From Decentralization to Coordination: The Evolution of Russian Paradiplomacy (1991 – 2021)

References

• Agreement between the Government of the Komi SSR and the Government of the Republic of Hungary on Trade and Economic Relations and Scientific and Technical Cooperation. 1991. December 6. National Archive of the Komi Republic. F. R-2385. Ministry of External Relations of the Komi SSR. Op. 1. D. 5. On 8 l.
   Google Scholar
• Aleksandrov, Oleg. 2005. Regiony vo vneshnei politike Rossii. Rol’ Severo-Zapada [Regions in Russia’s Foreign Policy. The Role of the North-West]. Moscow: MGIMO.
   Google Scholar
• Alekseyev, Mikhail. 2003. Regionalism of Russia’s Foreign Policy in the 1990s: A Case of “Reverse Anarchy.” The Donald W. Treadgold Papers 37, March.
   Google Scholar
• “Analitiki vyiasnili: Tol’ko 11 iz 85 regionov RF imeiut finansovye rezervy” [Analysts Found that Only 11 of the 85 Regions of the Russian Federation Have Financial Reserves]. 2018. ZNAK, April 12. Accessed November 29, 2020. https://www.znak.com/2018-04-12/analitiki_vyyasnili_tolko_11_iz_85_regionov_rf_imeyut_finansovye_rezervy
   Google Scholar
• An Agreement between the Ministry of Culture, the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Komi and the Ministry of Culture and Education of the Republic of Hungary on Cooperation in the Field of Culture and Education. 1993. Vedomosti of the Legal Acts of the Republic of Komi 3, June: 40–43.
   Google Scholar
• Arteev, Sergey. 2021. “Foreign Policy of Russia: ‘Soft Power’ of the Regions.” Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics 13 (1): 32–57. doi:10.48015/2076-7404-2021-13-1-32-57. (In Russian.)
   Google Scholar
• Committee on External Relations of the Leningrad Region. 2021. Accessed September 10, 2021. https://inter.lenobl.ru/ru/ (In Russian.)
   Google Scholar
• Conventions and Agreements of the Council of Europe, Which the Russian Federation Has Joined. 2021. MID Website. Accessed October 15, 2021. https://coe.mid.ru/ru/konvencii
   Google Scholar
• Cornago, Noé. 1999. “Diplomacy and Paradiplomacy in the Redefinition of International Security: Dimensions of Conflict and Co-Operation.” Regional & Federal Studies 9 (1): 40–57. doi:10.1080/13597569908421070
   Google Scholar
• Cornago, Noé. 2010. “On the Normalization of Sub-State Diplomacy.” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 5 (1): 11–36. doi:10.1163/187119110790930869
   Google Scholar
• “Daghestani Police Thwart ‘Anti-Azerbaijani’ Protest.” 2013. RFE/RL, June 13. Accessed November 28, 2020. https://www.rferl.org/a/daghestan-street-protests-Azerbaijan/25015974.html
   Google Scholar
• Duran, Manuel. 2015. Mediterranean Paradiplomacies. The Dynamics of Diplomatic Reterritorialization. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Law of January 4. 1999 No. 4-FZ. “On Coordination of International and Foreign Economic Relations of the Subjects of the Russian Federation.” Rossiiskaia Gazeta 2117 (8): 5. (In Russian.)
   Google Scholar
• Gel’man, Vladimir. 2006. “Vozvrashenie Leviafana? (Politika retsentralizatsii v sovremennoi Rossii)” [Leviathan’s Return: The Policy of Recentralization in Contemporary Russia]. Polis. Political Studies 2: 90–109.
   Google Scholar
• Golosov, Grigorii, and Marina Konstantinova. 2016. “Gubernatorial Powers in Russia: The Transformation of Regional Institutions under the Centralizing Control of the Federal Authorities.” Problems of Post-Communism 63 (4): 241–52. doi:10.1080/10758216.2016.1146906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joenniemi, Pertti, and Alexander Sergunin. 2014. “Paradiplomacy as a Capacity- Building Strategy.” Problems of Post-Communism 61 (6): 18–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Kogda v region prikhodit kaznacheistvo” [When the Treasury Comes to the Region]. 2018. Vedomosti, January 23. Accessed November 29, 2020. https://www.vedomosti.ru/opinion/articles/2018/01/23/748622-prihodit-kaznacheistvo
   Google Scholar
• Konarzewska, Natalia. 2018. “Leadership Change in Dagestan.” The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst, February 20. Accessed April 23, 2021. https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/13498-leadership-change-in-dagestan.html
   Google Scholar
• “Kudrin prizval dat’ regionam bol’she biudzhetnoi svobody” [Kudrin Called for Giving the Regions More Budget Freedom]. 2017. Vedomosti, February 27. Accessed November 29, 2020. https://www.vedomosti.ru/economics/articles/2017/02/27/679204-kudrin-regionam-byudzhetnoi-svobodi
   Google Scholar
• Kuznetsov, Alexander. 2015. Theory and Practice of Paradiplomacy. Subnational Governments in International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Logvinova, Inna. 2018. Koordinatsiia mezhdunarodnykh i vnezhneekonomicheskikh sviazei sub”ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Coordination in International and External Economic Relations of the Russian Federal Subjects]. Moscow: MGIMO.
   Google Scholar
• Luzin, Pavel. 2018. “Ramzan Kadyrov: Russia’s Top Diplomat.” Riddle, April 19. Accessed November 29, 2020. https://www.ridl.io/en/ramzan-kadyrov-russias-top-diplomat/
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, Nicholas, and Alexei Novikov. 1997. “Refederalizing Russia: Debates on the Idea of Federalism in Russia.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 27 (2): 187–203. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a029905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makarychev, Andrey. 2000a. “Federalizm epokhi globalizma: Vyzovy dlia regional’noi Rossii” [The Federalism of the Epoch of Globalism: The Challenges for Regional Russia]. Polis 5:81–97.
   Google Scholar
• Makarychev, Andrey. 2000b. Rossiiskie regiony kak mezhdunarodnye aktory: Analiticheskii doklad [The Russian Regions as International Actors: An Analytical Report]. Nizhnii Novgorod.
   Google Scholar
• Makarychev, Andrey, and Alexandra Yatsyk. 2018. “Russian ‘Federalism’: Illiberal? Imperial? Exceptionalist?” Slavic Review 77 (4): 912–18. doi:10.1017/slr.2018.289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markushina, N.Y., and N. T. Kharlampieva. 2008. Regiony vo vneshnei politike Rossii. Rol’ Severo-Zapada [The North-West Federal District: External Relations]. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg University Press.
   Google Scholar
• “Meeting with Prime Minister of Bavaria Horst Seehofer.” 2016. President of Russia website, February 3. Accessed November 29, 2020. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/51266
   Google Scholar
• “Memorandum o sotrudnichestve podpisali Agentstvo po predprinimatel’stvu Dagestana i GAZPROMa” [Memorandum of Cooperation Signed between the Entrepeneurship Agency of Dagestan and GAZPROM]. 2016. RIA Dagestan, November. Accessed September 20, 2021. https://www.riadagestan.ru/news/tourism_events/memorandum_o_sotrudnichestve_podpisali_agentstvo_po_predprinimatelstvu_dagestana_i_azpromo/
   Google Scholar
• “Mezhbiudzhetnaia voina. Ekonomicheskaia politika” [Inter-Budget War: Economic Policy]. 2005. Kommersant, November 18. Accessed November 29, 2020. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/627700
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, Martin. 2003. “Characterising Centre-Periphery Relations in the Yeltsin Era.” In Russian Regions and Regionalism. Strength through Weakness, edited by Graeme Herd and Anne Aldis, 3–18. Abingdon: Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• “Polnomochiia i funktsii” [Competencies and Functions]. n.d. Ministry of Tourism and National Arts of Dagestan website. Accessed April 23, 2021. http://www.dagtourism.com/polnomochiya,_zadachi_i_funktsii
   Google Scholar
• “Obshchaia informatsiia” [General Information]. 2021. Ministry of Industry and Commerce of the Republic of Dagestan. Accessed April 23, 2021. http://www.minpromdag.ru/naimenovanie
   Google Scholar
• Orttung, Robert W., Danielle N. Lussier, and Anna Paretskaya, eds. 2019. The Republics and Regions of the Russian Federation: A Guide to the Politics, Policies, and Leaders. EastWest Institute. Abingdon: Routledge (Book first published by Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe 2000).
   Google Scholar
• Oversloot, Hans. 2013. “The Homogeneity of Russia, or the Remains of an Empire.” In Managing Ethnic Diversity in Russia, edited by Oleh Protsyk and Benedikt Harzl, 87–110. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, Craig. 2007. How to Map Arguments in Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pietrasiak, Małgorzata, and Michał Słowikowski. 2018. “The International Activity of Federal Subjects of the Russian Federation on the Case of the Far East.” In Paradiplomacy in Asia. Case Studies of China, India and Russia, edited by Małgorzata Pietrasiak, Grzegorz Bywalec, Tomasz Kamiński, Dominik Mierzejewski, and Słowikowski Michał, 137–202. Łódź: Łódź University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plotnikova, Olga. 2004. Teoriia, sistema i praktika mezhdunarodnykh sviazei regionov [Theory, System, and Practice of International Relations of the Regions]. Novosibirsk: Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Plotnikova, Olga, and Olga Dubrovina. 2016. Mezhdunarodnye sviazi regionov gosudarstv: Kharakteristika i osobennosti [International Relations of the Regions States: Characteristics and Features]. Moscow: Norma; INFRA-M.
   Google Scholar
• “President Aliyev: Dagestan Always Was and Will Be a Native Land for Us.” 2016. AzerNews, May 12. Accessed 23 April, 2021. https://www.azernews.az/nation/96517.html
   Google Scholar
• “Putin: Poteri ot raspada RF v kontse 1990-kh byli by bol’she, chem ot operatsii v Chechne” [Putin: The Losses from the Collapse of the Russian Federation in the Late 1990s Would Have Been Greater than from the Operation in Chechnya]. 2018. TASS, March 11. Accessed November 28, 2020. https://tass.ru/politika/5020864
   Google Scholar
• Renaldi, Micheal. 2019. “Tatarstani Paradiplomacy: Persistence Through Competitive Identity.” MA thesis, University of Tartu.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, Cameron. 2010. “Federalism and Inter-Governmental Relations in Russia.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 26 (2): 165–87. doi:10.1080/13523271003712476.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, Cameron, and Adrian Campbell. 2009. Federalism and Local Politics in Russia. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sergunin, Aleksandr. 2001. “Mezhdunarodnaia deiatel’nost’ sub”ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Pravovoe regulirovanie” [International Activities of Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation: Legal Regulation]. Vestnik Nizhnii Novgorod Universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskii. 1:276–83.
   Google Scholar
• “Shamil.” 2021. Spokane Historical Website. Accessed April 23, 2021. https://spokanehistorical.org/items/show/190
   Google Scholar
• Sharafutdinova, Gulnaz. 2003. “Paradiplomacy in the Russian Regions: Tatarstan’s Search for Statehood.” Europe-Asia Studies 55 (4): 613–29. doi:10.1080/0966813032000084028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokirianskaya, Ekaterina, Ekaterina Khodzhaeva, and Denis Sokolov. 2019. Fading Out Federalism: Daghestan and Tatarstan under Conditions of Continued Centralization. Moscow: Conflict Analysis and Prevention Center.
   Google Scholar
• Soldatos, Panayotis. 1990. “An Explanatory Framework for the Study of Federated States as Foreign-Policy Actors.” In Federalism and International Relations, edited by Hans Michelmann and Panayotis Soldatos, 34–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Souleimanov, Emil. 2016. “The Impact of Russia’s Turkey Sanctions on the North Caucasus.” The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst, February 11. Accessed November 29, 2020. https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/13326-the-impact-of-russias-Turkey-sanctions-on-the-north-caucasus.html
   Google Scholar
• Starodubtsev, Andrey. 2018. Federalism and Regional Policy in Contemporary Russia. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stoliarov, Mikhail. 2003. Federalism and the Dictatorship of Power in Russia. London. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stremoukhov, Denis. 2021. “When Governors Go Abroad: Incentives for Paradiplomacy in Recentralised Russia.” Regional & Federal Studies 1–25. doi: 10.1080/13597566.2021.1919095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchkov, Maxim. 2018. “The Caucasus.” In Routledge Handbook of Russian Foreign Policy, edited by Andrei Tsygankov, 311–24. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tatarstan government website. 2021. Accessed November 29, 2020. https://tatarstan.ru/about/vs.htm
   Google Scholar
• Tavares, Rodrigo. 2015. Paradiplomacy: Cities and States as Global Players. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tolstykh, Vladislav. 2004. Mezhdunarodnaia deiatel’nost’ sub”ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii [International Activity of Subjects of the Russian Federation]. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2021. Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation website. Accessed November 29, 2021. https://www.economy.gov.ru/material/directions/vneshneekonomicheskaya_deyatelnost/mnogostoronnee_ekonomicheskoe_sotrudnichestvo/organizaciya_obedinennyh_naciy_oon/programma_razvitiya_oon_proon/
   Google Scholar
• Valiyev, Anar. 2011. “Azerbaijan and the North Caucasus: A Pragmatic Relationship.” Caucasus Analytical Digest 27 (May): 27.
   Google Scholar
• “Vstrecha s glavami regionov v ramkah Rossiiskogo investitsionnogo foruma ‘Sochi-2018’” [Meeting with Regional Heads during the Sochi 2018 Investment Forum]. 2018. Russian government website, February 16. Accessed November 29, 2020. http://government.ru/news/31397/
   Google Scholar
• Ware, Robert, and Enver Kisriev. 2010. Dagestan: Russian Hegemony and Islamic Resistance in the North Caucasus. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelmsen, Julie. 2018. “Russian Governance of the North Caucasus: Dilemmas of Force and Inclusion.” In Security, Society and the State in the Caucasus, edited by Derek Averre and Kevork Oskanian, 37–56. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zakharov, Andrei. 2011. “Russian Federalism as a ‘Dormant’ Institution.” Russian Politics & Law 49 (4): 8–17. doi:10.2753/RUP1061-1940490401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubarevich, Natalia. 2014. “politika V Otnoshenii Regionov U Nas Kolonial’naja” [Our Policy Towards the Regions Is Colonial]. Argumenti i Fakti, June 19. Accessed November 29, 2020. https://aif.ru/money/economy/1190456
   Google Scholar