Learning From Student Retrospective Reports: Implications for the College Developmental Classroom

References

• Aghaie, R., & Zhang, L. J. (2012). Effects of explicit instruction in cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies on Iranian EFL students’ reading performance and strategy transfer. Instructional Science, 40(6), 1063–1081. doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9202-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrose, V. K., Davis, A., & Ziegler, M. F. (2013). From research to practice: A framework for contextualizing teaching and learning. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 44(1), 35–50. doi:10.1080/10790195.2013.10850371
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, S. L., Stahl, N. A., & Kantner, M. J. (2015). Investigating academic literacy expectations: A curriculum audit model. Journal of Developmental Education, 38(2), 2–4,6,8–9,12–13,23.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, S. W., Llosa, L., & Fredrick, T. (2013). The challenges of writing exposition: Lessons from a study of ELL and non-ELL high school students. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 29(4), 358–380. doi:10.1080/10573569.2013.758938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boylan, H. R., Bliss, L., & Bonham, B. S. (1997). Program components and their relationship to student performance. Journal of Developmental Education, 20(3), 2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bridgeman, B., & Carlson, S. B. (1984). Survey of academic writing tasks. Written Communication, 1(2), 247–280. doi:10.1177/0741088384001002004
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1–14. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(83)80002-4
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., Day, J. D., & Jones, R. S. (1983). The development of plans for summarizing texts. Child Development, 54, 968–979. doi:10.2307/1129901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. I., Fishco, V. V., & Hanna, G. S. (1993). The Nelson-Denny Reading Test, Forms G and H. Itasca, IL: Riverside/Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, D. T. (2007). Redefining college readiness. Eugene, OR: Education Policy Improvement Center. Retrieved from https://www.epiconline.org/
   Google Scholar
• De La Paz, S., & Sherman, C. K. (2013). Revising strategy instruction in inclusive settings: Effects for English learners and novice writers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28(3), 129–141. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87(3), 215–251. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (revised ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erlandsson, M., & Jansson, A. (2013). Verbal reports and domain-specific knowledge: A comparison between collegial and retrospective verbalisation. Cognition, Technology & Work, 15(3), 239–254. doi:10.1007/s10111-012-0223-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington-Flint, L., Coyne, E., Stiller, J., & Heath, E. (2008). Variability in children’s early reading strategies. Educational Psychology, 28(6), 643–661. doi:10.1080/01443410802140958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flower, L. S., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. doi:10.2307/356600
   Google Scholar
• Garner, R. (1985). Text summarization deficiencies among older students: Awareness or production ability? American Educational Research Journal, 22(4), 549. doi:10.3102/00028312022004549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griva, E., Alevriadou, A., & Semoglou, K. (2012). Reading preferences and strategies employed by primary school students: Gender, socio-cognitive and citizenship issues. International Education Studies, 5(2), 24–35. doi:10.5539/ies.v5n2p24
   Google Scholar
• Hale, G., Taylor, C., Bridgeman, B., Carson, J., Kroll, B., & Kantor, R. (1996). A study of writing tasks assigned in academic degree programs ( RR-95-44, TOEFL-RR-54). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, G. L., & Beres, D. (2007). The writing strategies of post-secondary students with writing difficulties. Exceptionality Education Canada, 17(2), 221–242. Retrieved from http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/eei/vol217/iss222/225
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1986). Producing written summaries: Task demands, cognitive operations, and implications for instruction. Review of Educational Research, 56(4), 473–493. doi:10.3102/00346543056004473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holschuh, J. P. (2014). The common core goes to college: The potential for disciplinary literacy approaches in developmental literacy classes. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 45(1), 85–95. doi:10.1080/10790195.2014.950876
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, K. L., & Scott-Clayton, J. (2011). Assessing developmental assessment in community colleges. Community College Review, 39(4), 327–351. doi:10.1177/0091552111426898
