Influence of safety motivation and climate on safety behaviour and outcomes: evidence from the Saudi Arabian construction industry

References

• Sawacha E, Naoum S, Fong D. Factors affecting safety performance on construction sites. Int J Proj Manag. 1999;17(5):309–315. doi: 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00042-8
   Google Scholar
• Hinze J, Godfrey R. An evaluation of safety performance measures for construction projects. J Constr Res. 2003;4(1):5–15. doi: 10.1142/S160994510300025X
   Google Scholar
• Health and Safety Executive (HSE). Improving health and safety in construction. Phase 1: data collection, review and structuring. Sadbury: HSE Books; 2001. (Research Report 386/2001).
   Google Scholar
• General Organization for Social Insurance (GOSI). Annual statistical report 1431 H. Riyadh: GOSI; 2010. Available from: http://www.gosi.gov.sa/portal/web/guest/opendata.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen CP. A causal model of the relationship among accidents, biodata, personality, and cognitive factors. J Appl Psychol. 1989;74(1):81–90. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.1.81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland VJ, Cooper CL. Personality, stress and accident involvement in the offshore oil and gas industry. Pers Individ Dif. 1991;12(2):195–204. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(91)90103-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garavan T, O’Brien F. An investigation into the relationship between safety climate and safety behaviours in Irish organisations. Irish J Manag. 2001;22(1):141–170.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyos CG. Occupational safety: progress in understanding the basic aspects of safe and unsafe behaviour. Appl Psychol. 1995;44(3):233–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1995.tb01078.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jitwasinkul B. Role of organizational factors on safety work behaviour of construction workers: a Bayesian belief network approach [ doctoral dissertation]. Klong Luang: Asian Institute of Technology; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke S. An integrative model of safety climate: linking psychological climate and work attitudes to individual safety outcomes using meta-analysis. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2010;83(3):553–578. doi: 10.1348/096317909X452122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal A, Griffin M. A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91(4):946–953. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar D. Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. J Appl Psychol. 1980;65(1):96. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glennon DP. Safety climate in organisations. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Ergonomics Society of Australia and New Zealand; 1982, Nov 25–26; University of Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Canter D, Donald I. Accident by design: environmental, attitudinal and organizational aspects of accidents. Paper presented at: 11th International Conference of the International Association for the Study of People and their Physical Settings; 1990 Jul 8–12; Ankara, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Cox SJ, Cox TR. The structure of employee attitudes to safety: a European example. Work Stress. 1991;5(2):93–106. doi: 10.1080/02678379108257007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomas J, Oliver A. The perceived effect of safety climate on occupational accidents. Proceedings of the Work and Well-being: An Agenda for Europe Conference; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Neal A, Griffin MA, Hart PM. The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Saf Sci. 2000;34(1–3):99–109. doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00008-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed S. Empirical investigation of construction safety management activities and performance in Australia. Saf Sci. 1999;33(3):129–142. doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(99)00028-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin MA, Neal A. Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. J Occup Health Psychol. 2000;5(3):347–358. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zohar D. Thirty years of safety climate research: reflections and future directions. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42(5):1517–1522. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal A, Griffin MA. Safety climate and safety at work. In: Barling J, Frone MR, editors. The psychology of workplace safety. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke S, Robertson I. A meta-analytic review of the Big Five personality factors and accident involvement in occupational and non-occupational settings. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2005;78(3):355–376. doi: 10.1348/096317905X26183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian MS, Bradley JC, Wallace JC, et al. Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(5):1103–1127. doi: 10.1037/a0016172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andriessen JHTH. Safe behaviour and safety motivation. J Occup Accid. 1978;1(4):363–376. doi: 10.1016/0376-6349(78)90006-8
