The brief executive language screen: sensitivity and specificity in acute to early sub-acute stroke

References

• Barker-Collo S, Feigin V. The impact of neuropsychological deficits on functional stroke outcomes. Neuropsychological Review. 2006;16(2):53–64. doi:10.1007/s11065-006-9007-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackett ML, Anderson CS. Health outcomes 1 year after subarachnoid hemorrhage: an international population-based study. Neurology. 2000;55(5):658–662. doi:10.1212/WNL.55.5.658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel M, Miguel ST, Naegele B, Gonnet N, Jaillard A. Cognitive determinants of social functioning after a first ever mild to moderate stroke at vocational age. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Res. 2009;80(8):876–880. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2008.169672.
   Google Scholar
• Hochstenbach JB, Anderson PG, van Limbeek J, Mulder TT. Is there a relation between neuropsychologic variables and quality of life after stroke?. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(10):1360–1366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nys GMS, van Zandvoort MJE, de Kort PLM, Jansen BP, De Haan EH, Kappelle L. Cognitive disorders in acute stroke: prevalence and clinical determinants. Cerebrovascular Dis. 2007;23(5–6):408–416. doi:10.1159/000101464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagle J, Farner L, Flekkøy K, et al. Early post-stroke cognition in stroke rehabilitation patients predicts functional outcome at 13 months. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2011;31(5):379–387. doi:10.1159/000328970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warlow CP. Epidemiology of stroke. Lancet. 1998;352:S1–S4. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(98)90086-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chahal N, Barker-Collo S, Feigin V. Cognitive and functional outcomes of 5- year subarachnoid haemorrhage survivors: comparison to matched healthy controls. Neuroepidemiology. 2011;37(1):31–38. doi:10.1159/000328647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law B, Young B, Pinsker D, Robinson A. Propositional speech in unselected stroke: the effect of genre and external support. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation: An International Journal. 2015;25(3):374–401. doi:10.1080/09602011.2014.937443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesniak M, Bak T, Czepiel W, Seniow J, Czlonkowska A. Frequency and prognostic value of cognitive disorders in stroke patients. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2008;26(4):356–363. doi:10.1159/000162262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nys GMS, van Zandvoort MJE, de Kort PLM, et al. The prognostic value of domain-specific cognitive abilities in acute first-ever stroke. Neurology. 2005a;64(5):821–827. doi:10.1212/01.WNL.0000152984.28420.5A.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson IH, Ridgeway V, Greenfield E, Parr A. Motor recovery after stroke depends on intact sustained attention: a 2-year follow-up study. Neuropsychology. 1997;11(2):290–295. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.11.2.290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson G, Shi L, Nott Z, Ceslis A. A brief executive language screen for frontal aphasia. Brain Sci. 2021a;11(3):1–15. doi:10.3390/brainsci11030353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benaim C, Wauquiez G, Pérennou D, et al. Cognitive assessment scale for stroke patients (CASP): a multicentric validation study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2022;65(3):101594.doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks N. Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test: CLQT. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Demeyere N, Riddoch MJ, Slavkova ED, Bickerton WL, Humphreys GW. The Oxford cognitive screen (OCS): validation of a stroke-specific short cognitive screening tool. Psychol Assess. 2015;27(3):883. doi:10.1037/pas0000082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demeyere N, Haupt M, Webb SS, et al. Introducing the tablet-based Oxford cognitive screen-plus (OCS-Plus) as an assessment tool for subtle cognitive impairments. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):8000. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-87287-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson SM, Eriksson DK, Schneck SM, Lucanie JM. Correction: a quick aphasia battery for efficient, reliable, and multidimensional assessment of language function. PloS One. 2018;13(6):e0199469–e0199469. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0199469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson SM, Entrup JL, Schneck SM, et al. Recovery from aphasia in the first year after stroke. Brain. 2023;146(3):1021–1039. doi:10.1093/brain/awac129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz A. Western aphasia battery–revised. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–699. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–198. doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan E, Khan S, Oliver R, Gill SK, Werring DJ, Cipolotti L. Underestimation of cognitive impairments by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in an acute stroke unit population. J Neurol Sci. 2014;343(1–2):176–179. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2014.05.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan E, Altendorff S, Healy C, Werring DJ, Cipolotti L. The test accuracy of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) by stroke lateralisation. J Neurol Sci. 2017;373:100–104. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2016.12.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn DJ, Bafadhel L, Randall M, Harkness KA. Cognitive screening in the acute stroke setting. Age Ageing. 2013;42(1):113–116.doi:10.1093/ageing/afs116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohjasvaara T, Leskelä M, Vataja R, et al. Post‐stroke depression, executive dysfunction and functional outcome. Eur J Neurol. 2002;9(3):269–275. doi:10.1046/j.1468-1331.2002.00396.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker MS, Nelson NL, Robinson G. Idea formulation for spoken language: the interface of cognition and language. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2020;26(2):226–240. doi:10.1017/S1355617719001097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt WJM. Speaking from Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1989. doi:10.7551/mitpress/6393.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt WJM. Producing spoken language: a blueprint of the speaker. In: Brown CM, Hargoort P, eds. The Neurocognition of Language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1999: 83–122. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198507932.003.0004.