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D., Jankowski, N., Ikenberry, S. O., & Kinzie, J. (2014). Knowing what students know and can do: The current state of student learning outcomes assessment in U.S. colleges and universities. Champaign, IL: National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Retrieved from http://www.learningoutcomeassessment.org/documents/2013%20Survey%20Report%20Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lavonier, N. (2016). Evaluation of the effectiveness of remedial reading courses at community colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 40(6), 523–533. doi:10.1080/10668926.2015.1080200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesaux, N. K., Kieffer, M. J., Kelley, J. G., & Harris, J. R. (2014). Effects of academic vocabulary instruction for linguistically diverse adolescents: Evidence from a randomized field trial. American Educational Research Journal, 51(6), 1159–1194. doi:10.3102/0002831214532165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, C. A., Philippakos, Z. A., & Ianetta, M. (2015). Self-regulated strategy instruction in college developmental writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 855–867. doi:10.1037/edu0000011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. H., Reid, R., & Hagaman, J. L. (2012). Building comprehension in adolescents: Powerful strategies for improving reading and writing in content areas. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, N. S., & MacArthur, C. A. (2012). The effects of being a reader and of observing readers on fifth-grade students’ argumentative writing and revising. Reading and Writing: an Interdisciplinary Journal, 25(6), 1449–1478. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9327-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Governors’ Association and Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards: English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/
   Google Scholar
• Olinghouse, N. G., & Graham, S. (2009). The relationship between the discourse knowledge and the writing performance of elementary-grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 37–50. doi:10.1037/a0013462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olinghouse, N. G., Graham, S., & Gillespie, A. (2015). The relationship of discourse and topic knowledge to fifth graders’ writing performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 391–406. doi:10.1037/a0037549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perin, D., Bork, R. H., Peverly, S. T., & Mason, L. H. (2013). A contextualized curricular supplement for developmental reading and writing. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 43(2), 8–38. (Instructional units used in this study available from the first author). doi:10.1080/10790195.2013.10850365
   Google Scholar
• Perin, D., Raufman, J. R., & Kalamkarian, H. S. (2016). Developmental reading and English assessment in a researcher-practitioner partnership (CCRC Working Paper No. 85). New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University. Retrieved from http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/publications/developmental-reading-english-assessment-researcher-practitioner-partnership.html
   Google Scholar
• Plakans, L. (2008). Comparing composing processes in writing-only and reading-to-write test tasks. Assessing Writing, 13(2), 111–129. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Plakans, L., & Gebrilb, A. (2012). A close investigation into source use in integrated second language writing tasks. Assessing Writing, 17(1), 18–34. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Rebuschat, P. (2013). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge in second language research. Language Learning, 63(3), 595–626. doi:10.1111/lang.12010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, C., Shanahan, T., & Misischia, C. (2011). Analysis of expert readers in three disciplines: History, mathematics, and chemistry. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 393–429. doi:10.1177/1086296X11424071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, P. (2001). Rethinking protocol analysis from a cultural perspective. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 233–245. doi:10.1017/S0267190501000149
   Google Scholar
• Solé, I., Miras, M., Castells, N., Espino, S., & Minguela, M. (2013). Integrating information: An analysis of the processes involved and the products generated in a written synthesis task. Written Communication, 30(1), 63–90. doi:10.1177/0741088312466532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffler, D. J., Varnhagen, C. K., Friesen, C. K., & Treiman, R. (1998). There’s more to children’s spelling than the errors they make: Strategic and automatic processes for one-syllable words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 492–505. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiede, K. W., Griffin, T. D., Wiley, J., & Anderson, M. C. M. (2010). Poor metacomprehension accuracy as a result of inappropriate cue use. Discourse Processes, 47(4), 331–362. doi:10.1080/01638530902959927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Blerkom, M. L., & Van Blerkom, D. L. (2004). Self-monitoring strategies used by developmental and non-developmental college students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 34(2), 45–60. doi:10.1080/10790195.2004.10850161
   Google Scholar
• Westby, C., Culatta, B., Lawrence, B., & Hall-Kenyon, K. (2010). Summarizing expository texts. Topics in Language Disorders, 30(4), 275–287. doi:10.1097/TLD.0b013e3181ff5a88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, J., Cormier, E., & Pickett-Hauber, R. (2010). Cognitions associated with nurse performance: A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal reports of nurse performance in a simulated task environment. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(4), 446–451. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, C. R. (2011). Argumentation across the curriculum. Written Communication, 28(1), 193–219. doi:10.1177/0741088311399236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement and tests of cognitive abilities. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
   Google Scholar