The Performance Of Value Stocks And Growth Stocks: The Hong Kong Stock Market 1981-2005

References

• Arshanapalli, B, Coggin, T D and Doukas, J (1998): “Multifactor Asset Pricing Analysis of International Value Investment Strategies”, Journal of Portfolio Management, 24(4), 10-23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banz, R W (1981): “The Relationship Between Return and Market Value of Common Stocks”, Journal of Financial Economics, 9, 3-18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banz, R W and Breen, W J (1986): “Sample Dependent Results Using Accounting and Market Data: Some Evidence”, Journal of Finance, 41, 779-793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbee, W C Jr., Mukherji, S and Raines, G A (1996): “Do Sales-Price and Debt-Equity Explain Stock Returns Better than Book-to-Market and Firm SizeŒ”, Financial Analysts Journal, 52(2), 56-60.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B M and Lyon, J D (1997): “Firm Size, Book-to-Market Ratio, and Security Returns: A Holdout Sample of Financial Firms”, Journal of Finance, 52, 875-883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, S (1977): “The Investment Performance of Common Stocks in Relation to Their Price-Earnings Ratios: A Test of the Efficient Market Hypothesis”, Journal of Finance, 32, 663-682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, S (1983): “The Relationship Between Earnings Yield, Market Value and Return for NYSE Common Stocks: Further Evidence”, Journal of Financial Economics, 12, 129-156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, W S, Conover, C M, and Miller, R E (1998): “Growth versus Value and Large-Cap versus Small-Cap Stocks in International Markets”, Financial Analysts Journal, 54(2), 75-89.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, W S and Miller, R E (1997): “Investor Expectations and the Performance of Value Stocks versus Growth Stocks”, Journal of Portfolio Management, 23(3), 57-69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari, L C (1988): “Debt/Equity Ratio and Expected Common Stock Returns: Empirical Evidence”, Journal of Finance, 43, 507-528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, F (1993): “Beta and Return”, Journal of Portfolio Management, 20(1), 8-18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capaul, C (1999): “Asset-Pricing Anomalies in Global Industry Indexes”, Financial Analysts Journal, 55(4), 17-37.
   Google Scholar
• Capaul, C, Rowley, I and Sharpe, W F (1993): “International Value and Growth Stock Returns”, Financial Analysts Journal, 49 (1), 27-36.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, L K C, Hamao, Y and Lakonishok, J (1991): “Fundamentals and Stock Returns in Japan”, Journal of Finance, 46, 1739-1764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, L K C, Hamao, Y and Lakonishok, J (1993): “Can Fundamentals Predict Japanese Stock ReturnsŒ”, Financial Analysts Journal, 49(4), 63-69.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, L K C, and Lakonishok, J (2004): “Value and Growth Investing: Review and Update”, Financial Analysts Journal, 60(1), 71-86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, L K C, Jegadeesh, N and Lakonishok, J (1995): “Evaluating the Performance of Value versus Glamour Stocks: the Impact of Selection Bias”, Journal of Financial Economics, 38, 269-296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chui, C W A, and Wei, K C J (1998): “Book-to-Market, Firm Size, and the Turn-of-the-Year Effect: Evidence from Pacific-Basin Emerging Markets”, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 6, 275-293.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, J, Cooper M, and Kaul G (2003): “Value versus Glamour”, Journal of Finance, 58, 1969-1995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, K, and Titman, S (1997): “Evidence on the Characteristics of Cross- sectional Variation in Stock Returns”, Journal of Finance, 52, 1-33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J L (1994): “The Cross-section of Realized Stock Returns: The Pre-Compustat Evidence”, Journal of Finance 49, 1579-1593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J L, Fama, E F and French, K R (2000): “Characteristics, Covariances, and Average Returns: 1929-1997”, Journal of Finance, 55, 389-406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bondt, W F M, and Thaler, R (1985): “Does the Stock Market OverreactŒ”, Journal of Finance, 40, 793-805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bondt, W F M, and Thaler, R (1987): “Further Evidence on Investor Overreaction and Stock Market Seasonality”, Journal of Finance, 42, 557-582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhatt, M S, Kim, Y H, and Mukherji, S (1999): “The Value Premium for Small-capitalization Stocks”, Financial Analysts Journal, 55(5), 60-68.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, D K, Chua, J L and Fetherston, T A (2005): “The Performance of Value and Growth Portfolios in East Asia Before the Asian Financial Crisis”, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13, 185-199.
   Google Scholar
• Dimson E, Nagel S and Garrett Q (2003): “Capturing the Value Premium in the United Kingdom”, Financial Analysts Journal, 59(6), 35-45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E F and French, K R (1992): “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns”, Journal of Finance, 47, 427-465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E F and French, K R (1993): “Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds”, Journal of Financial Economics, 33, 3-56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E F and French, K R (1995): “Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Earnings and Returns”, Journal of Finance, 50, 131-155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E F and French, K R (1996): “Multifactor Explanation of Asset Pricing Anomalies”, Journal of Finance, 51, 55-84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E F and French, K R (1998): “Value versus Growth: The International Evidence”, Journal of Finance, 53, 1975-1999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E F and MacBeth, J (1973): “Risk, Return and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests”, Journal of Political Economy, 81, 607-636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, E and Page, M (2000): “Value and Momentum Strategies: Evidence from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange”, Investment Analysts Journal, 51, 25-35.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, G V and Stanley, J C (1970): Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology, 1st Edition, New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, M and Uliana, E (2001): “Evidence of a Value-growth Phenomenon on the Johannesbirg Stock Exchange”, Investment Analysts Journal, 53, 7 - 18.
   Google Scholar
• Jegadeesh, N and Titman, S (1993): “Return to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency”, Journal of Finance, 48, 65-91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, G R, Johnson, R R and Mercer, J M (1997): “New Evidence on Size and Price-to-Book Effects in Stock Returns”, Financial Analysts Journal, 53(6), 34-42.
   Google Scholar
• Kathari, S P, Shanken, J and Sloan, R G (1995): “Another Look at the Cross-section of Expected Stock Returns”, Journal of Finance, 50, 185-224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta, R (1996): “Expectations and the Cross-section of Stock Returns”, Journal of Finance, 51, 1715-1742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta, R, Lakonishok, J, Shleifer, A and Vishny, R (1997): “Good News for Value Stocks: Further Evidence on Market Efficiency”, Journal of Finance, 52, 859-874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakonishok, J, Shleifer, A and Vishny, R (1994): “Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation and Risk,” Journal of Fiance, 49, 1541-1578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, K (2000): “The Conditional Relation Between Beta and Returns in the Hong Kong Stock Market”, Applied Financial Economics, 11, 669-680.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, K S K (2002): “The Relationship Between Size, Book-to-market Equity Ratio, Earnings-price Ratio, and Return for the Hong Kong Stock Market”, Global Finance Journal 13, 163-179.
   Google Scholar
• Leledakis, G and Davidson, I (2001): “Were Two Factors EnoughŒ The U.K. evidence”, Financial Analysts Journal, 57(6), 96-105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, A W and MacKinlay, A C (1990): “Data-Snooping Biases in Tests of Financial Asset Pricing Models”, Review Financial Studies, 3, 431-467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughran, T (1997): “Book-to-Market Across Firm Size, Exchange, and Seasonality: Was There an EffectŒ”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 32, 249-268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinlay, A C (1995): “Multifactor Models Do Not Explain Deviation From the CAPM”, Journal of Financial Economics, 38, 3-28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherji, S, Dhatt, M S and Kim, Y H (1997): “A Fundamental Analysis of Korean Stock Returns”, Financial Analysts Journal, 53(3), 75-80.
   Google Scholar
• Page, M J and Palmer, F (1991): “The Relationship Between Excess Returns, Firm Size and Earnings on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange”, South African Journal of Business Management, 22(3), 63-73.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, B, Reid, K and Lanstein, R (1985): “Persuasive Evidence of Market Inefficiency”, Journal of Portfolio Management, 11(3), 9-16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scher, N and Muller, C (2005): “Equity Style and Performance Persistence in South African Unit Trusts”, Investment Analysts Journal, 61, 5-16.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rensburg, P (2001): “A Decomposition of Style-based Risk on the JSE”, Investment Analysts Journal, 54, 45-60.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rensburg, P and Robertson, M (2003): “Style Characteristics and the Cross-section of JSE Returns”, Investment Analysts Journal, 57, 1-11.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L (2005): “The Value Premium”, Journal of Finance, 60, 67-103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar