Contextualizing the lived experience of quality of life for persons with spinal cord injury: A mixed-methods application of the response shift model

References

• Boschen KA, Tonack M, Gargaro J. Long-term adjustment and community reintegration following spinal cord injury. Int J Rehabil Res 2003;26(3):157–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitz A, Tobe V, Knapp P, Schurch B. Impact of spinal cord injury on sexual health and quality of life. Int J Impot Res 2004;16(2):167–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate DG, Kalpakjian CZ, Forchheimer MB. Quality of life issues in individuals with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:S18–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz HA, Lysack C, Luborsky MR, Messinger SD. Long-term community reintegration: concepts, outcomes and dilemmas in the case of a military service member with a spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 2015;37(16):1501–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusilla-Palacios P, Castellano-Tejedor C, Navarro-Sanchís JA, et al. Training professionals’ communication and motivation skills to improve spinal cord injury patients’ satisfaction and clinical outcomes: study protocol of the ESPELMA trial. J Health Psychol 2015;20(10):1357–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulsky DS, Kisala PA, Victorson D, Tate D, Heinemann AW, Amtmann D, et al. Developing a contemporary patient-reported outcomes measure for spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92(10):S44–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker RN, Kendall M, Amsters D, Pershouse KJ, Haines TP, Kuipers P. The relationship between quality of life and disability across the lifespan for people with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2009;47(2):149–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers MP. Quality of life of individuals with spinal cord injury: a review of conceptualization, measurement, and research findings. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005;42(3):87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidal IB, Veenstra M, Hjeltnes N, Biering-Sørensen F. Health-related quality of life in persons with long-standing spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2008;46(11):710–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson LA, Eng JJ, Hsieh JT, Wolfe, the spinal cord injury rehabilitation evidence research team DL. The health and life priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Neurotrauma 2012;29(8):1548–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz CE, Finkelstein JA. Understanding inconsistencies in patient-reported outcomes after spine treatment: response shift phenomena. Spine J 2009;9(12):1039–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause JS, Saladin LK, Adkins RH. Disparities in subjective well-being, participation, and health after spinal cord injury: a 6-year longitudinal study. Neurorehabilitation 2009;24(1):47–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate DG, Forchheimer MB, Karana-Zebari D, Chiodo AE, Kendall Thomas JY. Depression and pain among inpatients with spinal cord injury and spinal cord disease: differences in symptoms and neurological function. Disabil Rehabil 2013;35(14):1204–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron AP, Wallner LP, Forchheimer MB, Clemens JQ, Dunn RL, Rodriguez G, et al. Medical and psychosocial complications associated with method of bladder management after traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92(3):449–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullrich PM, Lincoln RK, Tackett MJ, Miskevics S, Smith BM, Weaver FM. Pain, depression, and health care utilization over time after spinal cord injury. Rehabil Psychol 2013;58(2):158–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coggrave M, Norton C, Wilson-Barnett J. Management of neurogenic bowel dysfunction in the community after spinal cord injury: a postal survey in the United Kingdom. Spinal Cord 2009;47(4):323–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prysak GM, Andresen EM, Meyers AR. Prevalence of secondary conditions in veterans with spinal cord injury and their interference with life activities. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2000;6(1):34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Tate DG, Forchheimer M, Rodriguez G, et al. Risk factors associated with neurogenic bowel complications and dysfunction in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016;97(10):1679–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faaborg PM, Christensen P, Finnerup N, Laurberg S, Krogh K. The pattern of colorectal dysfunction changes with time since spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2008;46(3):234–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns AS, St-Germain D, Connolly M, Delparte JJ, Guindon A, Hitzig SL, et al. Neurogenic bowel after spinal cord injury from the perspective of support providers: a phenomenological study. PM R 2015;7:407–16.
   Google Scholar
• Engkasan J, Ng C, Low W. Factors influencing bladder management in male patients with spinal cord injury: a qualitative study. Spinal Cord 2014;52(2):157–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munce SE, Webster F, Fehlings MG, Straus SE, Jang E, Jaglal SB. Perceived facilitators and barriers to self-management in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury: a qualitative descriptive study. BMC Neurol 2014;14:48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicken BL, Putzke JD, Richards JS. Bladder management and quality of life after spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80(12):916–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlifue S, Post M, Biering-Sørensen F, Catz A, Dijkers M, Geyh S, et al. International spinal cord injury quality of life basic data set. Spinal Cord 2012;50(9):672–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson J, Carlson M, Rubayi S, Scott MD, Atkins MS, Blanche EI, et al. Qualitative study of principles pertaining to lifestyle and pressure ulcer risk in adults with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32(7):567–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munce SE, Webster F, Fehlings MG, Straus SE, Jang E, Jaglal SB. Perceived facilitators and barriers to self-management in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury: a qualitative descriptive study. BMC Neurol 2014;14(1):1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammell KW. Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Spinal Cord 2007;45(2):124–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapkin BD, Schwartz CE. Toward a theoretical model of quality-of-life appraisal: implications of findings from studies of response shift. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004;2(1):1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer Publishing. 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz CE, Sprangers MA. Adaptation to changing health: response shift in quality-of-life research American Psychological Association; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Sprangers MA, Schwartz CE. Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model. Soc Sci Med 1999;48(11):1507–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz CE. Applications of response shift theory and methods to participation measurement: a brief history of a young field. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91(9):S38–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NVivo 11 [computer program] [computer program]. Version 11. Doncaster, Victoria, Australia: QSR International; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Tate DG, Forchheimer M, Hartwig R, Kalpakjian C. The bowel and bladder treatment index (BBTI): a new tool to assess bowel and bladder management in SCI. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015;96(10):e24–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forchheimer M, Meade MA, Tate D, Cameron AP, Rodriguez G, DiPonio L. Self-Report of behaviors to manage neurogenic bowel and bladder by individuals with chronic spinal cord injury: frequency and associated outcomes. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2016;22(2):85–98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, Gershon R, Cook K, Reeve B, et al. The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care 2007;45(5 Suppl 1):S3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42(2):377–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPSS Statistics for Windows [computer program] [computer program]. Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard HR. Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lequerica AH, Forchheimer M, Albright KJ, Tate DG, Duggan CH, Rahman RO. Stress appraisal in women with spinal cord injury: supplementary findings through mixed methods. Int J Stress Manag 2010;17(3):259–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luborsky MR. The identification and analysis of themes and patterns. 1994. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232539481_The_Identification_and_Analysis_of_Themes_and_Patterns
   Google Scholar
• Ryan GW, Bernard HR. Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods 2003;15(1):85–109.
   Google Scholar