Perspectives and recommendations of individuals with tetraplegia regarding wearable cameras for monitoring hand function at home: Insights from a community-based study

References

• Fougeyrollas P, Noreau L. Long-term consequences of spinal cord injury on social participation: the occurrence of handicap situations. Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22(4):170–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter C, Forwell SJ, Jongbloed LE, Backman CL. Community participation after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88(4):427–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma 2004;21(10):1371–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snoek GJ, Ijzerman MJ, Hermens HJ, Maxwell D, Biering-Sorensen F. Survey of the needs of patients with spinal cord injury: impact and priority for improvement in hand function in tetraplegics. Spinal Cord 2004;42(9):526–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Occupational Therapy Association. Framework: domain & process. Am J Occup Ther 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Munce SEP, Wodchis WP, Guilcher SJT, Couris CM, Verrier M, Fung K, et al. Direct costs of adult traumatic spinal cord injury in ontario. Spinal Cord 2013;51(1):64–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns AS, Yee J, Flett HM, Guy K, Cournoyea N. Impact of benchmarking and clinical decision making tools on rehabilitation length of stay following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2013;51(2):165–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns AS, Ditunno JF. Establishing prognosis and maximizing functional outcomes after spinal cord injury: A review of current and future directions in rehabilitation management. Spine 2001;26(24S):S137–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell KJ, Strube MJ, Bailey RR, Klaesner JW, Birkenmeier RL, Dromerick AW, et al. Does task-specific training improve upper limb performance in daily life poststroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2017;31(3):290–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craven C, Verrier M, Balioussis C, Wolfe D, Hsieh J, Noonan V, et al. Rehabilitation environmental scan atlas: capturing capacity in Canadian SCI rehabilitation. Rick Hansen Inst 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bell A, Grampurohit N, Marino RJ, Duff S, Kaplan G, Calhoun Thielen C, et al. Home activity-based interventions for the neurologically impaired upper extremity: a scoping review. Home Health Care Manage Practice 2020:1084822320953836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel S, Hughes R, Hester T, Stein J, Akay M, Dy JG, et al. A novel approach to monitor rehabilitation outcomes in stroke survivors using wearable technology. Proc IEEE 2010;98(3):450–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh H, Musselman K, Colella TJF, McGilton KS, Iaboni A, Bayley M, et al. Exploring the perspectives of outpatient rehabilitation clinicians on the challenges with monitoring patient health, function and activity in the community. Disabil Rehabil 2020:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noorkõiv M, Rodgers H, Price CI. Accelerometer measurement of upper extremity movement after stroke: A systematic review of clinical studies. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2014;11(1):1–1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brogioli M, Schneider S, Popp WL, Albisser U, Brust AK, Velstra IM, et al. Monitoring upper limb recovery after cervical spinal cord injury: insights beyond assessment scores. Front Neurol 2016;7:142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popp WL, Brogioli M, Leuenberger K, Albisser U, Frotzler A, Curt A, et al. A novel algorithm for detecting active propulsion in wheelchair users following spinal cord injury. Med Eng Phys 2016;38(3):267–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman N, Rowe JB, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Bachman M. The manumeter: a wearable device for monitoring daily use of the wrist and fingers. IEEE J Biomed Heal Informatics 2014;18(6):1804–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oess NP, Wanek J, Curt A. Design and evaluation of a low-cost instrumented glove for hand function assessment. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2012;9(1):1–1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lum PS, Shu L, Bochniewicz EM, Tran T, Chang LC, Barth J, et al. Improving accelerometry-based measurement of functional use of the upper extremity after stroke: machine learning versus counts threshold method. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2020;34(12):1078–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandini A, Zariffa J. Analysis of the hands in egocentric vision: a survey. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell [Internet] 2020: 1–1. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9064606/.
   Google Scholar
• Dousty M, Zariffa J. Tenodesis grasp detection in egocentric video. IEEE J Biomed Heal Informatics 2020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visee RJ, Likitlersuang J, Zariffa J. An effective and efficient method for detecting hands in egocentric videos for rehabilitation applications. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2020;28(3):748–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likitlersuang J, Sumitro ER, Cao T, Visée RJ, Kalsi-Ryan S, Zariffa J. Egocentric video: a new tool for capturing hand use of individuals with spinal cord injury at home. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2019;16(1):1–1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen THC, Nebel JC, Florez-Revuelta F. Recognition of activities of daily living with egocentric vision: a review. Sensors (Switzerland) 2016;16(1):72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinnis PQ, Hack LM, Nixon-Cave K, Michlovitz SL. Factors that influence the clinical decision making of physical therapists in choosing a balance assessment approach. Phys Ther 2009;89(3):233–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likitlersuang J, Zariffa J. Interaction detection in egocentric video: toward a novel outcome measure for upper extremity function. IEEE J Biomed Heal Informat 2018;22(2):561–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandini A, Dousty M, Zariffa J. A wearable vision-based system for detecting hand-object interactions in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury: first results in the home environment. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS; 2020 (pp. 2159–2162).
   Google Scholar
• Gelonch O, Ribera M, Codern-Bové N, Ramos S, Quintana M, Chico G, et al. Acceptability of a lifelogging wearable camera in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a mixed-method study. BMC Geriatr 2019;19(1):1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta R, Crane M, Gurrin C. Considerations on privacy in the era of digitally logged lives. Online Inf Rev 2021;45(2):278–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likitlersuang J, Sumitro ER, Theventhiran P, Kalsi-Ryan S, Zariffa J. Views of individuals with spinal cord injury on the use of wearable cameras to monitor upper limb function in the home and community. J Spinal Cord Med 2017;40(6):706–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likitlersuang J, Visée RJ, Kalsi-Ryan S, Zariffa J. Capturing hand use of individuals with spinal cord injury at home using egocentric video: A feasibility study. Spinal Cord Series and Cases. 2021;7(1):1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Catz A, Itzkovich M, Tesio L, Biering-Sorensen F, Weeks C, Laramee MT, et al. A multicenter international study on the spinal cord independence measure, version III: rasch psychometric validation. Spinal Cord 2007;45(4):275–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalsi-Ryan S, Beaton D, Curt A, Duff S, Popovic MR, Rudhe C, et al. The graded redefined assessment of strength sensibility and prehension: reliability and validity. J Neurotrauma 2012;29(5):905–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirshblum SC, Waring W, Biering-Sorensen F, Burns SP, Johansen M, Schmidt-Read M, et al. Reference for the 2011 revision of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Medi 2011;34(6):547–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai M-F, Bandini A, Wang RH, Zariffa J. Capturing representative hand Use at home using egocentric video in individuals with upper limb impairment. J Vis Exp 2020;166:e61898.
   Google Scholar
• Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009;4(1):1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisdom J, Creswell JW. Integrating quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis while studying patient-centered medical home models. Agency Healthc Res Qual 2013:13–0028.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004;24(2):105–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications; 2017 Nov 27.
   Google Scholar
• Uittenbogaard R, Sebastian C, Vijverberg J, Boom B, Gavrila DM, De With PHN. Privacy protection in street-view panoramas using depth and multi-view imagery. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; 2019 (pp. 10581–10590).
   Google Scholar
• Fan L. Practical image obfuscation with provable privacy. In: Proceedings – IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo; 2019 (pp. 784–789).
   Google Scholar