   Google Scholar
• Sherratt S. Multi-level discourse analysis: a feasible approach. Aphasiology. 2007;21(3– 4):375–393. doi:10.1080/02687030600911435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker MS, Young B, Robinson GA. Cohesive and coherent connected speech deficits in mild stroke. Brain Lang. 2017;168:23–36. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2017.01.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander MP. Impairments of procedures for implementing complex language are due to disruption of frontal attention processes. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006;12(2):236–247. doi:10.1017/S1355617706060309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker MS, Ceslis A, Robinson GA. Idea selection for propositional language production. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition. 2022;29(2):260–283. doi:10.1080/13825585.2020.1862044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson G, Shallice T, Cipolotti L. Dynamic aphasia in progressive supranuclear palsy: a deficit in generating a fluent sequence of novel thought. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(8):1344–1360. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson GA, Spooner D, Harrison WJ. Frontal dynamic aphasia in progressive supranuclear palsy: distinguishing between generation and fluent sequencing of novel thoughts. Neuropsychologia. 2015;77:62–75. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker MS, Robinson GA. Selection for sentence generation in the context of severe anomia: a case series of left temporal patients. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2019;41(4):353–363. doi:10.1080/13803395.2018.1562050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson G, Blair J, Cipolotti L. Dynamic aphasia: an inability to select between competing verbal responses. Brain. 1998;121(1):77–89. doi:10.1093/brain/121.1.7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stuss DT, Alexander MP. Is there a dysexecutive syndrome? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences. 2007;362(1481):901–915. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess PW, Shallice T Response suppression, initiation and strategy use following frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia. 1996;34(4):263–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden DL, Sale MV, Robinson GA. Age-related differences in idea generation and selection for propositional language. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition. 2019;26(4):486–506. doi:10.1080/13825585.2018.1476668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson GA. Primary progressive dynamic aphasia and Parkinsonism: generation, selection and sequencing deficits. Neuropsychologia. 2013;51(13):2534–2547. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson G, Shallice T, Bozzali M, Cipolotti L. Conceptual proposition selection and the LIFG: neuropsychological evidence from a focal frontal group. Neuropsychologia. 2010;48(6):1652–1663. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.02.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson G, Shallice T, Cipolotti L. A failure of high level verbal response selection in progressive dynamic aphasia. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2005;22(2005):661–694. doi:10.1080/02643290442000239.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aron AR, Robbins TW, Poldrack RA. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004;8(4):170–177. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson GA, Cipolotti L, Walker DG, Biggs V, Bozzali M, Shallice T. Verbal suppression and strategy use: a role for the right lateral prefrontal cortex? Brain. 2015b;138(4):1084–1096. doi:10.1093/brain/awv003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crescentini C, Lunardelli A, Mussoni A, Zadini A, Shallice T. A left basal ganglia case of dynamic aphasia or impairment of extra-language cognitive processes? Neurocase. 2008;14(2):184–203. doi:10.1080/13554790802108380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold M, Nadeau SE, Jacobs DH, Adair JC, Rothi LJG, Heilman KM. Adynamic aphasia: a transcortical motor aphasia with defective semantic strategy formation. Brain Lang. 1997;57(3):374–393. doi:10.1006/brln.1997.1750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luria AR. The Working Brain. London, UK: Penguin; 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Warren JD, Warren JE, Fox NC, Warrington EK. Nothing to say, something to sing: primary progressive dynamic aphasia. Neurocase. 2003;9(2):140–155.doi: 10.1076/neur.9.2.140.15068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake ML, Duffy JR, Myers PS, Tompkins CA. Prevalence and patterns of right hemisphere cognitive/communicative deficits: retrospective data from an inpatient rehabilitation unit. Aphasiology. 2002;16(4–6):537–547. doi:10.1080/02687030244000194.
