Finnish discourses of the stakeholders on development of the implementation of EU legislation concerned with occupational safety and health in computer work

References

• Finnish Legislation. [Finnish Government Decree in VDU work 1405/1993]. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health; 1993. Finnish. [cited 2013 August 2]. Available from: http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/1993/19931405
   Google Scholar
• EU Council Directive. Council Directive 90/270/EEC of 29 May 1990 on the minimum safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipment (fifth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Directive 89/391/EEC). OJ. 1990;L156:14–18. [cited 2013 August 2]. Availabe from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31990L0270:EN:NOT
   Google Scholar
• EU Commission. Evaluation in the Commission; 2010. [cited 2013 August 2]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/secretariat_general/evaluation/index_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• EU Commission. Evaluation and impact assessment; 2010. [cited 2013 August 2]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=307andlangId=en
   Google Scholar
• European Study. Evaluation of the EU Directive 90/270/ EEC. The development of a methodology to assess the quality of EU Directives: pilot study on basis of the Directive on Visual Display Units (Directive 90/270 EEC). Integrated Cross-national Report. Munich, November 2007. [cited 2013 July 12]. Available from: http://www.bmas.de/portal/25944/property=pdf/evaluation__bildschirmarbeitsrichtlinie__bericht__englisch.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Gestel R, Vranken J. Assessing the accuracy of ex ante evaluation through feedback research: a case study. In: Verschuuren J, editor. The impact of legislation: a critical analysis of ex ante evaluation. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff; 2009. p. 199–228.
   Google Scholar
• Popelier P, Verlinden V. The context of the rise of ex ante evaluation. In: Verschuuren J, editor. The impact of legislation: a critical analysis of ex ante evaluation. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff; 2009. p. 13–38.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Evaluation. Evaluation of the VDU directive. Danish Working Environment Authority and Ramboll Management, Århus; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Dutch evaluation. Dutch evaluation of the VDU Directive (Directive 270/90/EEC). Prepared by Bjorking, H, Pieters, I, Engelen, M, et al. Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment ; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Gervais RL, Williamson J, Sanders V, et al. Evaluation of the success in Great Britain of the Directive on minimum safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipment. A comparative assessment of the 1997 and 2007 evaluations. Health and Safety Executive, Research Report RR 622, 2008. [cited 2013 July 12]. Available from: http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr622.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gervais RL, Williamson J, Sanders V, et al. Evaluation of the success in Great Britain of the Directive on minimum safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipment. Health and Safety Executive, Research Report RR 628, 2008. [cited 2013 July 12]. Available from: http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr628.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Niskanen T, Lehtelä J, Ketola R, et al. Results of Finnish national survey on EU legislation concerning computer work. Appl Ergon. 2010;41:542–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greimas AJ. On meaning: selected writings in semiotic theory. Minneapolis (MN): University of Minnesota Press; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Greimas AJ. The social sciences: a semiotic view. Minneapolis (MN): University of Minnesota Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Hébert L. Tools for text and image analysis: an introduction to applied semiotics. Université du Québec à Rimouski; 2011. [cited 2014 February 25]. Available from: http://www.signosemio.com/documents/Louis-Hebert-Tools-for-Texts-and-Images.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Greimas AJ, Courtes J. Semiotics and language: an analytical dictionary. Bloomington (IN): Indiana UP; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Hébert L. The actantial model. [cited 2014 February 25]. Available from: http://www.signosemio.com/greimas/actantial-model.asp
   Google Scholar
• Lord RG, Dinh JE. Aggregation processes and levels of analysis as organizing structures for leadership theory. In: Day DV, Antonakis J, editors. The nature of leadership. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2012. p. 29–65.
   Google Scholar
• Cunliffe A. Orientations to social constructionism: relationally responsive social constructionism and its implications for knowledge and learning. Management Learning. 2008;39:123–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairhurst G, Grant D. The social construction of leadership: a sailing guide. Management Communication Quarterly. 2010;24:171–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhl-Bien M, Maslyn J, Ospina S. The nature of relational leadership: a multitheoretical lens on leadership relationships and processes. In: Day DV, Antonakis J, editors. The nature of leadership. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2012. p. 289–330.
   Google Scholar
• Niskanen T, Lehtelä J, Länsikallio R. Application of a screening method in assessing occupational safety and health of computer workstations. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2014;20:167–174. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2014.11077032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenster PV, Hussey DE. Company analysis: determining strategic capability. New York: Wiley; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson MM, O'Neill MJ, Miller H. Reducing musculoskeletal discomfort: effects of an office ergonomics workplace and training intervention. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2003;9:491–502. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2003.11076585
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malińska M, Bugajska J. The influence of occupational and non-occupational factors on the prevalence of musculoskeletal complaints in users of portable computers. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2010;16:337–343. doi:10.1080/10803548.2010.11076850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigurdsson SO, Artnak M, Needham M, et al. Motivating ergonomic computer workstation setup: sometimes training is not enough. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2012;18:27–33. doi:10.1080/10803548.2012.11076912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziefle M. Sitting posture, postural discomfort, and visual performance: a critical view on the interdependence of cognitive and anthropometric factors in the VDU workplace. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2003;9:503–514. doi:10.1080/10803548.2003.11076586
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park (CA): Sage; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson P, Kovalainen A. Qualitative methods in business research. London: Sage; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. London: Sage; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Yin R. Case study research: design and methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1994.
   Google Scholar