176
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Teaching Textual Conversations: Intertextuality in the College Reading Classroom

Pages 6-21 | Published online: 07 Jul 2014

References

  • Armstrong, S. L. (2007). Beginning the literacy transition: Postsecondary students' conceptualizations of academic writing in developmental literacy contexts (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • ACT, Inc. (2009). Compass/ESL test. Iowa City, IA: Magna Publications Inc.
  • Allen, G. (2000). Intertextuality. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Alvermann, D. E., Moon, J. S., & Hagood, M. C. (1999). General culture in the classroom: Teaching and researching critical media literacy. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
  • American experience: LBJ. (1991). WGBH Educational Foundation. Boston, MA: David Grubin Productions, Inc.
  • Berkin, C., Miller, C. L., Cherny, R. W., & Gormly, J. L. (1990). Making America: A history of the United States, Vol II. Since 1865. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Bloome, D., & Egan-Robertson, A. (1993). The social construction of intertextuality and classroom reading and writing. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(4), 303–333.
  • Breiter, J. C. (1990). Using a multi-text/cooperative learning approach in a methods course [Part I]. Iowa State University of Science and Technology. Ames, Iowa: Research Institute for Studies in Education.
  • Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281.
  • Crouch-Shinn, J., & Shaughnessy, M. F. (1984). Brain research: Implications for education [electronic version]. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED271707).
  • Curry, M. J. (2003). Skills, access, and basic writing: A community college case study from the United States. Studies in the Education of Adults, 35(1), 5–18.
  • Davidson, P. B. (1990). Secrets of the Vietnam War. Novato, CA: Presidio.
  • El-Hindi, A. E. (2003). Connecting reading and writing: College learners' metacognitive awareness. In N. A. Stahl, & H. Boylan (Eds.). Teaching developmental reading: Historical, theoretical, and practical background readings (pp. 350–362). Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin's.
  • Foer, J. S. (2005). Extremely loud & incredibly close. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Goodman, Y. M., & Marek, A. M. (1996). Retrospective miscue analysis: Revaluing readers and reading. Katonah, NY: Richard C. Owen Publishers, Inc.
  • Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (1996). Study strategies have meager support: A review with recommendations for implementation. Journal of Higher Education, 67(6), 692–715.
  • Hartman, D. K. (1991). Eight readers reading: The intertextual links of able readers using multiple passages. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois, Urbana.
  • Hartman, D. K. (1995). Eight readers reading: The intertextual links of proficient readers reading multiple passages. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(3), 520–561.
  • Hartman, J. A., & Hartman, D. K. (1995). Creating a classroom culture that promotes inquiry-oriented discussions: Reading and talking about multiple texts. (Technical Report No. 621). Urbana, IL: Illinois University, Urbana Center for the Study of Reading.
  • Hawking, S. (1998). A brief history of time. New York, NY: Bantam.
  • Holschuh, J. P. (2003). Do as I say, not as I do: High, average, and low-performing students' strategy use in biology. In N. A. Stahl, & H. Boylan (Eds.). Teaching developmental reading: Historical, theoretical, and practical background readings (pp. 316–329). Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin's.
  • Hynd, C. R. (1999). Teaching students to think critically using multiple texts in history. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 42(6), 428–436.
  • Hynd-Shanahan, C., Holschuh, J. P., & Hubbard, B. (2004). Thinking like a historian: College students' reading of multiple historical documents. Journal of Literacy Research, 36(2), 141–176.
  • Johnson, L. L., & Carpenter, K. (2000). College reading programs. In R. F. Flippo & D. C. Caverly (Eds.), Handbook of college reading and study strategy research (pp. 321–363). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Kristeva, J. (1968). Problemes de la structuration du texte, dans: Theorie d'ensemble. Paris, France: Seuil/Tel Quel.
  • Kristeva, J. (1967/1986). Word, dialogue, and novel (A. Jardine, T. Gora, & L. S. Roudiez, Trans.). In T. Moi (Ed.), The Kristeva reader (pp. 34–61). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published in 1967).
  • Lenski, S. D. (1998). Intertextual intentions: Making connections across texts. Clearing House, 72(2), 74–80.
  • McWhorter, K. (2011). Efficient and flexible reading. New York, NY: Pearson Longman.
  • Newman, M. C. (2008). Disciplinary knowledge, intertextuality, and developmental readers: A study of community college students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL.
  • Nist, S. L., & Simpson, M. L. (2000). College studying. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 645–666). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
  • Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of ethical and intellectual development in the college years. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Pike, D. (1984, August 22). Fact or fiction? Christian Science Monitor, p. 15.
  • Porter, G. (1984, August 9). Lessons of the Tonkin Gulf crisis. Christian Science Monitor, p. 15.
  • Rasnak, M. A. (1995). Metacognitive dimensions of the election and use of learning strategies by adult college students and traditional-age college students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL.
  • Rosenblatt, L. M. (1994). The transactional theory of reading and writing. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 1057–1092). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
  • Rothman, D. & Warsi, J. (2010). Read to succeed: A thematic approach to academic reading. New York: Pearson Longman,.
  • Rusk, D. (1990). As I saw it. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
  • Sanchez, D., & Paulson, E. J. (2008). Critical language awareness and learners in college transitional English. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 36(2), 164–176.
  • Satrapi, M. (2004). Persepolis: The story of a childhood. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
  • Schraw, G., & Bruning, R. (1996). Readers' implicit models of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(3), 290–305.
  • Seixas, P. (1993). Historical understanding among adolescents in a multicultural setting. Curriculum Inquiry, 23(3), 301–327.
  • Shakespeare (1997). King Lear. In S. Greenblatt, W. Cohen, J. E. Howard, & K. E. Maus (Eds). The Norton Shakespeare (pp. 2307–2479). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
  • Shaughnessy, M. (1977). Some needed research on writing. College Composition and Communication, 28(4), 317–320.
  • Short, K. G. (1992). Researching intertextuality within collaborative classroom learning environments. Linguistics and Education, 4, 313–333.
  • Simpson, M. L., & Nist, S. L. (2002). Encouraging active reading at the college level. In M. Pressley & C. Collins Block (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 365–379). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Simpson, M. L., & Nist, S. L. (2003). An update on strategic learning: It's more than textbook reading strategies. In N. A. Stahl, & H. Boylan (Eds). Teaching developmental reading: Historical, theoretical, and practical background readings (pp. 157–178). Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin's.
  • Spivey, N. M. (1997). The constructivist metaphor: Reading writing and the making of meaning. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
  • Stahl, N. A., Simpson, M. L., & Hayes, C. G. (1992). Ten recommendations from research for teaching high-risk college students. Journal of Developmental Education, 16(1), 2–4, 6, 8.
  • Steuck, W. (1990). Vietnam lecture: The Tonkin Gulf Incident. Unpublished film of a class lecture. University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
  • Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73–87.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.