Psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Measure of Participation and Activities Screener in people with stroke

References

• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• de Graaf JA, van Mierlo ML, Post MWM, Achterberg WP, Kappelle LJ, Visser-Meily JMA. Long-term restrictions in participation in stroke survivors under and over 70 years of age. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(6):637–645. doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1271466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey LM, Matyas TA, Baum C. Effects of somatosensory impairment on participation after stroke. Am J Occup Ther. 2018;72(3):p72032051001–p72032051010. doi:10.5014/ajot.2018.025114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezekiel L, Collett J, Mayo NE, Pang L, Field L, Dawes H. Factors associated with participation in life situations for adults with stroke: A systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(5):945–955. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2018.06.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mole JA, Demeyere N. The relationship between early post-stroke cognition and longer term activities and participation: A systematic review. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020;30(2):346–370. doi:10.1080/09602011.2018.1464934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolwyk RJ, Mihaljcic T, Wong DK, Chapman JE, Rogers JM. Poststroke cognitive impairment negatively impacts activity and participation outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2021;52(2):748–760. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Rooij IJM, Riemens MMR, Punt M, Meijer JG, Visser-Meily JMA, van de Port IGL. To what extent is walking ability associated with participation in people after stroke? J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021;30(11):106081. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Vecchia C, Viprey M, Haesebaert J, et al. Contextual determinants of participation after stroke: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(13):1786–1798. doi:10.1080/09638288.2019.1679897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng SSM, Liu TW, Ho LYW, Chan NH, Wong TWL, Tsoh J. Assessing the level of perceived social support among community-dwelling stroke survivors using the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):19318. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-23840-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse T, Douglas J, Lentin P, Carey L. Measuring participation after stroke: A review of frequently used tools. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(1):177–192. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2012.09.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The Stroke Impact Scale version 2.0: evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30(10):2131–2140. doi:10.1161/01.STR.30.10.2131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwood RH, Rogers A, Dickinson E, Ebrahim S. Measuring handicap: The London handicap scale, a new outcome measure for chronic disease. Qual Health Care. 1994;3(1):11–16. doi:10.1136/qshc.3.1.11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fougeyrollas P, Noreau L. Life Habits Measure – Shortened Version (LIFE-H 3.0). Lac St-Charles: International Network on the Disability Creation Process; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook M, Skilbeck CE. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1983;12(2):166–170. doi:10.1093/ageing/12.2.166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum CM. The contribution of occupation to function in persons with Alzheimer’s disease. J Occup Sci. 1995;2:59–67. doi:10.1080/14427591.1995.9686396.
   Google Scholar
• Kossi O, Amanzonwe ER, Thonnard JL, Batcho CS. Applicability of international classification of functioning, disability and health-based participation measures in stroke survivors in Africa: a systematic review. Int J Rehabil Res. 2020;43(1):3–11. doi:10.1097/MRR.0000000000000377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouffioulx E, Arnould C, Thonnard JL. SATIS-Stroke: a satisfaction measure of activities and participation in the actual environment experienced by patients with chronic stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(10):836–843. doi:10.2340/16501977-0272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan H, Liu TW, Ssm N, et al. Testing the psychometric properties of the Chinese (Cantonese) version of SATIS-Stroke in people with chronic stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2024;46(1):159–169. doi:10.1080/09638288.2022.2153179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kossi O, Nindorera F, Batcho CS, Adoukonou T, Penta M, Thonnard JL. Measuring participation after stroke in Africa: Development of the participation measurement scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(4):652–659. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2017.10.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post MW, de Witte LP, Reichrath E, Verdonschot MM, Wijlhuizen GJ, Perenboom RJ. Development and validation of IMPACT-S, an ICF-based questionnaire to measure activities and participation. J Rehabil Med. 2008 Aug;40(8):620–627. doi:10.2340/16501977-0223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Zee CH, Priesterbach AR, van der Dussen L, et al. Reproducibility of three self-report participation measures: The ICF measure of participation and activities screener, the participation scale, and the Utrecht scale for evaluation of rehabilitation-participation. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42(8):752–757. doi:10.2340/16501977-0589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Zee CH, Post MW, Brinkhof MW, Wagenaar RC. Comparison of the Utrecht scale for evaluation of rehabilitation-participation with the ICF measure of participation and activities screener and the WHO disability assessment schedule II in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(1):87–93. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askin A, Atar E, Tosun A, Demirdal U, Koca O. Activities and participation after stroke: Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of IMPACT-S questionnaire. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(13):1912–1917. doi:10.1080/09638288.2018.1542038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenk Zu Schweinsberg E, Lange J, Schucany M, Wendel C. Participation following stroke-validation of the German version of IMPACT-S. Rehabil (Stuttg). 2015;54(3):160–165. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1545358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung EY, Lam G. Validation of two scales for measuring participation and perceived stigma in Chinese community-based rehabilitation programs. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):105. doi:10.1186/s12955-018-0938-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186–3191. doi:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–549. doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erik VE, Douglas GA, Matthias E, Stuart JP, Peter CG, Jan PV. STROBE initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Int Med. 2007;147(8):573–577. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for comparing two alpha coefficients. Appl Psychol Measure. 2003;27(1):72–74. doi:10.1177/0146621602239477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16(3):232–240. doi:10.1177/154596802401105171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández ED, Forero SM, Galeano CP, Barbosa NE, Sunnerhagen KS, Alt Murphy M. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of Fugl-Meyer Assessment of lower extremity early after stroke. Braz J Phys Ther. 2021;25(6):709–718. doi:10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.12.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Chiu H, Kwong P. Cross-validation of the Geriatric Depression Scale short form in the Hong Kong elderly. Bullet Hong Kong Psychol Soc. 1994;32:72–77.
   Google Scholar
• Chau J, Martin CR, Thompson DR, Chang AM, Woo J. Factor structure of the Chinese version of the Geriatric Depression Scale. Psychol, Health & Med. 2006;11(1):48–59. doi:10.1080/13548500500093688.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ho LYW, Lai CKY, Ng SSM. Measuring fatigue following stroke: The Chinese version of the Fatigue Assessment Scale. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(22):3234–3241. doi:10.1080/09638288.2020.1730455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong AYC, Man DWK. The validation of the Hong Kong Chinese version of the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale for institutionalized elderly persons. OTJR Occup Part Heal. 2002;22(4):132–142. doi:10.1177/153944920202200402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu TW, Ng SS, Ng GY. Translation and initial validation of the Chinese (Cantonese) version of Community Integration Measure for use in patients with chronic stroke. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:1–7. doi:10.1155/2014/623836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess. 1994;6(4):284–290. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284.
   Google Scholar
• Stratford PW. Estimating the standard error of measurement from reliability studies. Physiother Can. 2004;56(1):27–30. doi:10.2310/6640.2004.15377.
   Google Scholar
• Abma IL, Rovers M, van der Wees PJ. Appraising convergent validity of patient-reported outcome measures in systematic reviews: Constructing hypotheses and interpreting outcomes. BMC Res Notes. 2016;19(9):226. doi:10.1186/s13104-016-2034-2.
   Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. London: Pearsons; 2013.
   Google Scholar