   Google Scholar
• Chiti G, Pantoni L. Use of montreal cognitive assessment in patients with stroke. Stroke. 2014;45(10):3135–3140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong Y, Sharma VK, Chan BP-L, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is superior to the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the detection of vascular cognitive impairment after acute stroke. J Neurol Sci. 2010;299(1):15–18. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2010.08.051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancuso M, Demeyere N, Abbruzzese L, et al. Using the Oxford cognitive screen to detect cognitive impairment in stroke patients: a comparison with the mini-mental state examination. Front Neurol. 2018;9:101. doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.00101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nys GMS, van Zandvoort MJE, de Kort PLM, Jansen BPW, Kappelle LJ, de Haan EHF. Restrictions of the mini-mental state examination in acute stroke. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005b;20(5):623–629. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2005.04.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvadori E, Pasi M, Poggesi A, Chiti G, Inzitari D, Pantoni L. Predictive value of MoCA in the acute phase of stroke on the diagnosis of mid-term cognitive impairment. J Neurol. 2013;260(9):2220–2227. doi:10.1007/s00415-013-6962-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Y-J, Wang W-A, Huang F-D, et al. The use of MMSE and MoCA in patients with acute ischemic stroke in clinical. International Journal of Neuroscience. 2016;126(5):442–447. doi:10.3109/00207454.2015.1031749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt J, Hayward KS, Kwakkel G, et al. Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable taskforce. Int J Stroke. 2017;12(5):444–450. doi:10.1177/1747493017711816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson HE, Willison J. National Adult Reading Test (NART (Pp. 1–26). Windsor: Nfer- Nelson; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Bright P, Hale E, Gooch VJ, Myhill T, Van der linde I. The national adult reading test: restandardisation against the Wechsler adult intelligence scale-fourth edition. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018;28(6):1019–1027. doi:10.1080/09602011.2016.1231121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack WJ, Freed DM, Williams BW, Henderson VW. Boston Naming Test: shortened versions for use in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Gerontology (Kirkwood). 1992;47(3):154–158. doi:10.1093/geronj/47.3.P154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abeare K, Cutler L, An KY, Razvi P, Holcomb M, Erdodi LA. BNT-15: revised performance validity cutoffs and proposed clinical classification ranges. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology. 2022;35(3):155–168. doi:10.1097/WNN.0000000000000304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fastenau PS, Denburg NL, Mauer BA. Parallel short forms for the Boston Naming Test: psychometric properties and norms for older adults. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1998;20(6):828–834. doi:10.1076/jcen.20.6.828.1105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess P, Shallice T. The Hayling and Brixton Tests: Test Manual. London, UK: Thames Valley Test Company; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Warrington EK, James M. The Visual Object and Space Perception Battery. Bury St Edmunds, England: Thames Valley Test Company; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Druks J, Masterson J. Object & Action Naming Battery. Hove, U.K: Psychology Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass H, Kaplan E. Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination Booklet. Lea & Febiger; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson GA, Campbell L, Ceslis A. A goal intervention improves language fluency: evidence from Parkinson’s disease and healthy aging. Medicines. 2021b;8(3):15. doi:10.3390/medicines8030015.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss E, Sherman EM, Spreen O. A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary. American Chemical Society. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Luria AR. Higher Cortical Functions in Man. New York: Basic Books; 1966.
   Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. Released. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Costello A, Warrington EK. Dynamic aphasia: the selective impairment of verbal planning. Cortex. 1989;25(1):103–114. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(89)80010-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heweston R, Cornwell P, Shum D. Cognitive-communication disorder following right hemisphere stroke: exploring rehabilitation access and outcomes. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017;24(5):330–336. doi:10.1080/10749357.2017.1289622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potocnik J, Ovcar Stante K, Rakusa M. The validity of the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) for the screening of vascular cognitive impairment after ischemic stroke. Acta Neurol Belg. 2020;120(3):681–685. doi:10.1007/s13760-020-01330-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron AR, Robbins TW, Poldrack RA. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014;18(4):177–185. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawashima R, Satoh K, Itoh H, et al. Functional anatomy of GO/NO-GO discrimination and response selection — a PET study in man. Brain Res. 1996;728(1):79–89. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(96)00389-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konishi S, Nakajima K, Uchida I, Sekihara K, Miyashita Y. No-go dominant brain activity in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Neurosci. 1998;10(3):1209–1213. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.1998.00167.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volle E, De Lacy Costello A, Coates LM, et al. Dissociation between verbal response initiation and suppression after prefrontal lesions. Cereb Cortex. 2012;22(10):2428–2440. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Evans JJ, Emslie H, Alderman N, Burgess P. The development of an ecologically valid test for assessing patients with a dysexecutive syndrome. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1998;8(3):213–228. doi:10.1080/713755570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abusamra V, Côté H, Joanette Y, Ferreres A. Communication impairments in patients with right hemisphere damage. Life Span and Disability. 2009;12:67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Brady MC, Clark AM, Dickson S, Paton G, Barbour RS. The impact of stroke- related dysarthria on social participation and implications for rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(3):178–186. doi:10.3109/09638288.2010.517897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruice M, Worrall L, Hickson L. Quantifying aphasic people’s social lives in the context of non-aphasic peers. Aphasiology. 2006;20(12):1210–1225. doi:10.1080/02687030600790136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen J, Qualter P, Friis K, et al. Associations of loneliness and social isolation with physical and mental health among adolescents and young adults. Perspect Public Health. 2021;141(4):226–236. doi:10.1177/17579139211016077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans M, Fisher EB. Social isolation and mental health: the role of nondirective and directive social support. Community Ment Health J. 2022;58(1):20–40. doi:10.1007/s10597-021-00787-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt-Lunstad J, Steptoe A. Social isolation: an underappreciated determinant of physical health. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022;43:232–237. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.07.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee D, Levin RL, Heller W. The cognitive, emotional, and social sequelae of stroke: psychological and ethical concerns in post-stroke adaptation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2006;13(4):26–35. doi:10.1310/tsr1304-26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohde D, Gaynor E, Large M, et al. The impact of Cognitive Impairment On Poststroke Outcomes: a 5-year follow-up. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2019;32(5):275–281. doi:10.1177/0891988719853044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith KJ, Victor C. Typologies of loneliness, living alone and social isolation, and their associations with physical and mental health. Ageing and Society. 2019;39(8):1709–1730. doi:10.1017/S0144686X18000132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake ML. Right Hemisphere Strokes. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest. Groups. 2016;1(2):63–65. doi:10.1044/persp1.SIG2.63.
   Google Scholar
• Le K, Mozeiko J, Coelho C. Discourse analyses: characterizing cognitive- communication disorders following TBI. The ASHA Leader. 2011;16(2):18–21. doi:10.1044/leader.FTR4.16022011.18.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson GA, Butterworth B, Cipolotti L. “my mind is doing it all”: no “brake” to stop speech generation in Jargon Aphasia. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology. 2015c;28(4):229–241. doi:10.1097/WNN.0000000000000080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar