From Little Seeds Grow Mighty Trees: Transforming Teacher Preparation Literacy Methods’ Courses during the 2020 Pandemic

References

• Alexander, B., Ashford-Rowe, K., Barajas-Murphy, N., Dobbin, G., Knott, J., McCormack, M., Pomerantz, J., Seilhamer, R., & Weber, N. (2019). Educause Horizon report: 2019 Higher education edition. Educause.
   Google Scholar
• Beers, K., & Probst, R. (2012). Notice and note: Strategies for close reading. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. ISTE.
   Google Scholar
• Carspecken, P. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Castro, S. (2018). Google forms quizzes and substitution, augmentation, modification, and Redefinition (SAMR) model integration. Issues and Trends in Educational Technology, 6(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_itet_v6i2_castro
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, H. (2002). Literature circles: Voice and choice in book clubs & reading groups (2nd ed.). Stenhouse.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, B. (2016). Teaching and learning in the global village: Connect, create, collaborate, and communicate. The Reading Teacher, 70(1), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enfield, J. (2013, November/December). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. Tech Trends, 57(6), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0698-1
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2014). Contingency teaching during close reading. The Reading Teacher, 68(4), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2015). Checking for understanding digitally during content area learning. The Reading Teacher, 69(3), 281–286. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, P. (2005). Alas, Babylon (1946). Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, E. (2018). Academic praise in conferences: A key for motivating struggling writers. The Reading Teacher, 71(6), 651–658. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Society for Technology in Education. (n.d.). ISTE policy principles. ISTE. https://www.iste.org/advocacy/advocacy-platform
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B. B. (1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649509526885
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H., Howland, J., Moore, J., & Marra, R. M. (2003). Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective (2nd ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• King, J., & South, J. (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in higher education: A supplement to the national education technology plan. US Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70. https://citejournal.org/volume-9/issue-1-09/general/what-is-technological-pedagogicalcontent-knowledge/
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, J., & Gong, Y. (2010). 21st century paradigms for pre-service teacher technology preparation. Computers in the Schools, 27(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380560903536272
   Google Scholar
• Larson, L. C. (2008). Electronic reading workshop: Beyond books with new literacies and instructional technologies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(2), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.52.2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemov, D. (2020). Teaching in the online classroom: Surviving and thriving in the new normal. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Jones, R., & Lunsford, A. A. (1989). The English coalition conference: Democracy through language. National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Moses, L., Ogden, M., & Beth Kelly, L. (2015). Facilitating meaningful discussion groups in the primary grades. The Reading Teacher, 69(2), 233–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Standards for Quality. (2019). National standards for quality teaching. National Standards for Quality. https://www.nsqol.org/the-standards/quality-online-teaching/
   Google Scholar
• Network, F. L. (2014). Definition of flipped learning. Flipped Learning Network. Retrieved February 18, 2022, from https://flippedlearning.org/definition-of-flipped-learning/
   Google Scholar
• Petty, G. (2014). Evidence-based teaching (2nd) ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, B. (2010). Where’s the beef? Adding rigor to student digital products. Learning & Leading with Technology, 38(2), 14–17. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ899185.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Puentedura, R. R. (2006, November 28). Transformation, technology, and education in the state of Maine. Ruben R. Puentedura’s Web Log. http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2006_11.html
   Google Scholar
• Puentedura, R. R. (2014). SAMR: A contextualized introduction. Lecture at Pine Cobble School, Ruben R. Puentedura’s Web Log. http://hippasus.com/blog/archives/117.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, R. K. (2019). Effective constructivist teaching learning in the classroom. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 7(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v7i4.600
   Google Scholar
• Sylvester, R., & Greenidge, W. L. (2009). Digital storytelling: Extending the potential for struggling writers. The Reading Teacher, 63(4), 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.63.4.3
   Google Scholar
• Terada, Y. (2020). A powerful model for understanding good tech integration. Retrieved May, 12, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Zawilinski, L. M., Richard, K. A., & Henry, L. A. (2015). Inverting instruction in literacy methods courses: Making learning more active and personalized. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 59(6), 695–708. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar