1,747
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Development of Reaching, Grasping & Manipulation indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all

References

  • Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma 2004;21(10):1371–83.
  • New PW, Cripps RA, Bonne Lee B. Global maps of non-traumatic spinal cord injury epidemiology: towards a living data repository. Spinal Cord 2014;52(2):97–109.
  • Kalsi-Ryan S, Riehm LE, Tetreault L, Martin AR, Teoderascu F, Massicotte E, et al. Characteristics of upper limb impairment related to degenerative cervical myelopathy: development of a sensitive hand assessment (Graded redefined assessment of strength, sensibility, and prehension version myelopathy). Neurosurgery 2020;86(3):E292–E9.
  • Tetreault L, Kopjar B, Nouri A, Arnold P, Barbagallo G, Bartels R, et al. The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale: establishing criteria for mild, moderate and severe impairment in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Eur Spine J 2017;26(1):78–84.
  • Ho C, Guilcher SJT, McKenzie N, Mouneimne M, Williams A, Voth J, et al. Validation of algorithm to identify persons with non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction in Canada using Administrative Health Data. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2017;23(4):333–42.
  • Guilcher SJ, Munce SE, Couris CM, Fung K, Craven BC, Verrier M, et al. Health care utilization in non-traumatic and traumatic spinal cord injury: a population-based study. Spinal Cord 2010;48(1):45–50.
  • Noonan VK, Fingas M, Farry A, Baxter D, Singh A, Fehlings MG, et al. Incidence and prevalence of spinal cord injury in Canada: a national perspective. Neuroepidemiology 2012;38(4):219–26.
  • Lu X, Battistuzzo CR, Zoghi M, Galea MP. Effects of training on upper limb function after cervical spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2015;29(1):3–13.
  • Boninger ML, Koontz AM, Sisto SA, Dyson-Hudson TA, Chang M, Price R, et al. Pushrim biomechanics and injury prevention in spinal cord injury: recommendations based on CULP-SCI investigations. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005;42(3 Suppl 1):9–19.
  • Simpson LA, Eng JJ, Hsieh JT, Wolfe DL. Spinal Cord injury Rehabilitation Evidence Scire Research T. The health and life priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Neurotrauma 2012;29(8):1548–55.
  • Miyanji F, Furlan JC, Aarabi B, Arnold PM, Fehlings MG. Acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury: MR imaging findings correlated with neurologic outcome--prospective study with 100 consecutive patients. Radiology 2007;243(3):820–7.
  • Martin AR, et al. Clinical outcomes of nonoperatively managed degenerative cervical myelopathy: an ambispective longitudinal cohort study in 117 patients” has been accepted for publication in the Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. In Press.
  • Kalsi-Ryan S, Beaton D, Curt A, Popovic MR, Verrier MC, Fehlings MG. Outcome of the upper limb in cervical spinal cord injury: profiles of recovery and insights for clinical studies. J Spinal Cord Med 2014;37(5):503–10.
  • Tanadini LG, Steeves JD, Hothorn T, Abel R, Maier D, Schubert M, et al. identifying homogeneous subgroups in neurological disorders: unbiased recursive partitioning in cervical complete spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2014;28(6):507–15.
  • Velstra IM, Bolliger M, Tanadini LG, Baumberger M, Abel R, Rietman JS, et al. Prediction and stratification of upper limb function and self-care in acute cervical spinal cord injury with the graded redefined assessment of strength, sensibility, and prehension (GRASSP). Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2014;28(7):632–42.
  • Ditunno JF, J, Stover SL, Freed MM, Ahn JH. Motor recovery of the upper extremities in traumatic quadriplegia: a multicenter study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73(5):431–6.
  • Petersen JA, Spiess M, Curt A, Weidner N, Rupp R, Abel R, et al. Upper limb recovery in spinal cord injury: involvement of central and peripheral motor pathways. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2017;31(5):432–41.
  • Beekhuizen KS, Field-Fote EC. Sensory stimulation augments the effects of massed practice training in persons with tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89(4):602–8.
  • Dolbow DR, Gorgey AS, Recio AC, Stiens SA, Curry AC, Sadowsky CL, et al. Activity-based restorative therapies after spinal cord injury: inter-institutional conceptions and perceptions. Aging Dis 2015;6(4):254–61.
  • Hoffman L, Field-Fote E. Effects of practice combined with somatosensory or motor stimulation on hand function in persons with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2013;19(4):288–99.
  • Kapadia N, Masani K, Catharine Craven B, Giangregorio LM, Hitzig SL, Richards K, et al. A randomized trial of functional electrical stimulation for walking in incomplete spinal cord injury: Effects on walking competency. J Spinal Cord Med 2014;37(5):511–24.
  • Kapadia NM, Zivanovic V, Furlan JC, Craven BC, McGillivray C, Popovic MR. Functional electrical stimulation therapy for grasping in traumatic incomplete spinal cord injury: randomized control trial. Artif Organs 2011;35(3):212–6.
  • Popovic MR, Kapadia N, Zivanovic V, Furlan JC, Craven BC, McGillivray C. Functional electrical stimulation therapy of voluntary grasping versus only conventional rehabilitation for patients with subacute incomplete tetraplegia: a randomized clinical trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011;25(5):433–42.
  • Burns AS, Yee J, Flett HM, Guy K, Cournoyea N. Impact of benchmarking and clinical decision making tools on rehabilitation length of stay following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2013;51(2):165–9.
  • Idvall E, Rooke L, Hamrin E. Quality indicators in clinical nursing: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs 1997;25(1):6–17.
  • Selim AJ, Berlowitz DR, Fincke G, Rosen AK, Ren XS, Christiansen CL, et al. Risk-adjusted mortality rates as a potential outcome indicator for outpatient quality assessments. Med Care 2002;40(3):237–45.
  • Mainz J. Developing evidence-based clinical indicators: a state of the art methods primer. Int J Qual Health Care 2003;15(Suppl 1):i5–11.
  • Rubin HR, Pronovost P, Diette GB. The advantages and disadvantages of process-based measures of health care quality. Int J Qual Health Care 2001;13(6):469–74.
  • Alavinia SM, Hitzig SL, Farahani F, Flett H, Bayley M, Craven BC. Prioritization of rehabilitation Domains for establishing spinal cord injury high performance indicators using a modification of the hanlon method: SCI-High project. The J Spinal Cord Med 2019;42(sup1):43–50.
  • Craven BC, Alavinia SM, Wiest MJ, Farahani F, Hitzig SL, Flett H, et al. Methods for development of structure, process and outcome indicators for prioritized spinal cord injury rehabilitation domains: SCI-High project. J Spinal Cord Med 2019;42(sup1):51–67.
  • Phillips J SL. Change management tools part 1: using analysis to investigate problems. Nursing Times 2013;109:18–20.
  • Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD, Burnand B, LaCalle JR, Lazaro P, et al. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual. Santa Monica (CA): RAND Corporation; 2001; Available from https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1269.html.
  • Catz A, Greenberg E, Itzkovich M, Bluvshtein V, Ronen J, Gelernter I. A new instrument for outcome assessment in rehabilitation medicine: Spinal cord injury ability realization measurement index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85(3):399–404.
  • Kalsi-Ryan S, Beaton D, Ahn H, Askes H, Drew B, Curt A, et al. Responsiveness, sensitivity, and minimally detectable difference of the graded and redefined assessment of strength, sensibility, and prehension, version 1.0. J Neurotrauma 2016;33(3):307–14.
  • Kalsi-Ryan S, Beaton D, Curt A, Duff S, Popovic MR, Rudhe C, et al. The graded redefined assessment of strength sensibility and prehension: reliability and validity. J Neurotrauma 2012;29(5):905–14.
  • Kalsi-Ryan S, Curt A, Verrier MC, Fehlings MG. Development of the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP): reviewing measurement specific to the upper limb in tetraplegia. J Neurosurg Spine 2012;17(1 Suppl):65–76.
  • Kalsi-Ryan S, Riehm LE, Tetreault L, Martin AR, Teoderascu F, Massicotte E, et al. Characteristics of upper limb impairment related to degenerative cervical myelopathy: development of a sensitive hand assessment (graded redefined assessment of strength, sensibility, and prehension version myelopathy). Neurosurgery 2019;86(3):E292–E9.
  • Sollerman C, Ejeskar A. Sollerman hand function test. A standardised method and its use in tetraplegic patients. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1995;29(2):167–76.
  • Upper Limb Rehabilitation Following Spinal Cord Injury [Internet]. Available from https://scireproject.com/wp-content/uploads/SCIRE_Upper-limb_V7.pdf.
  • Fox IK, Miller AK, Curtin CM. Nerve and tendon transfer surgery in cervical spinal cord injury: individualized choices to optimize function. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2018;24(3):275–87.
  • Hill EJR, Fox IK. Current best peripheral nerve transfers for spinal cord injury. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;143(1):184e–98e.
  • Khorasanizadeh M, Yousefifard M, Eskian M, Lu Y, Chalangari M, Harrop JS, et al. Neurological recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 2019;15:1–17.
  • Swinkels RA, van Peppen RP, Wittink H, Custers JW, Beurskens AJ. Current use and barriers and facilitators for implementation of standardised measures in physical therapy in the Netherlands. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011;12:106.
  • Van Peppen RP, Maissan FJ, Van Genderen FR, Van Dolder R, Van Meeteren NL. Outcome measures in physiotherapy management of patients with stroke: a survey into self-reported use, and barriers to and facilitators for use. Physiother Res Int 2008;13(4):255–70.
  • Weissman NW, Allison JJ, Kiefe CI, Farmer RM, Weaver MT, Williams OD, et al. Achievable benchmarks of care: the ABCs of benchmarking. J Eval Clin Pract 1999;5(3):269–81.
  • Al Zoubi F, Mayo N, Rochette A, Thomas A. Applying modern measurement approaches to constructs relevant to evidence-based practice among Canadian physical and occupational therapists. Implement Sci 2018;13(1):152.
  • Buchanan H, Siegfried N, Jelsma J. Survey instruments for knowledge, skills, attitudes and behaviour related to evidence-based practice in occupational therapy: a systematic review. Occup Ther Int 2016;23(2):59–90.
  • Singh H, Unger J, Zariffa J, Pakosh M, Jaglal S, Craven BC, et al. Robot-assisted upper extremity rehabilitation for cervical spinal cord injuries: a systematic scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2018;13(7):704–15.
  • Craven BC, Verrier M, Balioussis C, Wolfe D, Hsieh J, Noonan V, et al. Rehabilitation environmental scan atlas: capturing capacity in Canadian SCI rehabilitation. Rick Hansen Institute; 2012. Available from http://rickhanseninstitute.org/images/stories/ESCAN/RHESCANATLAS2012WEB_2014.pdf
  • Shepherd RB. Some factors influencing the outcome of stroke rehabilitation. Aust J Physiother 1979;25(4):173–8.
  • von Zweck C. The promotion of evidence-based occupational therapy practice in Canada. Can J Occup Ther 1999;66(5):208–13.
  • Egan M, Dubouloz CJ, Von Zweck C, Vallerand J. The client-centred evidence-based practice of occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther 1998;65(3):136–43.
  • Law M, Baum C. Evidence-based occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther 1998;65(3):131–5.
  • Dubouloz CJ, Egan M, Vallerand J, Von Zweck C. Occupational therapists’ perceptions of evidence-based practice. The Am J Occup Ther: Official Publ Am Occup Ther Assoc 1999;53(5):445–53.
  • Kapadia NM, Bagher S, Popovic MR. Influence of different rehabilitation therapy models on patient outcomes: hand function therapy in individuals with incomplete SCI. J Spinal Cord Med 2014;37(6):734–43.
  • Leech KA, Hornby TG. High-intensity locomotor exercise increases brain-derived neurotrophic factor in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2017;34(6):1240–8.
  • Sehatzadeh S. Effect of increased intensity of physiotherapy on patient outcomes after stroke: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 2015;15(6):1–42.
  • Kalsi-Ryan S, Verrier MC. A synthesis of best evidence for the restoration of upper-extremity function in people with tetraplegia. Physiother Can 2011;63(4):474–89.
  • Wallace MA, Kendall MB. Transitional rehabilitation goals for people with spinal cord injury: looking beyond the hospital walls. Disabil Rehabil 2014;36(8):642–50.
  • FitzGerald C, Hurst S. Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMC Med Ethics 2017;18(1):19.
  • Catz A, Itzkovich M, Agranov E, Ring H, Tamir A. SCIM–spinal cord independence measure: a new disability scale for patients with spinal cord lesions. Spinal Cord 1997;35(12):850–6.
  • Fekete C, Eriks-Hoogland I, Baumberger M, Catz A, Itzkovich M, Luthi H, et al. Development and validation of a self-report version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III). Spinal Cord 2013;51(1):40–7.
  • Itzkovich M, Tripolski M, Zeilig G, Ring H, Rosentul N, Ronen J, et al. Rasch analysis of the Catz-Itzkovich spinal cord independence measure. Spinal Cord 2002;40(8):396–407.
  • Velstra IM, Curt A, Frotzler A, Abel R, Kalsi-Ryan S, Rietman JS, et al. Changes in strength, sensation, and prehension in acute cervical spinal cord injury: European multicenter responsiveness study of the GRASSP. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2015;29(8):755–66.
  • Kalsi-Ryan S, Beaton D, Curt A, Duff S, Jiang D, Popovic MR, et al. Defining the role of sensation, strength, and prehension for upper limb function in cervical spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2014;28(1):66–74.
  • Zariffa J, Curt A, Verrier MC, Fehlings MG, Kalsi-Ryan S, Team GC-SS, et al. Predicting task performance from upper extremity impairment measures after cervical spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2016;54(12):1145–51.
  • Kalsi-Ryan S, Curt A, Fehlings M, Verrier M. Assessment of the hand in tetraplegia using the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) impairment versus function. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2009;14(4):34–46.
  • Rowan CP, Chan BCF, Jaglal SB, Catharine Craven B. Describing the current state of post-rehabilitation health system surveillance in Ontario - an invited review. J Spinal Cord Med 2019;42(sup1):21–33.
  • Musselman KE, Verrier MC, Flett H, Nadeau S, Yang JF, Farahani F, et al. Development of walking indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High project. J Spinal Cord Med 2019;42(sup1):119–29.
  • Bayley MT, Kirby RL, Farahani F, Titus L, Smith C, Routhier F, et al. Development of wheeled mobility indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-high project. J Spinal Cord Med 2019;42(sup1):130–40.
  • Burns AS, Ditunno JF. Establishing prognosis and maximizing functional outcomes after spinal cord injury: a review of current and future directions in rehabilitation management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26(24 Suppl):S137–45.
  • Itzkovich M, Gelernter I, Biering-Sorensen F, Weeks C, Laramee MT, Craven BC, et al. The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III: reliability and validity in a multi-center international study. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29(24):1926–33.
  • Ozelie R, Gassaway J, Buchman E, Thimmaiah D, Heisler L, Cantoni K, et al. Relationship of occupational therapy inpatient rehabilitation interventions and patient characteristics to outcomes following spinal cord injury: the SCIRehab project. J Spinal Cord Med 2012;35(6):527–46.
  • Catharine Craven B, Kurban D, Farahani F, Rivers CS, Ho C, Linassi AG, et al. Predicting rehabilitation length of stay in Canada: it's not just about impairment. J Spinal Cord Med 2017;40(6):676–86.
  • Huang H, Chen L. Neurorestorative process, law, and mechanisms. J Neurorestoratology 2015;3:23–30.
  • Hall KM, Cohen ME, Wright J, Call M, Werner P. Characteristics of the functional independence measure in traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80(11):1471–6.
  • Stineman MG, Shea JA, Jette A, Tassoni CJ, Ottenbacher KJ, Fiedler R, et al. The functional independence measure: tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77(11):1101–8.
  • Mulcahey MJ, Smith BT, Betz RR. Psychometric rigor of the Grasp and Release Test for measuring functional limitation of persons with tetraplegia: a preliminary analysis. J Spinal Cord Med 2004;27(1):41–6.
  • Wuolle KS, Van Doren CL, Thrope GB, Keith MW, Peckham PH. Development of a quantitative hand grasp and release test for patients with tetraplegia using a hand neuroprosthesis. J Hand Surg Am 1994;19(2):209–18.
  • Gresham GE, Labi ML, Dittmar SS, Hicks JT, Joyce SZ, Stehlik MA. The Quadriplegia Index of Function (QIF): sensitivity and reliability demonstrated in a study of thirty quadriplegic patients. Paraplegia 1986;24(1):38–44.
  • Almeida C, Coelho JN, Riberto M. Applicability, validation and reproducibility of the spinal cord independence measure version III (SCIM III) in patients with non-traumatic spinal cord lesions. Disabil Rehabil 2016;38(22):2229–34.
  • Kapadia N, Zivanovic V, Verrier M, Popovic MR. Toronto rehabilitation institute-hand function test: assessment of gross motor function in individuals with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2012;18(2):167–86.
  • Post MW, Van Lieshout G, Seelen HA, Snoek GJ, Ijzerman MJ, Pons C. Measurement properties of the short version of the Van Lieshout test for arm/hand function of persons with tetraplegia after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2006;44(12):763–71.
  • Spooren AI, Janssen-Potten YJ, Post MW, Kerckhofs E, Nene A, Seelen HA. Measuring change in arm hand skilled performance in persons with a cervical spinal cord injury: responsiveness of the Van Lieshout Test. Spinal Cord 2006;44(12):772–9.