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann DA, Jacobs R, Landy F. High reliability process industries: individual, micro, and macro organizational influences on safety performance. J Safety Res. 1995;26(3):131–149. doi: 10.1016/0022-4375(95)00011-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst TM, Brubaker TL. The effects of job insecurity on employee safety outcomes: cross-sectional and longitudinal explorations. J Occup Health Psychol. 2001;6(2):139–159. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.6.2.139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson AM, Feyer A-M, Cairns D, et al. The development of a measure of safety climate: the role of safety perceptions and attitudes. Saf Sci. 1997;25(1–3):15–27. doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00020-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed S. Safety climate in construction site environments. J Constr Eng Manag. 2002;128(5):375–384. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:5(375)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zin SM, Ismail F. Employers’ behavioural safety compliance factors toward occupational, safety and health improvement in the construction industry. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2012;36:742–751. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.081
   Google Scholar
• Cooper MD, Phillips RA. Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship. J Safety Res. 2004;35(5):497–512. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2004.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geller ES. The psychology of safety handbook. Boca Raton (FL): Lewis; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Simard M, Marchand A. Workgroups’ propensity to comply with safety rules: the influence of micro-macro organisational factors. Ergonomics. 1997;40(2):172–188. doi: 10.1080/001401397188288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rundmo T. Associations between risk perception and safety. Saf Sci. 1996;24(3):197–209. doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00038-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee T. Assessment of safety culture at a nuclear reprocessing plant. Work Stress. 1998;12(3):217–237. doi: 10.1080/02678379808256863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fey CF. Opening the black box of motivation: a cross-cultural comparison of Sweden and Russia. Int Bus Rev. 2005;14(3):345–367. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2005.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke E, Latham G. What should we do about motivation theory? Six recommendations for the twenty-first century. Acad Manage Rev. 2004;29(3):388–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol Bull. 1999;125(6):627–668. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss HM. Learning theory and industrial and organizational psychology. In: Hough MDDLM, editor. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. 1. 2nd ed. Palo Alto (CA): Consulting Psychologists Press; 1990. p. 171–221.
   Google Scholar
• Teo EAL, Ling FYY, Chong AFW. Framework for project managers to manage construction safety. Int J Proj Manag. 2005;23(4):329–341. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Jones G, George J. Contemporary management. 3rd ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Nirmala R. Individual work motivation and leader behaviour in multicultural workplace. Delhi: J.K. Singh for Abhijeet Publications; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ferraro L. Measuring safety climate: the implications for safety performance [doctoral dissertation]. Melbourne: University of Melbourne; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Vinodkumar MN, Bhasi M. Safety management practices and safety behaviour: assessing the mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42(6):2082–2093. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.06.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang D, Chen Y, Wong L. Safety climate in construction industry: a case study in Hong Kong. J Constr Eng Manag. 2006;132(6):573. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:6(573)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flin R, Mearns K, O’Connor P, et al. Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features. Saf Sci. 2000;34(1–3):177–192. doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00012-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee T, Harrison K. Assessing safety culture in nuclear power stations. Saf Sci. 2000;34(1–3):61–97. doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00007-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver A, Cheyne A, Tomas JM, et al. The effects of organizational and individual factors on occupational accidents. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2002;75(4):473–488. doi: 10.1348/096317902321119691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang L, Yu G, Li Y, et al. Perceived colleagues’ safety knowledge/behavior and safety performance: Safety climate as a moderator in a multilevel study. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42(5):1468–1476. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.08.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siu O-l, Phillips DR, Leung T-w. Safety climate and safety performance among construction workers in Hong Kong: the role of psychological strains as mediators. Accid Anal Prev. 2004;36(3):359–366. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00016-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenhar L, Williams LJ, Swanson N. Modelling relationships between job stressors and injury and near-miss outcomes for construction labourers. Work Stress. 2003;17(3):218–240. doi: 10.1080/02678370310001616144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacharatos A, Barling J, Iverson RD. High-performance work systems and occupational safety. J Appl Psychol. 2005;90(1):77. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niskanen T. Safety climate in the road administration. Saf Sci. 1994;17(4):237–255. doi: 10.1016/0925-7535(94)90026-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabrera DD, Isla R, Vilela LD. An evaluation of safety climate in ground handling activities. In: Soekkha H, editor. Aviation safety: human factors, system engineering, flight operations, economics, strategies, management. Utrecht: VSP; 1997. p. 255–268.
   Google Scholar
• Yule S. Senior management influence on safety performance in the UK and US energy sectors [doctoral dissertation]. Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen; 2003. Available from: http://www.acecc.org.au/forum/attach/65_604078144832-zohar_(1980)_was_the_pioneer_of_assessing_the_state_of_safety_via_an_attitude_questionnaire_instead_of_concentrating_on_lagging_indicators.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhry R, Fang D, Lingard H. Measuring safety climate of a construction company. J Constr Eng Manag. 2009;135(9):890–899. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillen M, Baltz D, Gassel M, et al. Perceived safety climate, job demands, and coworker support among union and nonunion injured construction workers. J Safety Res. 2002;33(1):33–51. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4375(02)00002-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pousette A, Larsson S, Törner M. Safety climate cross-validation, strength and prediction of safety behaviour. Saf Sci. 2008;46(3):398–404. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown RL, Holmes H. The use of a factor-analytic procedure for assessing the validity of an employee safety climate model. Accid Anal Prev. 1986;18(6):455–470. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(86)90019-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borman WC, Motowidlo S. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In: Schmitt N, Borman W, editors. Personnel selection in organizations. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 1993. p. 71–98.
   Google Scholar
• Schutte R. Safety performance in the construction sector [ master’s thesis]. Utrecht: Utrecht University; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behaviour: an introduction to theory and research. Philos Rhetor. 1977;10(2):130–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamid A, Rahim A, Majid A, et al. Causes of accidents at construction sites. Malaysian J Civil Eng. 2008;20(2):242–259.
   Google Scholar
• Lusk SL, Ronis DL, Baer LM. A comparison of multiple indicators: observations, supervisor report, and self-report as measures of workers' hearing protection use. Eval Health Prof. 1995;18(1):51–63. doi: 10.1177/016327879501800104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alolah T, Stewart RA, Panuwatwanich K, et al. Determining the causal relationships among balanced scorecard perspectives on school safety performance: case of Saudi Arabia. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;68:57–74. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alolah T, Stewart RA, Panuwatwanich K, et al. Developing a comprehensive safety performance evaluation framework for Saudi schools. Int J Prod Perf Manag. 2014;63(4):446–476. doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-05-2013-0096
   Google Scholar
• Howarth T, Watson DP. Construction safety management. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Cavana RY, Delahaye BL, Sekaran U. Applied business research: qualitative and quantitative methods. Milton: Wiley; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Panuwatwanich K, Stewart RA, Mohamed S. The role of climate for innovation in enhancing business performance: the case of design firms. Eng Const Arch Manage. 2008;15(5):407–422. doi: 10.1108/09699980810902712
   Google Scholar
• Gerbing DW, Anderson JC. An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. J Mark Res. 1988;25(2):186–192. doi: 10.2307/3172650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, et al. Multivariate data analysis: with readings. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmbeck GN. Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: examples from the child-clinical and paediatric psychology literatures. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997;65(4):599–610. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.65.4.599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood CJ. Moderation and mediation in structural equation modeling: applications for early intervention research. J Early Interv. 2007;29(3):262–272. doi: 10.1177/105381510702900305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkis J, Gonzalez-Torre P, Adenso-Diaz B. Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: the mediating effect of training. J Oper Manag. 2010;28(2):163–176. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2009.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar D, Luria G. A multilevel model of safety climate: cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates. J Appl Psychol. 2005;90(4):616–628. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright L. Does person-organization fit mediate the relationship between public service motivation and the job performance of public employees? Rev Public Personnel Admin. 2007;27(4):361–379. doi: 10.1177/0734371X07307149
   Google Scholar
• Kristof AL. Person-organization fit: an integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Pers Psychol. 1996;49(1):1–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar