Mapping Strategies

References

• Ahmad, I. S. & Asraf, R. M. (2004). Making sense of text: Strategies used by good and average readers. Reading Matrix, 26–37. Retrieved March 10, 2007, from http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/asraf_ahmad/article.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Amer, A. A. (1994). The effect of knowledge-map and underlining training on reading comprehension. ESP Journal, 13, 35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. H., & Armbruster, B. B. (1985). Study strategies and their implications for textbook design. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 159–173.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, W. (2004). Learning strategies in reading and writing: EAP contexts. RELC Journal, 35(3), 299–328.
   Google Scholar
• Bang, H. J., & Zhao, C. G. (2007). Reading strategies used by advanced Korean and Chinese ESL graduate students: A case study. The Reading Matrix, 7(1). Retrieved February 10, 2008, from http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles.
   Google Scholar
• Basque, J., & Pudelco, B. (2004). The effect of collaborative knowledge modeling at a distance on performance and on learning. In A. J. Canas, J. D. Novak, & F. M. Gonzalez (Eds.), Concept maps: Theory, methodology, technology. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping. Spain: Pamplona.
   Google Scholar
• Birbili, M. (2006). Mapping knowledge: Concept maps in early childhood education. Early Childhood Research and Practice (ECRP), 8(2). Retrieved June 5, 2008, from http://ecrp.uiuc.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Cashen, V. M., & Leicht, K. L. (1970). The role of the isolation effect in a formal educational setting. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 484–486.
   Google Scholar
• Celce-Murcia, M. (1991). Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, K., Sung, T., & Chen, I. (2002). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(1), 5–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chastain, K. (1988). Developing second language skills: Theory and practice. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, G. K. W. K., Baker, E. L., & Cheak, A. M. (2002). Knowledge Mapper authoring system prototype (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 575). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, J. W., Carnot, M. J., Feltovich, P. J., Feltovich, J., Hoffman, R. R., Cañas, A. J., & Novak, J. D. (2003). A Summary of Literature Pertaining to the Use of Concept Mapping Techniques and Technologies for Education and Performance Support. Technical Report submitted to the Chief of Naval Education and Training, Pensacola, FL.
   Google Scholar
• D'Amore, R. D., Konchady, M. & Obrst, L. (2000). Knowledge mapping aids discovery of organizational information. The EDGE Newsletter, MITRE, 4(1). Retrieved February 10, 2008, from http://www.mitre.org/pubs/edge/april_00/damore.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Dehmireh, M. (1991). Intermediate reading comprehension. Tehran: Rahnama Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Duchnowski, A., Sheffield, S., & Kutash, K. (2005). Reading strategies for special populations. Tampa, FL: Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Ghassemi, E. (2006). The effect of anxiety on reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners: A case of gender study. Unpublished manuscript, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R. H., & O'Donnell, A. M. (1996). Cognitive and affective outcomes of learning from knowledge maps. Contemorary. Educational. Psychology, 21, 94–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, Y. C. J., & Cifuentes, L. (2006). Student-generated visualization as a study strategy for science concept learning. Educational Technology & Society, 9(3), 137–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambiotte, J. G., Dansearu, D. T., Cross, D. R., & Reynolds, S. B. (1989). Multirelational semantics maps. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 331–364.
   Google Scholar
• Jalilifar, A. R., Hayati, A. M., & Saki, A. (2008). Question strategies in testing reading comprehension: A comparative study of pre-questioning, post-questioning, and infixing. Iranian Journal of Language Studies, 2(2), 215–236.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H. & Wilhelm, K. H. (2008). Exploring pedagogical reasoning: Reading strategy instruction from two teachers' perspectives. The Reading Matrix, 8(1), 96–110. Retrieved June 5, 2008, from www.readingmatrix.com.
   Google Scholar
• Lorch, R. F., Jr., Lorch, E. P., & Klusewitz, M. A. (1995). Effects of typographical cues on reading and recall of text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(1), 51–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCagg, E. C. & Dansereau, D. F. (1991). A convergent paradigm for examining knowledge-mapping as a reading strategy. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 317–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, N. L., Cañas, A. J., & Novak, J. D. (2006). Preconceptions regarding concept maps held by Panamanian teachers. In A. J. Cañas & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Concept Mapping. (Vol. 1, pp. 153–161). San José, Costa Rica: Universidad de Costa Rica.
   Google Scholar
• Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreland, J. L., Dansereau, D. F., & Chmielewski, T. L. (1997). Recall of descriptive information: The roles of presentation format, annotation strategy, and individual differences. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(4), 521–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nist, S. I., & Simpson, M. (2002). College studying. In Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P.B., Pearson, P. D., & Barr, R. Handbook of reading research. Volume III. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. P., & Gowin, D. P. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nunan, D. (1997). Strategy training in the language classroom: An empirical investigation. RELC Journal, 28, (2), 56–81.
   Google Scholar
• O'Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., & Hall, R. H. (2002). Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 71–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauk, W. (1989). How to study in college. Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Phan, N. (2006). Effective reading. Asian EFL Journal, 15(1). Retrieved May 2007, from www.asian-efl-journal.com.
   Google Scholar
• Povstay, E. J. (1984). Show me your underlines: A strategy to teach comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 37, 828–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Frooman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How should reading be taught? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(2), 31–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reutzel, D. R. (1985). Story maps improve comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 38, 400–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rewey, K. L., Dansereau, D. F., Skaggs, L. P., & Hall, R. H. (1989). Effects of scripted cooperation and knowledge maps on the processing of technical material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 604–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rewey, K. L., Dansereau, D. F., Dees, S. M., Skaggs, L. P., & Pitre, U. (1992). Scripted cooperation and knowledge-map supplements: Effects on the recall of biological and statistical information. Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 93–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, K. (2007). The key for successful reader-writer interaction: Factors affecting reading comprehension in L2 revisited. The Asian EFL Journal, 9(3), 198–220.
   Google Scholar
• Salataci, R., & Akyel, A. (2002). Possible effects of strategy instruction on L1 and L2 Reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(1). Retrieved June 5, 2008, from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl.
   Google Scholar
• Santa, C. M., Havens, L. T., & Maycumber, E. M. (1996). Project CRISS. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Saricoban, A. (2002). Reading strategies of successful readers through the three phase approach. The Reading Matrix, 2(3), 1–16. Retrieved June 5, 2008, from www.readingmatrix.com.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, F. (1985). Understanding reading (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Vail, E. F. (1999). Knowledge mapping: Getting started with knowledge management. Information System Management, 16(4), 16–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vianty, M. (2007). The comparison of students' use of metacognitive reading strategies between reading in Bahasa Indonesia and in English. International Education Journal, 8(2), 449–460.
   Google Scholar
• Yanez, R. (1987). Teaching reading at the intermediate level. A TESOL Professional Anthology, 81–95.
   Google Scholar
• Yiğiter, K., Sariçoban, A., & Gürses, T. (2005). Reading strategies employed by ELT learners at the advanced level. The Reading Matrix, 5(1), 124–139.
   Google Scholar