Fuzzy TOPSIS evaluation approach for business process management software acquisition

References

• Abdolvand, N., Albadvi, A., & Ferdowsi, Z. (2008). Assessing readiness for business process reengineering. Business Process Management Journal, 14, 497–511. 10.1108/14637150810888046
   Google Scholar
• Abecker, A., Hinkelmann, K., Maus, H., & Müller, H. J. (Eds.). (2013). Business-oriented knowledge management: Effective knowledge use in the planning and implementation of business processes. Springer-Verlag: New York City.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mudimigh, A.S. (2007). The role and impact of business process management in enterprise systems implementation. Business Process Management Journal, 13, 866–874. 10.1108/14637150710834604
   Google Scholar
• Amiri, M.P. (2010). Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 6218–6224. 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, C., & Rauber, A. (2010). Improving component selection and monitoring with controlled experimentation and automated measurements. Information and Software Technology, 52, 641–655. 10.1016/j.infsof.2010.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozdağ, C.E., Kahraman, C., & Ruan, D. (2003). Fuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systems. Computers in Industry, 51, 13–29. 10.1016/S0166-3615(03)00029-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büyüközkan, G., Feyzioğlu, O., & Nebol, E. (2008). Selection of the strategic alliance partner in logistics value chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 113, 148–158. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, D.J., & Wallnau, K.C. (1998). A basis for evaluation of commercial software. Information and Software Technology, 40, 851–860. 10.1016/S0950-5849(98)00099-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen, P.H., & Schmidt, K. (2003). Computer supported cooperative work. new challenges to systems design. In K. Itoh (Ed.), Handbook of human fac-tors/ergonomics (pp. 619–636). Tokyo: Asakura Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, F.T.S., & Kumar, N. (2007). Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega, 35, 417–431. 10.1016/j.omega.2005.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y.H., & Yeh, C.H. (2002). A survey analysis of service quality for domestic airlines. European Journal of Operational Research, 139, 166–177. 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00148-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y.H., Yeh, C.H., & Wang, S.Y. (2007). A survey and optimization-based evaluation of development strategies for the air cargo industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 106, 550–562. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T.Y., & Tsao, C.Y. (2008). The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 159, 1410–1428. 10.1016/j.fss.2007.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, C., & Lee, S. (2011). A study on process evaluation and selection model for business process management. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 6339–6350. 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, J.K., & Chen, H.N. (2005). Fuzzy multi-criteria selection of object-oriented simulation software for production system analysis. Computers & Operations Research, 32, 153–168. 10.1016/S0305-0548(03)00209-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, E., & Francalanci, C. (2004). Selecting CRM packages based on architectural, functional, and cost requirements: Empirical validation of a hierarchical ranking model. Requirements engineering, 9, 186–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtiss, E.T., & Eustis, S. (2011). Business process management (BPM) market shares, strategies, and forecasts, worldwide, 2011 to 2017. Lexington, MA: Wintergreen Research, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dağdeviren, M., & Yüksel, İ (2008). Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management. Information Sciences, 178, 1717–1733. 10.1016/j.ins.2007.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, T.H. (1993). Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology: Boston. Mass: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L., & Williams, G. (1994). Evaluating and selecting simulation software using the analytic hierarchy process. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 5, 23–32. 10.1108/09576069410050314
   Google Scholar
• Eikebrokk, T.R., Iden, J., Olsen, D.H., & Opdahl, A.L. (2010). Determinants to the use of business process modeling. Paper presented at the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Elzinga, D.J., Horak, T., Chung-Yee Lee, C.-Y., & Bruner, C. (1995). Business process management: Survey and methodology. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 42, 119–128. 10.1109/17.387274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erol, I. & Ferrell, W.G. (2003). A methodology for selection problems with multiple, conflicting objectives and both qualitative and quantitative criteria. International Journal of Production Economics, 86, 187–199. 10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00049-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartner. (2008). Business process management. Retrieved September 10, 2013, from http://www.gartner.com/it/products/research/topics/topics.jsp#BPM.
   Google Scholar
• Gartner. (2010). Magic quadrant for business process management suites. Retrived September 10, 2013, from http://wwwimages.adobe.com/www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/enterprise/pdfs/magic-quadrant-for-business-process-management-suites.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Georgakopoulos, D., Hornick, M., & Sheth, A. (1995). An overview of workflow management: From process modeling to workflow automation infrastructure. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 3, 119–153. 10.1007/BF01277643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, J.B., Cantara, M., Kerremans, M., & Plummer, D.C. (2009). Magic quadrant for business process management suites. Stamford CT, US: Gartner Research.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, C., & Light, B. (1999). A critical success factors model for ERP implementation. IEEE Software, 16, 30–36. 10.1109/52.765784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadhav, A.S., & Sonar, R.M. (2009). Evaluating and selecting software packages: A review. Information and Software Technology, 51, 555–563. 10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadhav, A.S., & Sonar, R.M. (2011). Framework for evaluation and selection of the software packages: A hybrid knowledge based system approach. Journal of Systems and Software, 84, 1394–1407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, C., Beskese, A., & Ruan, D. (2004). Measuring flexibility of computer integrated manufacturing systems using fuzzy cash flow analysis. Information Sciences, 168, 77–94. 10.1016/j.ins.2003.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karim, J., Somers, T.M., & Bhattacherjee, A. (2007). The impact of ERP implementation on business process outcomes: A factor-based study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 101–134. 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, J. (1997). Managing software requirements using quality function deployment. Software Quality Control, 6, 311–326. 10.1023/A:1018580522999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontio, J., Chen, S.F., Limperos, K., Tesoriero, R., Caldiera, G., & Deutsch, M. (1995). A COTS selection method and experiences of its use. Paper presented at the Twentieth annual software engineering workshop.
   Google Scholar
• Koster, S.R. (2009). An evaluation method for business process management products. the Netherlands: University of Twente, Enschede.
   Google Scholar
• Kulak, O., Durmuşoğlu, M.B., & Kahraman, C. (2005). Fuzzy multi-attribute equipment selection based on information axiom. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 169, 337–345. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.03.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, V.S., Wong, B.K., & Cheung, W. (2002). Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: A case using the AHP in software selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 137, 134–144. 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00084-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Blanc, Louis A., & Tawfik Jelassi, M. (1989). DSS software selection: A multiple criteria decision methodology. Information & Management, 17, 49–65. 10.1016/0378-7206(89)90054-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H.S., Shen, P.D., & Chih, W.L. (2004). A fuzzy multiple criteria decision making model for software selection. Paper presented at the in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Morera, D. (2002, December). COTS evaluation using DESMET methodology & analytic hierarchy process (AHP). In International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement (pp. 485–493). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Önüt, S., Soner, S. (2008). Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment. Waste Management, 28, 1552–1559. 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patricia, K., Kathryn, E., & Deborah, A. (2001). A formal process for evaluating COTS software products. Paper presented at the IEEE Computer.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, M., & Rojas, T. (2000). Evaluation of workflow-type software products: A case study. Information and Software Technology, 42, 489–503. 10.1016/S0950-5849(00)00093-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recker, J.C. (2008). BPMN modeling–who, where, how and why. BPTrends, 5(3), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, B. (2010). The forrester wave™: Business process management suites, Q3 2010. For business process professionals. Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Roghanian, E., Rahimi, J., & Ansari, A. (2010). Comparison of first aggregation and last aggregation in fuzzy group TOPSIS. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34, 3754–3766. 10.1016/j.apm.2010.02.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouhani, S., Ghazanfari, M., & Jafari, M. (2012). Evaluation model of business intelligence for enterprise systems using fuzzy TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 3764–3771. 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şen, C.G., Baraçlı, H., Şen, S., & Başlıgil, H. (2009). An integrated decision support system dealing with qualitative and quantitative objectives for enterprise software selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 5272–5283. 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.06.070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shyur, H.J., & Shih, H.S. (2006). A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 44, 749–761. 10.1016/j.mcm.2005.04.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H., & Fingar, P. (2006). Business process management (BPM): The third wave. Tampa, FL, USA: Meghan-Kiffer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stamelos, I., Vlahavas, I., Refanidis, I., & Tsoukiàs, A. (2000). Knowledge based evaluation of software systems: A case study. Information and Software Technology, 42, 333–345. 10.1016/S0950-5849(99)00093-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strnadl, C.F. (2006). Aligning business and it: The process-driven architecture model. Information Systems Management, 23, 67–77. 10.1201/1078.10580530/46352.23.4.20060901/95115.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, V., & Liu, D.B. (1997). A risk-mitigating model for the development of reliable and maintainable large-scale commercial-off-the-shelf integrated software systems. Paper presented at the annual reliability and maintainability symposium.
   Google Scholar
• Trkman, P. (2010). The critical success factors of business process management. International Journal of Information Management, 30, 125–134. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Aalst, W., & Van Hee, K.M. (2004). Workflow management: Models, methods, and systems. Cambridge MA: The MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Vergidis, K., Tiwari, A., & Majeed, B. (2008). Business process analysis and optimization: Beyond reengineering. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 38, 69–82. 10.1109/TSMCC.2007.905812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.M., & Elhag, T. (2006). Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 31, 309–319. 10.1016/j.eswa.2005.09.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, C.C., & Wang, M.J.J. (2004). A comprehensive framework for selecting an ERP system. International Journal of Project Management, 22, 161–169. 10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00064-9
   Google Scholar
• Wei, C.C., Chien, C.F., & Wang, M.J.J. (2005). An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection. International Journal of Production Economics, 96, 47–62. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weske, M. (2007). Business process management: Concepts, languages, architectures. 2007. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Weske, M., Van der Aalst, W., & Verbeek, H. (2004). Advances in business process management. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 50(1), 1–8. 10.1016/j.datak.2004.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353. 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L.A. (1976). A fuzzy-algorithmic approach to the definition of complex or imprecise concepts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 8, 249–291. 10.1016/S0020-7373(76)80001-6
   Google Scholar
• Zahedi, F. (1990). A method for quantitative evaluation of expert systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 136–147. 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90070-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar