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves MJ, Parker C, Fonarow GC, Smith EE, Schwamm LH. Development of stroke performance measures: definitions, methods, and current measures. Stroke. 2010;41(7):1573–1578. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.577171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamford J, Dennis M, Sandercock P, Burn J, Warlow C. The frequency, causes and timing of death within 30 days of a first stroke: the Oxfordshire community stroke project. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Oct 1990;53(10):824–829. doi:10.1136/jnnp.53.10.824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu T, Yu X, Ou S, Liu X, Yuan J, Chen Y. Efficacy and safety of very early mobilization in patients with acute stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. Jul 26, 2017;7(1):6550. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-06871-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, et al.; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. Jun 2016;47(6):e98–e169. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter B, Gumbinger C, Sauer T, et al.; Stroke Working Group of Baden-Wuerttemberg. Access, timing and frequency of very early stroke rehabilitation - insights from the Baden-Wuerttemberg stroke registry. BMC Neurol. Nov16, 2016;16(1):222. doi:10.1186/s12883-016-0744-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bernhardt J, Dewey H, Collier J, et al. A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT). Int J Stroke. Aug 2006;1(3):169–171. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4949.2006.00044.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Wu O, Rodgers H, Ashburn A, Bernhardt J. A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial after stroke (AVERT): a phase III, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Health Technol Assess. 2017;21(54):1–120. doi:10.3310/hta21540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt J, Dewey H, Thrift A, Collier J, Donnan G. A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial for stroke (AVERT): phase II safety and feasibility. Stroke. 2008;39(2):390–396. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.492363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock A, Baer G, Campbell P, et al. Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Apr 22, 2014;2014(4):CD001920.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(9):CD000197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. Nov27, 1993;342(8883):1317–1322. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92244-N.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;350(jan02 1):g7647. doi:10.1136/bmj.g7647.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bernhardt J, Hayward KS, Kwakkel G, et al. Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable taskforce. Int J Stroke. 2017;12(5):444–450. doi:10.1177/1747493017711816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, de Bie RA, et al. The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(12):1235–1241. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00131-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OCEBM. Levels of evidence working group. “The Oxford 2011 levels of evidence.” Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653. Accessed January 16, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• AVERT Trial Collaboration group. Efficacy and safety of very early mobilisation within 24 h of stroke onset (AVERT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. Jul 4, 2015;386(9988):46–55. Epub 2015 Apr 16. Erratum in: Lancet. 2015 Jul 4;386(9988):30.Erratum in: Lancet. 2017 May 13;389(10082):1884.PMID: 25892679. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60690-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt J, Churilov L, Ellery F, et al.; AVERT Collaboration Group. Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT). Neurology. 2016;86(23):2138–2145. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chippala P, Sharma R. Effect of very early mobilisation on functional status in patients with acute stroke: a single-blind, randomized controlled trail. Clin Rehabil. Jul 2016;30(7):669–675. doi:10.1177/0269215515596054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming TB, Bernhardt J, Lowe D, et al.; AVERT Trial Collaboration group. Early mobilization after stroke is not associated with cognitive outcome. Stroke. 2018;49(9):2147–2154. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herisson F, Godard S, Volteau C, Le Blanc E, Guillon B, Gaudron M; SEVEL study group. Early sitting in ischemic stroke patients (SEVEL): a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. Mar 29, 2016;11(3):e0149466. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poletto SR, Rebello LC, Valença MJ, et al. Early mobilization in ischemic stroke: a pilot randomized trial of safety and feasibility in a public hospital in Brazil. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. Apr 28, 2015;5(1):31–40. doi:10.1159/000381417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olavarría VV, Arima H, Anderson CS, et al. Head position and cerebral blood flow velocity in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;37(6):401–408. doi:10.1159/000362533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panayiotou B, Reid J, Fotherby M, Crome P. Orthostatic haemodynamic responses in acute stroke. Postgrad Med J. 1999;75(882):213–218. doi:10.1136/pgmj.75.882.213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conceição TMAD, Gonzáles AI, Figueiredo FCXS, Vieira DSR, Bündchen DC. Safety criteria to start early mobilization in intensive care units. Systematic review. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017;29(4):509–519.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yen HC, Chen WS, Jeng JS, Luh JJ, Lee YY, Pan GS. Standard early rehabilitation and lower limb transcutaneous nerve or neuromuscular electrical stimulation in acute stroke patients: a randomized controlled pilot study. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(8):1344–1354. doi:10.1177/0269215519841420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnan G, Middleton S, Pandian J, et al. AVERT‐DOSE (Determining Optimal early rehabilitation after StrokE): a multi‐arm covariate‐adjusted, response‐adaptive randomised controlled trial. https://researchdata.edu.au/avert-dose-determining-controlled-trial/1319065 ( Accessed December 6, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Wardlaw JM, Murray V, Berge E, del Zoppo GJ. Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 29, 2014;2014(7):CD000213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldstein LB, Samsa GP. Reliability of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Extension to non-neurologists in the context of a clinical trial. Stroke. 1997;28(2):307–310. doi:10.1161/01.STR.28.2.307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwah LK, Diong J. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). J Physiother. 2014;60(1):61. doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2013.12.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broderick JP, Adeoye O, Elm J. Evolution of the modified Rankin Scale and its use in future stroke trials. Stroke. Jul 2017;48(7):2007–2012. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewilde S, Annemans L, Peeters A, et al. Modified Rankin Scale as a determinant of direct medical costs after stroke. Int J Stroke. 2017;12(4):392–400. doi:10.1177/1747493017691984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn TJ, Taylor-Rowan M, Coyte A, et al. Pre-Stroke modified Rankin Scale: evaluation of validity, prognostic accuracy, and association with treatment. Front Neurol. Jun 2017;13(8):275. doi:10.3389/fneur.2017.00275.
   Google Scholar
• Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(8):703–709. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(89)90065-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cincura C, Pontes-Neto OM, Neville IS, et al. Validation of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index in Brazil: the role of cultural adaptation and structured interviewing. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27(2):119–122. doi:10.1159/000177918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation: Global Health and Ageing. 2011. Geneva. [http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/global_health.pdf] Accessed January 16, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Geyh S, Cieza A, Schouten J, et al. ICF core sets for stroke. J Rehabil Med. Jul 2004;36(44 Suppl):135–141. doi:10.1080/16501960410016776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar