The Frequency and Placement of Main Idea Topic Sentences in College Psychology Textbooks

References

• Afflerbach, P. (1987). How are main idea statements constructed? Watch the experts! Journal of Reading, 30, 512–518.
   Google Scholar
• Afflerbach, P. (1990). The influence of prior knowledge on expert readers' main idea construction strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 31–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, P. J., O'Hear, M. F., & Pherson, V.E. (1985). The value of main idea clues for use with college textbooks. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 18, 59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Alls, M. W. (1975). Expository paragraph properties that influence literal recall. Journal of Reading Behavior, 7, 391–400.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, J. F. (1981). Effect of ideation prominence on children's reading comprehension of expository prose. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13 (I), 49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, J. F. (1982). Research on children's main idea comprehension: A problem of ecological validity. Reading Psychology, 3 (2), 167–177.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, J. F. (1983). Children's ability to comprehend main ideas in content textbooks. Reading World, 22, 322–331.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, J. F. (1984). The effectiveness of a direct instruction paradigm for teaching main idea comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 93–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann, J. F. (1984). The effect of restructured content textbook passages on middle grade students' comprehension of main ideas: Making the inconsiderate considerate. Paper presented at the meeting of the 34th National Reading Conference, St. Petersburg, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, J. F., & Sierra, J. F. (1984). The frequency and placement of main ideas in children's social studies textbooks: A modified replication of Braddock's research on topic sentences. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 27–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braddock, R. (1974). The frequency and placement of topic sentences in expository prose. Research in the Teaching of English, 8, 287–302.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, B. K., Glynn, S. M., & Smith, J. (1985). Cognitive demands of processing expository text. In B. Britton & J. Black (Eds.) Understanding expository text (pp. 227–248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A., & Day, J. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, B. R., Matthews, S. R., & Bigger, G. (1979). Individual differences in the recall of lower-level textual information (Report No. 150). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 181 448).
   Google Scholar
• Fernald, L. D. & Fernald, P. S. (1985). Introduction to Psychology (5th ed.). Dubuque, Iowa: William C. Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, M. F., Bowers, P. S., & DeLucia, S. W. The frequency and placement of main ideas in children's science textbooks. Annual Meeting of National Reading Conference. November 29, 1990, Miami.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, V. C., Rabinowitz, M., & Schieble, K. M. (1989). Text effects on main idea comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 72–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kieras, D. E. (1978). Good and bad structure in simple paragraphs: Effects on apparent theme, reading time, and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 13–28.
   Google Scholar
• Kieras, D. E. (1980). Initial mention as a signal to thematic content in technical passages. Memory and Cognition, 8, 345–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefton, L. (1985). Psychology (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Papalia, D. E., & Olds, S. W. (1985). Psychology New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P.D., & Johnson, D. D. (1978). Teaching reading comprehension. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Rathus, S. (1985). Psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. M. (1980). Children's memory for expository text after reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 399–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies for discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Werney, R., Bridge, C., & Cera, M. (1978–1979). The discourse processing operations of children. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 539–597.
   Google Scholar
• Winograd, P. N. (1984). Strategic difficulties in summarizing texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 404–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wortman, C. B., Loftus, E. F. & Marshall, M. E. (1985). Psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar