Development of employment indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation care: SCI-High Project

References

• Ramakrishnan K, Mazlan M, Julia PE, Abdul Latif L. Return to work after spinal cord injury: factors related to time to first job. Spinal Cord 2011;49(8):924–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez W. How science and technology developments impact employment and education. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2018;115(50):12624–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinal cord injury facts and figures at a glance. J Spinal Cord Med 2012;35(4):197–8.
   Google Scholar
• Jetha A, Dumont FS, Noreau L, Leblond J. A life course perspective to spinal cord injury and employment participation in Canada. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2014;20(4):310–320.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sinden KE, Martin Ginis KA, Group S-SR. Identifying occupational attributes of jobs performed after spinal cord injury: implications for vocational rehabilitation. Int J Rehabil Res 2013;36(3):196–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramakrishnan K, Loh SY, Omar Z. Earnings among people with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2011;49(9):986–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post MW, van Leeuwen CM. Psychosocial issues in spinal cord injury: a review. Spinal Cord 2012;50(5):382–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause JS, Saunders LL, DeVivo MJ. Income and risk of mortality after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92(3):339–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah MM, Fossey E, Stuckey R. The meaning of work after spinal cord injury: a scoping review. Spinal Cord 2018;56(2):92–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmark L, Westgren N, Asaba E. Returning to work after spinal cord injury: exploring young adults’ early expectations and experience. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33(25-26):2553–2558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramakrishnan K, Johnston D, Garth B, Murphy G, Middleton J, Cameron I. Early access to vocational rehabilitation for inpatients with spinal cord injury: a qualitative study of patients’ perceptions. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2016;22(3):183–191.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braathen TN, Brage S, Tellnes G, Irene O, Chris J, Eftedal M. A prospective study of the association between the readiness for return to work scale and future work participation in Norway. J Occup Rehabil 2014;24(4):650–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw WS, Huang YH. Concerns and expectations about returning to work with low back pain: identifying themes from focus groups and semi-structured interviews. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27(21):1269–1281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trenaman L, Miller WC, Queree M, Escorpizo R, Team SR. Modifiable and non-modifiable factors associated with employment outcomes following spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Spinal Cord Med 2015;38(4):422–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy GC, Young AE, Brown DJ, King NJ. Explaining labor force status following spinal cord injury: the contribution of psychological variables. J Rehabil Med 2003;35(6):276–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan SK, Man DW. Barriers to returning to work for people with spinal cord injuries: a focus group study. Work 2005;25(4):325–332.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leiulfsrud AS, Solheim EF, Reinhardt JD, Post MWM, Horsewell J, Biering-Sorensen F, et al. Gender, class, employment status and social mobility following spinal cord injury in Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway and Switzerland. Spinal Cord 2020;58(2):224–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang Y, Wang YH, Wang JD. Return to work after spinal cord injury in Taiwan: the contribution of functional independence. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86(4):681–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Praxis Spinal Cord Institute. Rick Hansen spinal cord injury registry- a look at traumatic spinal cord injury in Canada in 2018. Praxis: Vancouver; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Trenaman LM, Miller WC, Escorpizo R, Team SR. Interventions for improving employment outcomes among individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord 2014;52(11):788–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomassen PC, Post MW, van Asbeck FW. Return to work after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2000;38(1):51–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franche RL, Krause N. Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. J Occup Rehabil 2002;12(4):233–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottomanelli L, Lind L. Review of critical factors related to employment after spinal cord injury: implications for research and vocational services. J Spinal Cord Med 2009;32(5):503–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini I, Lee GK, Chan F, Chapin MH, Romero MG. Vocational rehabilitation service patterns related to successful competitive employment outcomes of persons with spinal cord injury. J Vocat Rehabil 2008;28:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Escorpizo R, Reneman MF, Ekholm J, Fritz J, Krupa T, Marnetoft SU, et al. A conceptual definition of vocational rehabilitation based on the ICF: building a shared global model. J Occup Rehabil 2011;21(2):126–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gard G, Soderberg S. How can a work rehabilitation process be improved?–a qualitative study from the perspective of social insurance officers. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26(5):299–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jetha A, McCauley D, Athanasopoulos P, Howatt S, Craven BC. Employment & vocation. In: Rehabilitation environmental scan Atlas: capturing capacity in Canadian SCI rehabilitation. Vancouver: Rick Hansen Institute; 2012. p. 177–184.
   Google Scholar
• Jongbloed L, Backman C, Forwell SJ, Carpenter C. Employment after spinal cord injury: the impact of government policies in Canada. Work 2007;29(2):145–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mainz J. Developing evidence-based clinical indicators: a state of the art methods primer. Int J Qual Health Care 2003;15(Suppl 1):5i–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idvall E, Rooke L, Hamrin E. Quality indicators in clinical nursing: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs 1997;25(1):6–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selim AJ, Berlowitz DR, Fincke G, Rosen AK, Ren XS, Christiansen CL, et al. Risk-adjusted mortality rates as a potential outcome indicator for outpatient quality assessments. Med Care 2002;40(3):237–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craven BC, Alavinia SM, Wiest MJ, Farahani F, Hitzig SL, Flett H, et al. Methods for development of structure, process and outcome indicators for prioritized spinal cord injury rehabilitation domains: SCI-High project. J Spinal Cord Med 2019;42(sup1):51–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alavinia SM, Hitzig SL, Farahani F, Flett H, Bayley M, Craven BC. Prioritization of rehabilitation domains for establishing spinal cord injury high performance indicators using a modification of the Hanlon method: SCI-high project. J Spinal Cord Med 2019;42(sup1):43–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alavinia SM, Hitzig SL, Farahani F, Flett H, Bayley M, Craven BC. Prioritization of rehabilitation domains for establishing spinal cord injury high performance indicators using a modification of the Hanlon method: SCI-high project. J Spinal Cord Med 2019;42(sup1):43–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitzig SL, Jeyathevan G, Farahani F, Linassi G, Routhier F, Jetha A, et al. Development of community participation indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-high project. J Spinal Cord Med 2021 [Forthcoming in this special issue].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr JJ, Kendall MB, Amsters DI, Pershouse KJ, Kuipers P, Buettner P, et al. Community participation for individuals with spinal cord injury living in Queensland, Australia. Spinal Cord 2017;55(2):192–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips J, Simmonds L. Using fishbone analysis to investigate problems. Nurs Times 2013;109(15):18–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jetha A, Pransky G, Hettinger LJ. Capturing complexity in work disability research: application of system dynamics modeling methodology. Disabil Rehabil 2016;38(2):189–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franche RL, Corbiere M, Lee H, Breslin FC, Hepburn CG. The readiness for Return-To-Work (RRTW) scale: development and validation of a self-report staging scale in lost-time claimants with musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil 2007;17(3):450–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braathen TN, Brage S, Tellnes G, Eftedal M. Psychometric properties of the readiness for return to work scale in inpatient occupational rehabilitation in Norway. J Occup Rehabil 2013;23(3):371–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fekete C, Wahrendorf M, Reinhardt JD, Post MW, Siegrist J. Work stress and quality of life in persons with disabilities from four European countries: the case of spinal cord injury. Qual Life Res 2014;23(5):1661–1671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordway AR, Johnson KL, Amtmann D, Bocell FD, Jensen MP, Molton IR. The relationship between resilience, self-efficacy, and employment in people with physical disabilities. Rehabil Couns Bull 2020;63(4):195–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist J, Starke D, Chandola T, Godin I, Marmot M, Niedhammer I, et al. The measurement of effort–reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Soc Sci Med 2004;58(8):1483–1499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidal IB, Huynh TK, Biering-Sorensen F. Return to work following spinal cord injury: a review. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29(17):1341–1375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Bansback N, Boonen A, Young A, Singh A, Anis AH. Validity of the work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire–general health version in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2010;12(5):R177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Blanc PD, Hayden ML, Bleecker ER, Chawla A, Lee JH, et al. Assessing productivity loss and activity impairment in severe or difficult-to-treat asthma. Value Health 2008;11(2):231–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly MC, Bracco A, Ricci JF, Santoro J, Stevens T. The validity and accuracy of the work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire–irritable bowel syndrome version (WPAI:IBS). Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;20(4):459–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly MC, Zbrozek AS, Dukes EM. The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument. Pharmacoeconomics 1993;4(5):353–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmlund L, Guidetti S, Eriksson G, Asaba E. Return-to-work: exploring professionals’ experiences of support for persons with spinal cord injury. Scand J Occup Ther 2020: 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisp R. Vocational decision making by sixty spinal cord injury patients. Paraplegia 1992;30(6):420–424.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Neill J, Dyson-Hudson TA. Employment after spinal cord injury. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep 2020;8(3):141–148.
   Google Scholar
• Horn SD, Gassaway J. Practice based evidence: incorporating clinical heterogeneity and patient-reported outcomes for comparative effectiveness research. Med Care 2010;48(6 Suppl):S17–S22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Krause JS. The association between secondary health conditions and indirect costs after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2021;59(3):306–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jetha A, Shamaee A, Bonaccio S, Gignac MAM, Tucker LB, Tompa E, et al. Fragmentation in the future of work: a horizon scan examining the impact of the changing nature of work on workers experiencing vulnerability. Am J Ind Med. 2021;64(8):649–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coronavirus: The risks to essential workers with hidden health conditions [Internet]. 2020. Available from https://theconversation.com/coronavirus-the-risks-to-essential-workers-with-hidden-health-conditions-135819.
   Google Scholar
• Accessibility Standards Canada [Internet]. Available from https://accessible.canada.ca/.
   Google Scholar
• Coronavirus: How the world of work may change forever [Internet]. BBC. Available from https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20201023-coronavirus-how-will-the-pandemic-change-the-way-we-work.
   Google Scholar
• Unpublished data. Vancouver: Praxis Spinal Cord Institute. Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Ottomanelli L, Barnett SD, Goetz LL, Toscano R. Vocational rehabilitation in spinal cord injury: what vocational service activities are associated with employment program outcome? Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2015;21(1):31–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stanhope J. Effort–reward imbalance questionnaire. Occup Med 2017;67(4):314–315.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer S, Franche RL, Hogg-Johnson S, Lee H, Krause N, Shaw WS. Return-to-work self-efficacy: development and validation of a scale in claimants with musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil 2011;21(2):244–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang K, Beaton DE, Boonen A, Gignac MA, Bombardier C. Measures of work disability and productivity: Rheumatoid Arthritis Specific Work Productivity Survey (WPS-RA), Workplace Activity Limitations Scale (WALS), Work Instability Scale for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA-WIS), Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63(Suppl 11):S337–S349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Tang K, Gignac MA, Lacaille D, Badley EM, Anis AH, et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of five at-work productivity measures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010;62(1):28–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revicki D, Ganguli A, Kimel M, Roy S, Chen N, Safikhani S, et al. Reliability and validity of the work instability scale for rheumatoid arthritis. Value Health 2015;18(8):1008–1015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner D, Reed JI, Massarotti E, Wester LM, Burke TA. The work limitations questionnaire's validity and reliability among patients with osteoarthritis. J Clin Epidemiol 2002;55(2):197–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abma F, Bjorner JB, Amick BC, 3rd, Bultmann U. Two valid and reliable work role functioning questionnaire short versions were developed: WRFQ 5 and WRFQ 10. J Clin Epidemiol 2019;105:101–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abma FI, Bultmann U, Amick III BC, Arends I, Dorland HF, Flach PA, et al. The work role functioning questionnaire v2.0 showed consistent factor structure across six working samples. J Occup Rehabil 2018;28(3):465–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar